top of page

Discuss the nature versus nurture debate in psychology.

Issues and Debates

Psychology Essays

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Define the nature vs. nurture debate. Briefly introduce the historical context of the debate. State your argument - will you lean towards one side or argue for an interactionist approach?

Nature: Biological Influences
Genetics: Discuss how genes influence behavior, using examples like twin studies, family studies, and specific genes linked to psychological traits.
Neurotransmitters and Hormones: Explain the role of neurochemicals in behavior, cognition, and emotion.
Evolutionary Psychology: Briefly introduce how evolutionary pressures may have shaped certain human behaviors.

Nurture: Environmental Influences
Early Childhood Experiences: Explain the importance of early experiences on development, referencing attachment theory and potential long-term impacts.
Social Learning Theory: Discuss how observation and imitation contribute to learning behaviors, referencing Bandura's Bobo doll experiment.
Culture and Society: Analyze how cultural norms and societal expectations shape individual behaviors and beliefs.

The Interactionist Approach
Explain that most psychologists believe in an interaction between nature and nurture. Provide examples like diathesis-stress model (genetic vulnerability triggered by environment) and epigenetics (environment influencing gene expression). Briefly mention how research methods are moving towards understanding this complex interplay.

Summarize the main arguments presented. Restate your stance on the debate, emphasizing the complexity and the need for an interactionist perspective in understanding human behavior.

Free Essay

The nature versus nurture debate is a long-standing discussion in psychology that explores the relative contributions of innate biological factors (nature) and environmental influences (nurture) in shaping human behavior and development. This debate has roots in ancient philosophical discussions and continues to be a topic of ongoing research and debate. In this essay, I will argue that while both nature and nurture play significant roles, the interactionist approach offers the most comprehensive understanding of human behavior. This approach recognizes that genetic predisposition and environmental factors work in concert, shaping an individual's unique characteristics and experiences.

Nature: Biological Influences
Genetics: Our genes, inherited from our parents, provide the blueprint for our physical and psychological characteristics. Twin studies, which compare the similarities between identical (monozygotic) and fraternal (dizygotic) twins, provide strong evidence for the influence of genetics on a wide range of traits, including intelligence (Bouchard et al., 1990), personality (Loehlin, 1992), and even psychological disorders like schizophrenia (Gottesman, 1991). Family studies, which examine the prevalence of traits within families, further support the role of genetics. Moreover, advances in molecular genetics are identifying specific genes associated with certain behaviors and disorders, such as the MAOA gene linked to aggression (Caspi et al., 2002).
Neurotransmitters and Hormones: Our brains are comprised of billions of neurons that communicate through chemical messengers called neurotransmitters. These neurochemicals play crucial roles in regulating mood, cognition, motivation, and behavior. For example, serotonin is associated with mood regulation, and imbalances in dopamine are implicated in disorders like Parkinson's disease and addiction. Hormones, like testosterone and estrogen, also exert profound influences on behavior, affecting aggression, sexuality, and social cognition (Dabbs, 1991).
Evolutionary Psychology: Evolutionary psychology proposes that our current behaviors and cognitive abilities are shaped by adaptive processes that helped our ancestors survive and reproduce. This perspective suggests that humans have innate predispositions towards certain behaviors, such as language acquisition, social bonding, and fear of dangerous stimuli (Buss, 2009).

Nurture: Environmental Influences
Early Childhood Experiences: The environment surrounding a child during their early years plays a crucial role in shaping their development. Attachment theory, proposed by John Bowlby, suggests that the quality of early attachment relationships has a profound impact on an individual's social and emotional development (Bowlby, 1969). Secure attachment, characterized by a trusting and responsive relationship with caregivers, is associated with greater emotional security, social competence, and resilience in later life. Conversely, insecure attachment, marked by anxiety or avoidance in relationships, can increase vulnerability to emotional distress and interpersonal difficulties.
Social Learning Theory: Albert Bandura's social learning theory emphasizes the importance of observational learning and imitation in acquiring new behaviors (Bandura, 1977). His famous Bobo doll experiment demonstrated that children who observed an adult behaving aggressively towards a doll were more likely to exhibit similar aggressive behavior themselves. Social learning theory highlights how cultural norms and social interactions contribute to the development of our beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors.
Culture and Society: Culture, encompassing shared beliefs, values, and customs, exerts a powerful influence on individuals' lives. Cultural norms and expectations shape our understanding of appropriate behavior, gender roles, social interactions, and even our perception of the world. For example, individualism vs. collectivism are cultural dimensions that influence personal goals, self-perception, and social relationships (Hofstede, 2001).

The Interactionist Approach
The most comprehensive view of human behavior acknowledges the dynamic interplay between nature and nurture. The diathesis-stress model, for example, proposes that individuals are genetically predisposed to certain disorders, but environmental stressors are needed to trigger their development. In this model, both a genetic vulnerability (diathesis) and an environmental trigger (stress) are necessary for the disorder to emerge (Zubin & Spring, 1977).
Epigenetics, a relatively new field of research, demonstrates that environmental factors can influence gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence (Meaney et al., 2004). Early childhood experiences, for example, can leave lasting epigenetic "marks" on our genes, influencing our vulnerability to stress, mental health, and even physical disease.
The interactionist approach recognizes the complexity of human development and behavior. Research is increasingly moving towards understanding the intricate interplay between genes and environment, utilizing advanced methodologies like twin studies, gene-environment interaction studies, and longitudinal research designs.

The nature versus nurture debate highlights the intricate relationship between biological factors and environmental influences in shaping human behavior. While both nature and nurture play significant roles, a purely deterministic view of either side is simplistic and inadequate. An interactionist approach offers the most nuanced and holistic understanding of human nature. The interaction between our genetic predispositions and our experiences, culture, and social environments creates the unique individuals we are. Future research should continue to explore the complex interplay between genes and environment, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive understanding of human behavior and development.


Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250(4978), 223-228.
Buss, D. M. (2009). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. New York: Pearson.
Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., ... & Poulton, R. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297(5582), 851-854.
Dabbs, J. M. Jr. (1991). Testosterone and social behavior. In R. E. Tremblay, D. Peer, & R. P. Vitaro (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 223–242). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gottesman, I. I. (1991). Schizophrenia genesis: The origins of madness. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and personality. American Psychologist, 47(12), 1285-1295.
Meaney, M. J., Szyf, M., & Seckl, J. R. (2004). Epigenetic mechanisms of stress and coping. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(6-7), 797-807.
Zubin, J., & Spring, B. (1977). Vulnerability: A new view of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(2), 103-126.

bottom of page