top of page

Is external recruitment better than internal recruitment when recruiting a new manager for a large business?

CAMBRIDGE

O level and GCSE

Year Examined

February/March 21

Topic

Recruitment Methods

👑Complete Model Essay

External vs. Internal Recruitment for Managers in Large Businesses

When a large business needs a new manager, it faces a crucial decision: promote from within or seek external talent. Both internal and external recruitment offer distinct advantages and disadvantages. This essay will explore both approaches and argue that while internal recruitment can be beneficial, external recruitment often proves more advantageous for securing the best managerial talent and driving innovation.

Advantages of External Recruitment

Wider Pool of Candidates: External recruitment casts a wider net, attracting professionals with diverse experiences and skillsets. This increases the likelihood of finding a candidate who perfectly matches the role's requirements. For instance, a technology company seeking a manager with expertise in a specific emerging field might struggle to find a suitable candidate internally.

Fresh Perspectives and Innovation: External hires bring fresh ideas and perspectives, potentially revitalizing stagnant processes and fostering innovation. They can challenge existing norms and introduce best practices from their previous experiences, ultimately enhancing efficiency and competitiveness. An example is a company hiring a manager from a competitor who introduces a successful marketing strategy.

Objectivity and Reduced Internal Conflict: External recruitment promotes fairness and objectivity in the selection process, minimizing potential biases or resentment that can arise from internal promotions. This is particularly crucial in large businesses where internal competition for promotions can be fierce.

Advantages of Internal Recruitment

Cost and Time Efficiency: Internal recruitment is generally quicker and less expensive than external searches. Companies save on advertising, recruitment agency fees, and extensive onboarding processes. Existing employees are already familiar with the company culture and operations, enabling them to integrate seamlessly into their new roles.

Motivation and Retention: Promoting from within demonstrates a commitment to employee development and creates a clear career path, fostering loyalty and reducing employee turnover. This can be highly motivating for employees and contribute to a positive work environment.

Existing Knowledge Base: Internal hires already possess valuable knowledge about the company's operations, culture, and industry, allowing them to hit the ground running and make immediate contributions.

Justification: Why External Recruitment Often Prevails

While internal recruitment offers advantages, external recruitment often proves more beneficial for securing top managerial talent, particularly in large businesses. Here's why:

Limited Internal Talent Pool: In some cases, suitable internal candidates may not be available, especially for highly specialized roles. Relying solely on internal promotions could lead to settling for a less qualified candidate, hindering growth and innovation.

Risk of 'Inbreeding': Excessive reliance on internal promotions can lead to an "inbred" organizational culture, stifling fresh ideas and hindering adaptability to the dynamic business environment. External hires bring in new perspectives, challenging the status quo and driving progress.

Long-Term Return on Investment: Although external recruitment can be initially expensive, the long-term benefits often outweigh the costs. The right external hire, with their specialized skills and fresh ideas, can significantly impact a company's profitability and market position. This is particularly relevant for large businesses where even small improvements can translate into substantial gains.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while internal recruitment holds merit in terms of cost-effectiveness, motivation, and existing knowledge, external recruitment often proves more advantageous for large businesses seeking to fill managerial positions. The influx of fresh perspectives, specialized skills, and potential for innovation from external hires can significantly outweigh the initial costs, positioning the business for long-term success in today's competitive landscape.

Is external recruitment better than internal recruitment when recruiting a new manager for a large business?

Score Big with Perfectly Structured Business Studies Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

Business Studies Pack.

✅ Model Essays for past papers questions

 

✅Covers Cambridge Exam Boards

✅ Suitable for A Level

​​

✅A Library of over 400 Essays

 

✅ Download all Essays in PDF format

...and much more!

​​​

Free Essay Plan 🍃

External vs. Internal Recruitment for Managers in Large Businesses

When a large business needs a new manager, it faces a crucial decision: promote from within or seek external talent. Both internal and external recruitment offer distinct advantages and disadvantages. This essay will explore both approaches and argue that while internal recruitment can be beneficial, external recruitment often proves more advantageous for securing the best managerial talent and driving innovation.

Advantages of External Recruitment

Wider Pool of Candidates: External recruitment casts a wider net, attracting professionals with diverse experiences and skillsets. This increases the likelihood of finding a candidate who perfectly matches the role's requirements. For instance, a technology company seeking a manager with expertise in a specific emerging field might struggle to find a suitable candidate internally.

Fresh Perspectives and Innovation: External hires bring fresh ideas and perspectives, potentially revitalizing stagnant processes and fostering innovation. They can challenge existing norms and introduce best practices from their previous experiences, ultimately enhancing efficiency and competitiveness. An example is a company hiring a manager from a competitor who introduces a successful marketing strategy.

Objectivity and Reduced Internal Conflict: External recruitment promotes fairness and objectivity in the selection process, minimizing potential biases or resentment that can arise from internal promotions. This is particularly crucial in large businesses where internal competition for promotions can be fierce.

Advantages of Internal Recruitment

Cost and Time Efficiency: Internal recruitment is generally quicker and less expensive than external searches. Companies save on advertising, recruitment agency fees, and extensive onboarding processes. Existing employees are already familiar with the company culture and operations, enabling them to integrate seamlessly into their new roles.

Motivation and Retention: Promoting from within demonstrates a commitment to employee development and creates a clear career path, fostering loyalty and reducing employee turnover. This can be highly motivating for employees and contribute to a positive work environment.

Existing Knowledge Base: Internal hires already possess valuable knowledge about the company's operations, culture, and industry, allowing them to hit the ground running and make immediate contributions.

Justification: Why External Recruitment Often Prevails

While internal recruitment offers advantages, external recruitment often proves more beneficial for securing top managerial talent, particularly in large businesses. Here's why:

Limited Internal Talent Pool: In some cases, suitable internal candidates may not be available, especially for highly specialized roles. Relying solely on internal promotions could lead to settling for a less qualified candidate, hindering growth and innovation.

Risk of 'Inbreeding': Excessive reliance on internal promotions can lead to an "inbred" organizational culture, stifling fresh ideas and hindering adaptability to the dynamic business environment. External hires bring in new perspectives, challenging the status quo and driving progress.

Long-Term Return on Investment: Although external recruitment can be initially expensive, the long-term benefits often outweigh the costs. The right external hire, with their specialized skills and fresh ideas, can significantly impact a company's profitability and market position. This is particularly relevant for large businesses where even small improvements can translate into substantial gains.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while internal recruitment holds merit in terms of cost-effectiveness, motivation, and existing knowledge, external recruitment often proves more advantageous for large businesses seeking to fill managerial positions. The influx of fresh perspectives, specialized skills, and potential for innovation from external hires can significantly outweigh the initial costs, positioning the business for long-term success in today's competitive landscape.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Question:

Do you think external recruitment is better than internal recruitment when recruiting a new manager for a large business? Justify your answer.

Award up to [marks] for identification of relevant issues. Award up to [marks] for relevant development of points. Award [marks] for justified decision as to whether external recruitment is better than internal recruitment when recruiting a new manager for a large business.

Points might include:

External recruitment:

  • Wider pool/choice of candidates [k] improving chances of finding the most appropriate person [an]
  • Bring in new ideas/experience/skills [k] could help increase efficiency [an]
  • Avoids risk of upsetting other employees when someone who is internal is promoted [k]

Internal recruitment:

  • Quicker/cheaper than external recruitment [k] which reduces expenses [an]
  • Acts as an incentive/motivation for employees [k] so reducing labour turnover [an]
  • People know the business [k] so can start work more quickly [an]
  • Company knows the people/employee [k]
  • Suitable candidates may not be available [k]
  • Would create another vacancy for the business to fill [k]

Justification might include:

External recruitment might be more expensive [k] which will increase costs [an]. However, the business might have no choice as there may not be suitable internal applicants [k]. So, there may be no new ideas which could increase efficiency [an]. Therefore, using external recruitment would be better as it may result in the appointment of a manager whose cost savings will soon outweigh the cost of external recruitment [eval] especially as this is more likely in a large business [eval]. Other appropriate responses should also be credited.

bottom of page