top of page

Explain Becker's interactionist perspective on the causes of deviance.


Crime and Deviance

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Becker's Interactionist Perspective on Deviance

This essay will examine Becker's interactionist perspective on the causes of deviance. It will explore the key concepts of labelling, the social construction of deviance, and the role of power in defining deviance.

The Labelling Theory

Discuss the concept of labelling and how it shapes perceptions of deviance.

Explain how labels can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies.

Social Construction of Deviance

Explain how deviance is not an inherent quality of an act but is socially constructed.

Provide examples to illustrate how the definition of deviance varies across cultures and time.

Role of Power in Defining Deviance

Explore how powerful groups, such as the police, lawmakers, and the media, play a role in defining deviance.

Discuss how power imbalances can lead to the labelling and criminalization of marginalized groups.

Criticisms of Becker's Theory

Briefly discuss criticisms of Becker's theory, such as its focus on labelling and its neglect of the underlying causes of deviance.


Summarize the key points of Becker's interactionist perspective on deviance and its significance in understanding the nature of crime and deviance.

Free Essay 

Labelling Theory and the Social Construction of Deviance: An Interactionist Perspective

Howard Becker, a prominent sociologist, offered a powerful critique of traditional understandings of deviance through his interactionist perspective. He argued that deviance isn't an inherent quality of an act, but rather a social construct, shaped by the interactions between individuals and society's powerful actors. Unlike theories that focus on individual predispositions, Becker's ⭐⭐labelling theory⭐⭐ emphasizes the role of social control agencies and their labels in creating deviance.

The key concept in Becker's theory is the ⭐⭐"social construction" of deviance⭐⭐. This means that actions are not inherently deviant; they become deviant when labeled as such by society. Consider, for example, the act of smoking marijuana. In some cultures, it's a recreational activity; in others, it's a serious crime. The act itself is the same, but the social reaction to it varies dramatically.

Becker argues that deviance isn't simply a matter of breaking rules; it's about the ⭐process of labelling⭐. This process involves two key actors:

⭐⭐1. The "Labeler":⭐⭐ Social control agencies, like the police, courts, and media, hold the power to define and label certain behaviors as deviant. They are often influenced by social norms, values, and societal power structures.
⭐⭐2. The "Labeled":⭐⭐ Individuals labeled as deviant are often marginalized and stigmatized. This label can have a profound impact on their self-identity, leading to further deviant behavior.

This labelling process unfolds in a series of stages:

⭐Primary Deviance:⭐⭐ This involves the initial act of deviance, which is often relatively minor and doesn't significantly impact the individual's self-concept. For instance, a teenager might try smoking marijuana once out of curiosity.
⭐Secondary Deviance:⭐⭐ This occurs when the individual accepts the label of "deviant" and begins to identify with it. The label becomes a master status, overshadowing other aspects of their identity. The individual may engage in more deviant acts as a consequence of being labeled.

Becker illustrates this dynamic with the concept of ⭐⭐"moral entrepreneurs."⭐⭐ These are individuals or groups who seek to change social norms by promoting the labelling of certain behaviors as deviant. For example, campaigns against drug use or the LGBTQ+ community often involve moral entrepreneurs advocating for stricter laws and social sanctions. Their efforts can lead to the creation of new categories of deviance and the expansion of social control.

Becker's theory has significant implications for understanding the nature of deviance and the role of power in its construction. It challenges traditional approaches that focus on individual characteristics and highlights the social processes that contribute to the creation of deviance.

⭐⭐Furthermore, Becker's work suggests that social control measures can sometimes have unintended consequences, leading to the very behavior they aim to prevent.⭐⭐ For instance, labelling someone as a criminal can push them towards further deviance, reinforcing their marginalization and increasing their likelihood of re-offending.

⭐⭐In conclusion, Becker's interactionist perspective provides a valuable framework for analyzing deviance. It emphasizes the social construction of deviance, highlighting the role of power, labelling, and social control in shaping how we define and respond to deviant behavior.⭐⭐ His work cautions us against simplistic explanations of deviance and encourages a critical examination of how societal structures and power dynamics contribute to the marginalization and stigmatization of certain groups.

bottom of page