Is issuing new shares a better way for a limited company to finance expansion than using a bank loan? Justify your answer.
CAMBRIDGE
O level and GCSE
Year Examined
October/November 2021
Topic
Sources of Finance
👑Complete Model Essay
Issuing New Shares vs. Bank Loans for Business Expansion
When a limited company seeks to expand its operations, securing adequate financing is crucial. Two common avenues for raising capital are issuing new shares and obtaining bank loans. While both methods have their merits and drawbacks, issuing new shares can be a more advantageous approach for financing expansion under certain circumstances.
Advantages of Issuing New Shares
Permanent Capital: Unlike bank loans that necessitate repayment with interest, issuing new shares provides a permanent source of capital. This eliminates the pressure of regular loan repayments, freeing up cash flow for other business operations. As asserted in "Financial Management: Principles and Practice" by Brigham and Ehrhardt, equity financing offers greater financial flexibility compared to debt financing.
Access to Greater Capital: Companies face limitations on the loan amounts they can secure. In contrast, there are no restrictions on the number of shares a company can issue, potentially allowing for significantly larger capital injections. This is particularly beneficial for large-scale expansion projects.
No Interest Payments: Issuing new shares does not involve interest payments, unlike bank loans, which can carry hefty interest rates. Avoiding interest expenses can significantly reduce a company's fixed costs, enhancing profitability.
Disadvantages of Issuing New Shares
Potential Loss of Control: Issuing new shares invariably dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders. If a significant number of shares are issued, it could lead to a change in control, potentially even a takeover. This risk is highlighted in "Corporate Finance" by Ross, Westerfield, and Jaffe, which emphasizes the importance of considering control implications in equity financing decisions.
Cost and Time: The process of issuing new shares, including legal and administrative requirements, can be time-consuming and expensive. This can divert valuable resources and management's attention away from core business activities.
Shareholder Expectations: New shareholders typically invest with the expectation of dividends. While not mandatory, dividend payments can become an additional financial obligation for the company.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both options have their pros and cons, issuing new shares can be a more advantageous way for a limited company to finance expansion, particularly if the company prioritizes long-term growth and seeks to avoid the burden of debt. However, the potential dilution of control, the cost and time involved, and shareholder expectations must be carefully considered. Ultimately, the best approach depends on the specific circumstances of the company, its risk tolerance, and its long-term financial strategy.
Is issuing new shares a better way for a limited company to finance expansion than using a bank loan? Justify your answer.
Note: Business Studies Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured Business Studies Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
Business Studies Pack.
✅ Model Essays for past papers questions
✅Covers Cambridge Exam Boards
✅ Suitable for A Level
✅A Library of over 400 Essays
✅ Download all Essays in PDF format
...and much more!
Free Essay Plan 🍃
Issuing New Shares vs. Bank Loans for Business Expansion
When a limited company seeks to expand its operations, securing adequate financing is crucial. Two common avenues for raising capital are issuing new shares and obtaining bank loans. While both methods have their merits and drawbacks, issuing new shares can be a more advantageous approach for financing expansion under certain circumstances.
Advantages of Issuing New Shares
Permanent Capital: Unlike bank loans that necessitate repayment with interest, issuing new shares provides a permanent source of capital. This eliminates the pressure of regular loan repayments, freeing up cash flow for other business operations. As asserted in "Financial Management: Principles and Practice" by Brigham and Ehrhardt, equity financing offers greater financial flexibility compared to debt financing.
Access to Greater Capital: Companies face limitations on the loan amounts they can secure. In contrast, there are no restrictions on the number of shares a company can issue, potentially allowing for significantly larger capital injections. This is particularly beneficial for large-scale expansion projects.
No Interest Payments: Issuing new shares does not involve interest payments, unlike bank loans, which can carry hefty interest rates. Avoiding interest expenses can significantly reduce a company's fixed costs, enhancing profitability.
Disadvantages of Issuing New Shares
Potential Loss of Control: Issuing new shares invariably dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders. If a significant number of shares are issued, it could lead to a change in control, potentially even a takeover. This risk is highlighted in "Corporate Finance" by Ross, Westerfield, and Jaffe, which emphasizes the importance of considering control implications in equity financing decisions.
Cost and Time: The process of issuing new shares, including legal and administrative requirements, can be time-consuming and expensive. This can divert valuable resources and management's attention away from core business activities.
Shareholder Expectations: New shareholders typically invest with the expectation of dividends. While not mandatory, dividend payments can become an additional financial obligation for the company.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both options have their pros and cons, issuing new shares can be a more advantageous way for a limited company to finance expansion, particularly if the company prioritizes long-term growth and seeks to avoid the burden of debt. However, the potential dilution of control, the cost and time involved, and shareholder expectations must be carefully considered. Ultimately, the best approach depends on the specific circumstances of the company, its risk tolerance, and its long-term financial strategy.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Do you think issuing new shares is a better way for a limited company to finance expansion than using a bank loan? Justify your answer.
Issuing new shares can be a better way for a limited company to finance expansion than using a bank loan, but there are advantages and disadvantages to both options. Let's examine the key factors.
Points to Consider:
Issue New Shares:
- Permanent source of capital (k) so no need to repay (an)
- Access to greater amounts of capital (k) as no restriction on the number of shares (an)
- No interest to pay (k) so fixed costs do not increase (an) and can avoid increasing debt (an)
- Possible loss of control/risk of takeover (k) making it difficult to manage or take decisions (an)
- Cost/time to arrange (k) so not able to focus on other issues (an)
- Shareholders might expect dividends (k)
Discussion:
Issuing new shares provides a permanent source of capital without the need for repayment. This can be beneficial for the company in the long term as there is no pressure to repay the capital, unlike bank loans where regular payments are required. Additionally, new shares offer access to greater amounts of capital since there are no restrictions on the number of shares that can be issued. This provides flexibility for the company to raise substantial funds for expansion.
Furthermore, by issuing new shares, the company avoids paying interest, which helps in managing fixed costs and prevents an increase in debt levels. This can be advantageous compared to bank loans where interest payments add to the financial burden. However, issuing new shares may lead to a dilution of control as new shareholders come on board, potentially posing a risk of takeover. This loss of control could make decision-making more complex and hinder effective management of the company.
It is important to consider the cost and time involved in arranging the issuance of new shares. This process can be resource-intensive and may divert attention from other critical business activities. Additionally, shareholders who invest in new shares may expect dividends, which could add to the company's financial obligations in the future.
Justified Decision:
In conclusion, issuing new shares can be a better way for a limited company to finance expansion than using a bank loan. The permanent source of capital, access to greater amounts of funds, and avoidance of interest payments make new shares an attractive option. However, the potential loss of control, costs, time, and shareholder expectations of dividends should also be carefully considered. Overall, the decision should be based on the company's long-term financial strategy, growth objectives, and risk tolerance.