top of page

Explain Ball's perspective on parental choice and competition between schools.


Roles and Functions

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Outline: Ball's Perspective on Parental Choice and Competition Between Schools

This essay will explore sociologist Stephen Ball's perspective on parental choice and competition between schools, focusing on his insights into the implications for social stratification and educational inequalities.


⭐Briefly define parental choice and school competition.
⭐Introduce Ball's work as a key contributor to the understanding of these concepts.
⭐State the essay's argument: Ball argues that parental choice and school competition, while seemingly empowering, often contribute to social stratification and exacerbate educational inequalities.

Ball's Key Arguments

⭐The myth of 'empowerment': Examine Ball's argument that parental choice is often limited by factors like social class and cultural capital.

⭐Highlight the unequal distribution of resources and information.
⭐Explain how some parents are better equipped to navigate the educational system.

⭐Competition and marketization: Analyze Ball's critique of the marketization of education, where schools become "commodities" competing for students.

⭐Discuss the potential for schools to prioritize "marketable" students over others.
⭐Explain how competition can lead to a focus on exam results and a narrowing of the curriculum.

⭐Social stratification and inequalities: Explore Ball's view on how parental choice and competition contribute to the reproduction of existing social inequalities.

⭐Discuss how schools in affluent areas tend to attract higher-achieving students, creating a cycle of advantage.
⭐Highlight the potential for schools in disadvantaged areas to become "sink schools" with limited opportunities.


⭐Summarize Ball's key arguments about the limitations and negative consequences of parental choice and competition.
⭐Consider alternative approaches to education that address issues of equity and social justice.
⭐Offer your own concluding thoughts on the significance of Ball's work in understanding contemporary education policy.

Free Essay 

The Competitive Classroom: Ball's Perspective on Parental Choice and School Inequality

The concept of "parental choice" in education has become a dominant theme in many contemporary societies, particularly in the UK. This policy, often promoted as empowering parents and giving them greater control over their children's education, has been the subject of much debate amongst sociologists. Stephen Ball, a leading figure in the sociology of education, provides a particularly insightful and critical perspective on this issue, arguing that parental choice, in practice, often exacerbates existing inequalities within the education system.

Ball's primary argument is that parental choice, rather than leading to a more equitable system, actually reinforces existing class structures and inequalities. This is because, he argues, the very act of choosing a school is itself embedded within a complex web of social and cultural factors. Parents are not simply rational actors making informed decisions based on objective criteria. Instead, their choices are heavily influenced by their social class, economic resources, and cultural capital.

⭐⭐The Role of Class and Cultural Capital:⭐⭐

Ball highlights the role of social class in shaping parental choices. Middle-class parents, with greater access to information, resources, and networks, are better equipped to navigate the complex and often bureaucratic process of choosing a school. They are more likely to be aware of their options, understand the nuances of different school systems, and have the resources to provide their children with extra support, like private tutoring, to enhance their chances of getting into their preferred school.

Furthermore, Ball emphasizes the concept of "cultural capital," a term coined by Pierre Bourdieu. This refers to the knowledge, skills, and values that are valued within the education system and provide an advantage to those who possess them. Middle-class parents often possess a greater degree of cultural capital, which allows them to better understand the expectations of schools and effectively advocate for their children's needs. In contrast, working-class parents may lack the cultural capital and resources to navigate the system effectively, leading to them making choices that disadvantage their children.

⭐⭐Competition and the "Market" of Schools:⭐⭐

Ball also critiques the market-driven approach to education, arguing that it creates a system of competition between schools, with some schools becoming more desirable and others less so. This, he argues, leads to a "league table" effect, where schools are ranked based on their performance, often measured by exam results. This focus on league tables prioritizes high-achieving schools, while neglecting the needs of underperforming schools and those catering to students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

The competitive nature of the market also incentivizes schools to focus on attracting "high-achieving" students, often at the expense of other students. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle of inequality, where schools become segregated by social class and achievement, further entrenching existing inequalities.


Ball's work provides a powerful critique of the "parental choice" model in education, arguing that it can exacerbate existing inequalities and create a system of competitive advantage for those who already have access to resources. He emphasizes the need for a more equitable and inclusive education system that addresses the social and cultural factors that underpin educational inequality, rather than simply relying on market-based solutions.

While the debate around parental choice in education is complex, Ball's perspective offers a valuable lens through which to understand the potential pitfalls of this policy and the need for a more equitable approach to education that prioritizes the needs of all students, regardless of their background.

bottom of page