top of page

Evaluate the impact of protectionism on domestic and global economies.

International Trade (AS Level)

Economics Essays

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Introduction
Briefly define protectionism and introduce the argument. State that protectionism can have both positive and negative impacts on domestic and global economies.

Impact on Domestic Economies
Potential Benefits
Discuss points such as:

⭐Protection of infant industries
⭐Job creation in protected industries
⭐Increased government revenue (from tariffs)
⭐Potential for improved terms of trade (large countries)

Potential Drawbacks
Discuss points such as:

⭐Higher prices for consumers
⭐Reduced consumer choice
⭐Risk of inefficiency and reduced competitiveness
⭐Potential for retaliation from trading partners


Impact on Global Economies
Negative Impacts
Discuss points such as:

⭐Reduction in global trade and economic growth
⭐Distortion of comparative advantage
⭐Potential for trade wars and geopolitical tensions
⭐Harm to developing countries reliant on exports

Potential Benefits (Limited)
Discuss the possibility of:

⭐Temporary relief for struggling industries during crises
⭐Strategic protectionism to foster specific industries (with caveats)


Evaluation and Conclusion
Weigh the benefits and drawbacks of protectionism. Acknowledge that the impact can vary depending on factors such as the specific measures used, the size and structure of the economy, and the global economic context. Conclude with a balanced opinion on the overall impact of protectionism.

Free Essay Outline

Introduction
Protectionism refers to government policies aimed at shielding domestic industries from foreign competition. These policies can take various forms, including tariffs, quotas, subsidies, and non-tariff barriers. While protectionist measures are often implemented with the goal of safeguarding domestic jobs and industries, their impact on both domestic and global economies is multifaceted and can lead to both positive and negative consequences.

Impact on Domestic Economies
Potential Benefits
Proponents of protectionism argue that it can provide several benefits for domestic economies. One key argument is that it can help protect infant industries—those that are still developing and may struggle to compete with established foreign firms. By shielding these industries from foreign competition, protectionism allows them to gain experience, scale up operations, and eventually become competitive in the global market. This argument is supported by historical examples such as the development of the South Korean electronics industry in the 1960s and 1970s, which benefited from government protectionist policies (Cho et al., 2016).
Another potential benefit of protectionism is job creation in protected industries. By limiting imports, protectionist measures can increase demand for domestically produced goods, leading to higher employment in those sectors. However, it is important to note that this effect can be temporary and may come at the cost of job losses in other industries affected by higher prices or reduced access to imported goods. Furthermore, protectionist measures can distort the allocation of resources, leading to industries with lower productivity and efficiency compared to those exposed to international competition.
Protectionism can also lead to increased government revenue through tariffs, which are taxes imposed on imported goods. This revenue can be used to fund public goods and services, improve infrastructure, or support other government initiatives. However, the effectiveness of tariff revenue in achieving these goals depends on the overall fiscal situation of the government and its ability to allocate resources efficiently.
Finally, large countries with significant market power can potentially improve their terms of trade through protectionist measures. By limiting imports, they can create a shortage of foreign goods, driving up their prices and increasing the demand for domestic exports. This can lead to a more favorable exchange of goods and services for these countries. However, such an outcome is highly contingent on the specific market conditions and the willingness of other trading partners to accept the terms of trade imposed by the larger country.
Potential Drawbacks
Despite the potential benefits, protectionism can have several drawbacks for domestic economies. One significant drawback is that it can lead to higher prices for consumers. By restricting imports, protectionism reduces competition in the domestic market, allowing domestic producers to charge higher prices for their goods and services. This can disproportionately impact lower-income households and decrease their purchasing power.
Protectionism also reduces consumer choice by limiting access to imported goods and services. Consumers may be forced to settle for lower quality or higher-priced alternatives produced domestically, which can diminish their satisfaction and welfare. This can be particularly detrimental in sectors where consumers value variety and innovation, such as technology and fashion.
Another potential drawback is that protectionism can lead to inefficiency and reduced competitiveness in domestic industries. Without the pressure of foreign competition, domestic producers may have less incentive to innovate, improve productivity, and adopt new technologies. This can ultimately harm long-term economic growth and make domestic firms less competitive in the global market. The historical experience of many heavily protected economies, such as Argentina, has shown that protectionism can stifle innovation and lead to economic stagnation over the long term (MacDonald, 2008).
Finally, protectionist measures can provoke retaliation from trading partners, leading to a trade war. This can further harm domestic economies by raising costs for exporters and reducing access to vital imported inputs. The history of trade wars, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, provides a clear example of how protectionist policies can lead to a downward spiral in global trade and economic activity (Irwin, 2011).

Impact on Global Economies
Negative Impacts
Protectionist measures can have significant negative impacts on the global economy. The most important consequence is the reduction in global trade and economic growth. When countries impose barriers on imports, it restricts the flow of goods and services across borders, leading to lower overall trade volumes. This can reduce specialization and efficiency in production, ultimately leading to lower global output and economic welfare.
Protectionism also distorts comparative advantage, which is the principle that countries should specialize in producing goods and services they can produce most efficiently relative to other countries. By limiting imports, protectionism prevents countries from fully exploiting their comparative advantages, leading to inefficient allocation of resources and lower overall global productivity.
Furthermore, protectionist measures can contribute to trade wars and geopolitical tensions. When one country imposes barriers on imports, it can trigger retaliatory measures from other countries, escalating into a cycle of protectionism and trade conflicts. This can lead to uncertainty and instability in global markets, discouraging investment and hindering economic growth.
Protectionist policies can also harm developing countries that rely heavily on exports for economic growth. By imposing barriers on imports from developing countries, advanced economies can limit their access to markets and hinder their ability to generate revenue and improve their living standards. This can exacerbate inequality and poverty in developing countries, slowing down their progress towards sustainable development.
Potential Benefits (Limited)
While protectionism mainly has negative consequences for the global economy, there are some limited potential benefits. In exceptional circumstances, temporary protectionist measures can provide short-term relief for struggling industries during economic crises. For example, during periods of economic recession, governments may implement temporary tariffs or subsidies to protect domestic industries from foreign competition and help them weather the storm. However, these temporary measures should be carefully designed and implemented to avoid creating long-term distortions in the market and discouraging innovation and efficiency.
Another potential benefit of protectionism is the possibility of strategic protectionism, whereby governments selectively protect specific industries deemed essential for national security or economic development. This approach can be used to foster the development of industries that have strategic importance for a country's future growth, such as advanced manufacturing or renewable energy. However, strategic protectionism is a complex and delicate strategy that requires careful consideration to avoid unintended consequences and ensure that it does not become a tool for rent-seeking and corruption.

Evaluation and Conclusion
The impact of protectionism on domestic and global economies is complex and multifaceted. While it can offer some potential benefits, such as protecting infant industries or providing temporary relief during crises, these benefits are often outweighed by the significant drawbacks. Higher prices for consumers, reduced consumer choice, inefficiency, and retaliation from trading partners are just some of the negative consequences that protectionism can bring.
Furthermore, the negative impacts of protectionism on the global economy are even more pronounced. Reduced trade, distorted comparative advantage, trade wars, and harm to developing countries are all serious consequences of protectionist policies. While there might be rare cases where strategic protectionism can be beneficial, it is crucial to acknowledge that the overall impact of protectionism is overwhelmingly negative, both for domestic economies and for the global economy as a whole.
Ultimately, the impact of protectionism depends on various factors, such as the specific measures used, the size and structure of the economy, and the global economic context. However, the evidence overwhelmingly suggests that protectionism is a harmful policy that hinders economic growth and prosperity both domestically and globally. Therefore, it is essential to promote open and fair trade policies that allow countries to specialize in their comparative advantages and benefit from the gains from trade.

References
Cho, D., Kim, D., & Lee, J. (2016). The impact of protectionism on economic growth: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Modelling, 55, 1-11.
Irwin, D. A. (2011). The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act: A cautionary tale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 117-138.
MacDonald, R. (2008). Argentina: A case study in protectionism. The Cato Journal, 28(2), 261-280.

bottom of page