top of page

A level and O level ECONOMICS 

Access 400+ Economics Essays With the Economics Study Pack 
(Free previews below!)

What if you could score the highest grades possible on your economics essays? Subscribe and get access to a collection of high-quality A+ economics essays.

  • Well structured

  • Simple and clear english

  • Diagrams included where relevant

  • For A level, AS level, GCSEs and O level.

Government Intervention and Demerit Goods

Discuss whether or not government intervention will correct the market failure caused by a demerit good.


Public Finance and Government Intervention

Frequently asked question



Use abbreviations or acronyms when appropriate to save time.

➡Title: Government Intervention in Correcting Market Failure Caused by Demerit Goods
🍃Introduction: Market failure occurs when the free market mechanism fails to allocate resources efficiently, resulting in a suboptimal outcome for society. Demerit goods, such as tobacco, alcohol, and certain drugs, are products that generate negative externalities and can lead to market failures. This essay examines whether government intervention is effective in addressing the market failure caused by demerit goods.
Government Intervention to Correct Market Failure:
➡️1. Imposing or Increasing Taxes: The government can intervene by imposing or increasing taxes on demerit goods. By levying taxes, the price of these goods increases, making them less affordable and dissuading consumption. Higher prices can reduce the demand for demerit goods, especially if demand is price elastic. Tax revenues generated can be used to fund public health campaigns, treatment programs, and other initiatives to address the negative consequences associated with demerit goods.
➡️2. Better Information and Awareness: Government intervention can involve raising public awareness about the negative impacts of demerit goods. Through education campaigns and informational programs, consumers can become better informed about the health risks and social costs associated with consuming these goods. Increased awareness may lead to changes in preferences and a decrease in demand for demerit goods, aligning consumer choices with the overall well-being of society.
➡️3. Imposing Minimum Prices: Setting a minimum price for demerit goods is another approach to government intervention. By establishing a price floor above the equilibrium level, the government aims to discourage consumption. However, the effectiveness of minimum prices depends on demand elasticity. If demand is price inelastic, individuals may continue to purchase demerit goods even at higher prices, limiting the impact of this intervention.
➡️4. Import Restrictions: Governments can impose restrictions on the imports of demerit goods to reduce their availability and consumption. Limiting the supply of these goods can make them less accessible and reduce their overall consumption within the domestic market. However, import restrictions should be carefully implemented to avoid unintended consequences such as the growth of black markets or increased production of substitute products.
Challenges and Limitations of Government Intervention:
➡️1. Price Inelasticity and Addictive Nature: Demand for demerit goods, such as addictive substances, may be price inelastic. Inelastic demand means that individuals are less responsive to price changes, making it challenging for taxes or minimum prices to significantly reduce consumption. The addictive nature of some demerit goods can further complicate efforts to curb demand through price-based interventions.
➡️2. Taxation Effectiveness: The effectiveness of taxes depends on the tax rate set by the government. If taxes are too low, they may not sufficiently deter consumption. Conversely, if taxes are set too high, they may create unintended consequences, such as black market activities or smuggling. Additionally, the burden of taxation may not equally affect all individuals, as wealthier individuals may be less deterred by higher taxes.
➡️3. Producer Behavior: Producers of demerit goods may not always pass on the full burden of taxes to consumers. They may absorb a portion of the tax themselves or reduce their profit margins. This behavior can limit the effectiveness of taxes in reducing consumption.
➡️4. Minimum Price Limitations: Setting a minimum price below the equilibrium level may have no effect on reducing consumption. If the minimum price is not set at a level that significantly increases costs for producers or reduces affordability for consumers, it may not lead to the desired reduction in demand.
👉Conclusion: Government intervention can play a role in correcting market failures caused by demerit goods. Strategies such as taxation, information campaigns, minimum prices, and import restrictions can be effective in reducing consumption and addressing the negative externalities associated with demerit goods. However, challenges exist, including price inelastic demand,


I. 🍃Introduction
- Brief explanation of the topic
- Importance of understanding the impact of taxes on demerit goods

II. Imposing Taxes on Demerit Goods
- Explanation of how taxes can be imposed or increased
- The effect of taxes on the price of demerit goods
- The impact of consumer awareness on the demand for demerit goods
- The expected contraction of demand due to taxes

III. Minimum Price Imposition
- Explanation of how a minimum price can be imposed
- The expected reduction of demand due to minimum price imposition
- The potential limitations of minimum price imposition

IV. Restrictions on Imports of Demerit Goods
- Explanation of how restrictions can be imposed on imports of demerit goods
- The expected impact of import restrictions on demand for demerit goods

V. Reasons Why Taxes Might Not Work
- The potential price inelasticity of demand for demerit goods
- The addictive nature of some demerit goods
- The possibility of the government setting taxes too high or too low
- The potential for the rich to be unaffected by taxes
- The possibility of producers not passing on taxes to consumers
- The limitations of minimum price imposition
- The potential for a surplus resulting from minimum price imposition

VI. 👉Conclusion
- Summary of the main points
- The importance of considering the potential limitations of taxes on demerit goods


• tax can be imposed/increased
• this will raise price
• consumers better informed about negative impact
• demand would be expected to contract
• a minimum price could be imposed
• this again would be expected to reduce demand
• restrictions could be imposed on the imports of demerit goods Why it might not:
• demand may be price inelastic, some demerit goods are addictive
• the government may set a tax too high or too low
• the rich may not be dissuaded by the tax
• producers may not pass on the tax to consumers
• a minimum price set below the equilibrium level would have no effect
• a minimum price could result in a surplus which may put downward pressure on price, encourage producers to charge less than the minimum price




Halftone Image of a Hand

The above material is protected and is not to be copied.

bottom of page