top of page

Argumentative Essay

Essays Written by A* students

Justifiability of Censorship in the Arts

Censorship of the arts can never be justified. Discuss

October/November 2022-Cambridge International AS Level-8021/12-ENGLISH GENERAL PAPER

1.png

Discussing the potential harm of censorship

3.png

Analyzing the impact on artistic freedom

Brainstorming Ideas.

2.png

Addressing the balance between protection and art

Essay

Censorship of the arts refers to the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, music, and other forms of creative expression by governments, religious organizations, and other groups or individuals. The issue of censorship in the arts is a complex and highly debated one, with valid arguments on both sides.

One argument in favor of censorship is the need to protect the public from allegedly tasteless or offensive works of art. Governments and other organizations may believe that certain forms of expression, such as graphic violence or sexual content, can be harmful to certain individuals or groups. Additionally, censorship can be used to prevent the spread of hate speech or other forms of harmful expression.

Another argument in favor of censorship is the concern of government and religious organizations about political messages that are perceived to undermine society. Governments may wish to prevent the spread of ideas that could incite violence or destabilize the country. Similarly, religious organizations may feel that certain forms of expression are blasphemy or immoral, and should be suppressed.

On the other hand, censorship of the arts can also be seen as a violation of the right to freedom of expression. The arts are a fundamental expression of the human spirit, and should not be suppressed or censored by authorities. Moreover, the arts can also play a vital role in challenging society and its norms. Artistic works can raise awareness on important issues and serve as a catalyst for social and political change.

Another critical point to consider is the question of who should be in charge of censorship and who they are accountable to. In many cases, censorship is imposed by governments or other powerful entities, which can lead to the suppression of dissenting voices and the promotion of a particular agenda.

Additionally, censorship can also have a negative impact on minority groups, as it can be used to silence marginalized voices and prevent them from being heard.

Furthermore, changing social and moral attitudes over time can also affect what is considered acceptable for censorship. What may be considered offensive or controversial today may be accepted as mainstream tomorrow.

In conclusion, censorship of the arts is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While censorship can be used to protect the public from allegedly tasteless or offensive works of art, it can also be used to suppress dissenting voices and prevent the spread of ideas that could incite violence or destabilize the country. The arts are a fundamental expression of the human spirit and should not be suppressed, but the question of who should be in charge of censorship, who are they accountable to, and how to balance the right to freedom of expression with the need to protect society is a challenging one.

english essays examples.png

Free Essays Written By Top Students

Narrative

Descriptive

Persuasive

Directed

bottom of page