top of page

A level and O level ECONOMICS 

Access 400+ Economics Essays With the Economics Study Pack 
(Free previews below!)

What if you could score the highest grades possible on your economics essays? Subscribe and get access to a collection of high-quality A+ economics essays.

  • Well structured

  • Simple and clear english

  • Diagrams included where relevant

  • For A level, AS level, GCSEs and O level.

 

www.toolazytostudy.com.png

The Impact of Separating Ownership and Control in Firms

Discuss how the divorce of ownership from control may affect both the conduct and performance of firms.

Category:

Firm Behavior and Strategies

Frequently asked question

tgu9i.PNG

Answer

Review the essay for logical flow and ensure that ideas are presented in a sequential manner.

➡Title: The Impact of the Divorce of Ownership from Control on Firms' Conduct and Performance
🍃Introduction
The divorce of ownership from control refers to the separation of those who own a firm from those who manage and operate it. This phenomenon has become increasingly common as companies grow and owners delegate management responsibilities to professional executives. In this essay, we will discuss how this separation affects the conduct and performance of firms, touching on the principal-agent problem, the objectives pursued by firms, and the mechanisms in place to address these issues.
The Divorce of Ownership from Control
The traditional assumption in economics is that firms aim to maximize profits. However, as companies grow, owners often delegate the management of their firms to professional executives to focus on strategic decisions. This creates a situation where the owners (principals) and the managers (agents) may have different objectives, leading to a principal-agent problem. This divergence in objectives may impact both the conduct and performance of firms.
Impact on Conduct
The separation of ownership from control can lead managers to pursue objectives other than profit maximization, such as revenue maximization, sales growth maximization, and satisficing (achieving satisfactory performance rather than maximizing profits). This can occur when managers prioritize their own interests, such as career progression or personal recognition, over the owners' interests. The conduct of firms may also be influenced by a desire to maximize their own utility, which can include factors like job security, status, and other perks.
Impact on Performance
The pursuit of objectives other than profit maximization can have significant implications for the performance of firms. For example, firms may experience reduced efficiency, as resources are allocated to projects that do not maximize value for the owners. Additionally, the focus on objectives other than profit maximization can lead to diseconomies of scale, where the average cost of production increases as the firm grows. This may result in weaker financial performance indicators, such as lower profits or a reduced market share.
Comparisons Between Firm Types
Family firms, listed firms, and other types of organizations may experience the divorce of ownership from control to different extents. In family firms, the alignment of interests between owners and managers may be stronger due to familial ties, leading to a lower likelihood of principal-agent problems. In contrast, listed firms and large organizations with dispersed ownership may face more significant issues in aligning the objectives of owners and managers.
Addressing the Principal-Agent Problem
Owners can take several steps to address the principal-agent problem and better align the objectives of managers with their own. These include designing remuneration schemes that tie compensation to performance, such as payment in shares or performance-related pay. Additionally, many owners maintain some control over firms through seats on boards and voting on key decisions during annual general meetings.
👉Conclusion
The divorce of ownership from control can have significant implications for the conduct and performance of firms, often leading to the pursuit of objectives other than profit maximization and a divergence of interests between owners and managers. However, various mechanisms exist to mitigate these effects and better align the objectives of principals and agents. Overall, the impact of the separation of ownership from control on the conduct and performance of firms is significant, but it can be managed through proper governance and incentive structures.

rurtrrutu.PNG

I. 🍃Introduction
- Brief overview of the topic
- Importance of understanding the divorce of ownership from control

II. Explanation of the divorce of ownership from control
- Definition of ownership and control
- Historical context of the separation
- Implications for firms

III. Conduct and performance of firms
- Definition of conduct and performance
- Traditional theories of the firm
- Objectives of firms (profit maximisation, revenue maximisation, sales growth maximisation, satisficing)

IV. Principal-agent problem
- Explanation of the problem
- Impact on firms
- Examples

V. Effects on conduct of firms
- Pursuing objectives other than profit maximisation
- Deviation from owners' wishes
- Examples

VI. Effects on performance of firms
- Impact on efficiency
- Diseconomies of scale
- Financial performance indicators (profits/market share)
- Examples

VII. Comparisons between types of firms
- Family firms
- Listed firms
- Other types of organisations

VIII. Addressing the principal-agent problem
- Designing remuneration schemes
- Payment in shares
- Performance-related pay

IX. Shareholder involvement
- Owners' involvement in controlling firms
- Small shareholders' opportunities to vote on key decisions

X. Examples
- Real-life examples of the divorce of ownership from control

XI. 👉Conclusion
- Overall view on the impact of the divorce of ownership from control on the conduct and performance of firms
- Implications for future research and practice.

lkml.PNG


Areas for discussion include:
• explanation of the divorce of ownership from control
• explanation of what is meant by conduct and performance of firms
• traditional theories of the firm rest on the assumption that firms are profit maximising
• explanation of the profit-maximising condition and discussion of other objectives such as revenue maximisation, sales growth maximisation and satisficing
• for all but the smallest firms, the owners are not the same economic agents as the managers and workers, leading to a classic principal-agent problem
• explanation of how the divorce of ownership from control affects the conduct of firms, eg pursuing objectives other than profit maximisation, as agents deviate from wishes of owners
• explanation of how the divorce of ownership from control affects the performance of firms, eg impact on efficiency, diseconomies of scale, and thus financial performance indicators such as profits/market share
• comparisons between family firms, listed firms and other types of organisations
• discussion of how owners may address the principal-agent problem by designing remuneration schemes to align objectives, eg payment in shares, use of performance-related pay
• discussion of how many owners are actively involved in controlling firms via seats on boards, and even small shareholders have opportunities to vote on key decisions made by the board at annual general meetings
• use of examples
• overall view on whether the divorce of ownership from control has a significant impact on the conduct and performance of firms.

lkml.PNG

lkml.PNG

lkml.PNG

Halftone Image of a Hand

The above material is protected and is not to be copied.

bottom of page