top of page

A level and O level ECONOMICS 

Access 400+ Economics Essays With the Economics Study Pack 
(Free previews below!)

What if you could score the highest grades possible on your economics essays? Subscribe and get access to a collection of high-quality A+ economics essays.

  • Well structured

  • Simple and clear english

  • Diagrams included where relevant

  • For A level, AS level, GCSEs and O level.

Net Emigration and Its Effect on Poverty

Discuss whether or not net emigration will reduce poverty in a country.


Demographic Factors and Population

Frequently asked question



Use strong and persuasive arguments to support your thesis statement.

Net emigration can have both positive and negative effects on poverty in a country.

Why it might reduce poverty:
➡️1. Remittances: Net emigration can result in money being sent back home in the form of remittances. These remittances can increase the income of families left behind, allowing them to afford basic necessities and potentially lift them out of poverty.
➡️2. Skill acquisition and return migration: Emigration can provide individuals with opportunities to acquire new skills and experiences. When they return to their home country, they may bring back these skills, which can contribute to increased productivity, job creation, and overall economic development. This can ultimately help reduce poverty.
➡️3. Increased wages: To retain workers, especially in sectors experiencing net emigration, wages may need to be raised. Higher wages can improve the income levels of workers and their families, potentially reducing poverty rates.
➡️4. Resource utilization: In countries facing overpopulation or resource constraints, net emigration can lead to better resource utilization. With fewer people to support, available resources can be allocated more effectively, potentially improving living conditions and reducing poverty rates.
➡️5. Reduced dependency: Emigration of older individuals can reduce the dependency ratio, resulting in lower costs for pensions and healthcare. This can free up resources to be allocated to other areas, potentially benefiting those in poverty.

Why it might not reduce poverty:
➡️1. Output and tax revenue: Net emigration can lead to a decrease in the country's output and productivity, which can subsequently lower tax revenue. Reduced tax revenue can limit the government's ability to implement poverty reduction programs and invest in social services.
➡️2. Brain drain: If skilled workers are the ones primarily emigrating, it can lead to a loss of human capital and discourage multinational corporations from investing in the country. This can impede economic growth and development, potentially perpetuating poverty.
➡️3. Dependence on government benefits: If the emigration of workers leaves their dependents relying on government benefits, it can strain public resources and social welfare systems. This can create challenges in providing adequate support for those in poverty.
➡️4. Underutilization of resources: In countries that are already underpopulated or experiencing a shortage of labor, net emigration can exacerbate resource underutilization. Lack of available workforce can limit economic growth and opportunities for poverty reduction.
It is important to note that the impact of net emigration on poverty is complex and context-specific. Factors such as the skills of emigrants, the destination countries' policies, the existence of safety nets, and the overall economic conditions of the country all play a role in determining the effects on poverty reduction.


I. 🍃Introduction
- Definition of net emigration of workers
- Importance of understanding its effects

II. Reasons why net emigration of workers might have positive effects
- Remittances sent home can increase income of families
- Ideas brought back by workers can improve skills and raise output
- Higher wages may be offered to retain workers
- Better use of resources in overpopulated countries
- Reduced dependency and lower costs for pensions and healthcare

III. Reasons why net emigration of workers might have negative effects
- Reduced output can lower tax revenue and government spending
- Discouragement of MNCs due to loss of skilled workers
- Dependents left relying on government benefits
- Worse use of resources in underpopulated countries

IV. 👉Conclusion
- Summary of positive and negative effects
- Importance of considering both sides when analyzing net emigration of workers.


Up to ➡️5 marks for why it might: Net emigration of workers - may result in money (remittances) being set home - such remittances may increase the income of their families - allowing them to buy basic necessities -. Net emigration may result in ideas being set home - workers may later return with better skills - raising the country’s output - increasing employment -. Wages may be raised - to retain workers -. If a country is overpopulated - net emigration may enable there to be better use of resources -. Net emigration of older people - may reduce dependency - lower cost of pensions - lower healthcare costs -. Net emigration of unemployed/low-paid workers may reduce the number living in poverty -.
Up to ➡️5 marks for why it might not: Net emigration of workers may reduce output - this could lower tax revenue - reduce the revenue the government can spend on lowering unemployment -. Net emigration of skilled workers may discourage MNCs setting up in the country - lowering potential output/income -. Net emigration of workers may leave their dependents relying on government benefits -. If a country is underpopulated - net emigration may mean there is worse use of resources -




Halftone Image of a Hand

The above material is protected and is not to be copied.

bottom of page