top of page

Explain the functionalist theory of social stratification.


Social Stratification

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Functionalist Theory of Social Stratification

This essay will explain the functionalist theory of social stratification.


Define social stratification and its key features.

Functionalist Perspective

Explain the core principles of functionalism, emphasizing its focus on social order and stability.

Davis and Moore's Theory

Summarize Davis and Moore's theory, including their arguments about:

⭐Differential functional importance of roles
⭐Scarcity of talent and the need for motivation
⭐Unequal rewards as a means of motivating individuals to fill important roles

Key Features of the Functionalist Approach

Highlight the following aspects of the functionalist perspective:

⭐Social inequality is necessary for the smooth functioning of society.
⭐Rewards are based on merit and reflect individual contributions.
⭐Stratification serves to maintain social order by motivating people to work hard and compete.

Criticisms of Functionalism

Outline several criticisms of the functionalist theory of social stratification, including:

⭐Ignores the role of power and inequality in shaping social rewards.
⭐Fails to account for social mobility and the challenges faced by disadvantaged groups.
⭐Does not explain the persistence of poverty or the existence of unequal opportunities.


Summarize the main points of the essay, emphasizing the strengths and limitations of the functionalist theory of social stratification.

Free Essay 

The Functionalist Perspective on Social Stratification: A System in Balance

Social stratification, the hierarchical arrangement of individuals and groups within a society based on factors like wealth, power, and prestige, is a pervasive feature of human societies. While its existence is undeniable, understanding its purpose and function has sparked debate among sociologists. One prominent perspective, functionalism, argues that social stratification serves crucial functions for society's stability and overall well-being.

⭐⭐The Core Argument: Roles and Rewards⭐⭐

Functionalist theory, rooted in the works of Emile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons, views society as a complex system where every element contributes to its stability and smooth functioning. According to this framework, social stratification emerges as a mechanism to ensure that the most important roles and positions in society are filled by the most qualified individuals. This principle operates on the basis of "⭐⭐functional importance⭐⭐" and "⭐⭐scarcity of talent⭐⭐."

⭐Functional Importance:⭐⭐ Certain roles within a society are considered more vital than others. For example, doctors, scientists, and engineers are typically viewed as more crucial to societal well-being compared to, say, a cashier or a construction worker.
⭐Scarcity of Talent:⭐⭐ The talent and skills necessary to perform these vital roles are not evenly distributed among the population. Only a select few possess the intellect, motivation, and ability to excel in complex and demanding professions.

To incentivize individuals to dedicate themselves to these crucial roles, society offers higher rewards in the form of wealth, power, and prestige. This creates a hierarchy where those occupying the highest positions, having demonstrated superior skills and dedication, are justly rewarded with greater material resources and social recognition.

⭐⭐Positive Consequences of Stratification:⭐⭐

Functionalists argue that this system provides several benefits:

⭐Motivation and Productivity:⭐⭐ The promise of greater rewards motivates individuals to pursue education, develop their skills, and strive for excellence in their chosen fields. This leads to a more productive and innovative society.
⭐Talent Allocation:⭐⭐ By offering incentives for the most talented individuals to fill the most important roles, society ensures that its resources are utilized effectively and efficiently.
⭐Social Stability:⭐⭐ A hierarchical system provides a sense of order and predictability, reducing social unrest and fostering cooperation.

⭐⭐Criticisms and Limitations:⭐⭐

While the functionalist perspective offers a compelling explanation for the existence of social stratification, it has faced significant criticism. Critics argue that:

⭐Circular Reasoning:⭐⭐ The theory assumes that the most important roles are the most highly rewarded, but it doesn't explain how these roles are defined or why they are considered more important in the first place.
⭐Ignoring Inequality:⭐⭐ Functionalism downplays the ethical implications of inequality and the potential for exploitation and oppression inherent in a stratified system. The theory doesn't adequately address the potential for social injustice and the negative consequences of poverty and social exclusion.
⭐Lack of Empirical Support:⭐⭐ Many studies have shown that social mobility is often limited and that individuals' positions in the social structure are heavily influenced by factors beyond their personal merit, such as family background and inherited wealth.


The functionalist perspective provides a useful framework for understanding the social purpose of stratification, emphasizing its role in motivating individuals and efficiently allocating talent. However, its reliance on the assumption of a just and meritocratic system has been challenged by critics who point to the inherent inequalities and disadvantages that can arise from a stratified society. Understanding both the merits and limitations of the functionalist argument is crucial for engaging in a nuanced and critical analysis of social stratification and its impact on individuals and societies.

bottom of page