top of page

Describe the factors that contribute to the development of prejudice.

Social Approach

Psychology Essays

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Define prejudice, highlighting its affective, cognitive, and behavioural components. Briefly mention the widespread nature of prejudice and its impact.

Social Factors
Social Identity Theory: Explain how categorization into in-groups and out-groups leads to in-group bias and out-group homogeneity effect. Provide relevant studies/examples.
Social Learning Theory: Describe how prejudice is learned through observation, imitation, and reinforcement from parents, peers, and the media. Illustrate with examples.

Cognitive Factors
Cognitive Schemas: Explain how stereotypes, as cognitive schemas, influence information processing and perpetuate prejudice. Discuss the role of confirmation bias.
Realistic Conflict Theory: Explain how competition for limited resources can lead to intergroup hostility and prejudice. Provide historical or contemporary examples.

Emotional Factors
Scapegoat Theory: Describe how frustration and anger can be displaced onto out-groups, leading to prejudice. Illustrate with historical examples.
Personality: Briefly discuss personality traits like authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as predisposing factors for prejudice.

Summarize the main factors contributing to prejudice, emphasizing their interconnected nature. Briefly mention the challenges and potential solutions for reducing prejudice in society.

Free Essay

Prejudice is a preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable, towards a person or group, often without sufficient reason or knowledge. It encompasses an affective component (emotions and feelings), a cognitive component (beliefs and stereotypes), and a behavioral component (discrimination and prejudice actions). Prejudice is a pervasive social phenomenon with detrimental consequences for individuals and societies, leading to discrimination, conflict, and social injustice. This essay will explore the key factors that contribute to the development of prejudice, examining social, cognitive, and emotional influences.

Social Factors
Social Identity Theory
Social Identity Theory, proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner (1979), provides a framework for understanding how group membership shapes individuals' self-concept and intergroup relations. According to this theory, people strive to maintain a positive social identity, which is derived from their membership in various social groups. This desire for a positive social identity leads to in-group favoritism, where individuals show preferential treatment towards members of their own group, and out-group discrimination, where individuals treat members of other groups less favorably. The out-group homogeneity effect, another key concept within Social Identity Theory, suggests that people perceive members of out-groups as more similar to each other than they actually are. This perceived similarity contributes to the formation of stereotypes and biases against out-groups. Studies like the minimal group paradigm, where participants were randomly assigned to groups based on arbitrary criteria, have demonstrated the powerful effects of group membership on intergroup attitudes and behavior (Tajfel et al., 1971).
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory, proposed by Albert Bandura (1977), emphasizes the role of social learning in shaping individuals' attitudes and behaviors, including prejudice. According to this theory, people learn prejudice through observation, imitation, and reinforcement from parents, peers, and significant others. For example, children may learn prejudice from observing their parents' discriminatory behavior or hearing their prejudiced comments. Similarly, exposure to media portrayals of certain groups in negative or stereotypical ways can contribute to the development of prejudiced attitudes. Reinforcement, such as praise or approval for expressing prejudiced views, further strengthens these attitudes. Social Learning Theory highlights the importance of early socialization and the role of social environments in shaping individuals' perceptions and beliefs about different groups.

Cognitive Factors
Cognitive Schemas
Cognitive schemas are mental frameworks that organize our knowledge about the world and guide our information processing. Stereotypes, as cognitive schemas, act as mental shortcuts, providing simplified representations of groups of people. They often include overgeneralizations, exaggerations, and negative attributes. These stereotypes can influence our perceptions and interpretations of information, leading us to selectively attend to and remember information that confirms our existing beliefs, while ignoring or downplaying information that contradicts them. This confirmation bias reinforces our prejudiced attitudes and makes it difficult to change them. For example, a person with a negative stereotype about a particular ethnic group may interpret the behavior of members of that group in a more negative light, even if their behavior is neutral or positive.
Realistic Conflict Theory
Realistic Conflict Theory, developed by Muzafer Sherif (1966), emphasizes the role of competition for scarce resources in driving intergroup conflict and prejudice. When groups compete for limited resources, such as jobs, land, or political power, they may develop hostile attitudes and discriminatory behaviors towards each other. These conflicts can lead to prejudice and discrimination as groups strive to secure their own interests at the expense of others. Historical examples, such as the conflict between European settlers and Native Americans in North America or the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, illustrate how competition over resources can exacerbate tensions and contribute to prejudice.

Emotional Factors
Scapegoat Theory
The Scapegoat Theory, proposed by John Dollard et al. (1939), suggests that prejudice can arise from a need to displace frustration and anger onto an out-group. When individuals experience frustration or negative emotions due to personal or societal setbacks, they may direct their aggression towards a weaker or more vulnerable group that is easy to blame. This scapegoating serves as a psychological defense mechanism, allowing individuals to channel their negative emotions onto an external target. For example, during times of economic hardship, prejudice against immigrants may increase as people look for someone to blame for their problems. The rise of scapegoating during periods of social unrest or economic instability demonstrates the powerful role of emotions in fueling prejudice.
Certain personality traits, such as authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, have been linked to increased levels of prejudice (Adorno et al., 1950; Pratto et al., 1994). Authoritarianism is characterized by a rigid adherence to conventional values, a strong belief in authority figures, and a tendency to view the world in black and white terms. People with high authoritarianism scores are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes towards groups that challenge traditional values or social hierarchies. Social dominance orientation, on the other hand, reflects a desire for intergroup dominance and a belief that certain groups are superior to others. Individuals with high social dominance orientation scores are more likely to endorse policies and practices that maintain social hierarchies and legitimize inequality. These personality traits can predispose individuals to develop and maintain prejudiced attitudes.

The development of prejudice is a complex process influenced by a multitude of factors. Social factors, such as group membership and social learning, play a crucial role in shaping individuals' attitudes and behaviors towards different groups. Cognitive factors, such as stereotypes and the confirmation bias, can reinforce and perpetuate prejudiced beliefs. Emotional factors, including frustration and anger, can further fuel prejudice and discrimination. Reducing prejudice requires addressing these factors at multiple levels, including promoting intergroup contact, challenging stereotypes, and fostering empathy and understanding. While prejudice remains a persistent challenge in society, understanding its multifaceted origins is crucial for developing effective strategies for combating its harmful effects.

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). <i>The authoritarian personality</i>. Harper & Row.
Bandura, A. (1977) <i>Social learning theory.</i> Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). <i>Frustration and aggression</i>. Yale University Press.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</i>, 67(4), 741-763.
Sherif, M. (1966). <i>In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation</i>. Houghton Mifflin.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), <i>The social psychology of intergroup relations</i> (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. <i>European Journal of Social Psychology</i>, 1(2), 149-178.

bottom of page