top of page

Evaluate the effectiveness of sanctions in ensuring conformity.


Social control, conformity and resistance

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Briefly define sanctions and their purpose in relation to social control and conformity. Introduce the argument that while sanctions can be effective, their effectiveness is debatable and contingent on various factors.

Positive Sanctions and Their Effectiveness
Define positive sanctions and provide examples (e.g., awards, recognition). Discuss how they promote conformity by incentivizing desirable behaviours. Briefly mention potential limitations (e.g., subjective value of rewards).

Negative Sanctions and Their Effectiveness
Define negative sanctions and provide examples (e.g., fines, imprisonment). Analyze how they discourage deviance through punishment and deterrence. Critically evaluate their effectiveness, considering factors like:

⭐ Severity of the sanction
⭐ Certainty of punishment
⭐ Individual differences and motivations

The Role of Informal Sanctions
Define informal sanctions and contrast them with formal sanctions. Discuss their significance in shaping everyday behavior through socialization and social pressure. Use examples (e.g., shame, ostracism) to illustrate their impact.

Limitations of Sanctions in Achieving Conformity
Explore the limitations of sanctions, focusing on:

⭐ The potential for resistance and rebellion
⭐ The difficulty in addressing underlying social issues
⭐ The possibility of unintended consequences (e.g., labeling theory)

Summarize the argument, acknowledging that sanctions can be effective in achieving conformity to some extent. However, emphasize that their effectiveness is limited by various factors and that they are not a guaranteed solution for ensuring conformity. Suggest that a more holistic approach considering both formal and informal social control mechanisms alongside addressing underlying societal issues may be more effective.

Free Essay 

Sanctions are mechanisms of social control that aim to ensure conformity to societal norms and values. They are used to encourage desired behaviours and discourage deviant ones, ultimately contributing to the maintenance of social order. While sanctions can be effective in achieving conformity, their effectiveness is debatable and contingent on various factors. This essay will explore the effectiveness of positive and negative sanctions, the role of informal sanctions, and the limitations of sanctions in achieving conformity.

Positive Sanctions and Their Effectiveness
Positive sanctions are rewards or incentives that encourage desired behaviours. Examples include awards, recognition, promotions, and praise. They operate by associating positive outcomes with conformity, making it more appealing to individuals. For instance, a student who receives an award for academic excellence is more likely to engage in further academic pursuits, as it reinforces the positive association between academic achievement and social recognition. However, the effectiveness of positive sanctions depends on the subjective value of the reward. If the reward is not perceived as valuable or desirable, it may not be effective in motivating conformity.

Negative Sanctions and Their Effectiveness
Negative sanctions, on the other hand, are punishments or penalties for deviant behaviour. Examples include fines, imprisonment, expulsion, and social ostracism. They aim to deter individuals from engaging in undesirable behaviour through punishment and the fear of future punishment. For instance, the threat of imprisonment may discourage individuals from committing crimes. The effectiveness of negative sanctions is influenced by several factors, including the severity of the sanction, the certainty of punishment, and individual differences in motivations.

⭐Severity of the sanction: The harsher the punishment, the more likely it is to deter future deviance. However, excessively harsh punishments can be counterproductive, leading to resentment and rebellion.
⭐Certainty of punishment: Individuals are more likely to avoid deviant behavior if they believe that they will be caught and punished. Therefore, a consistent and predictable application of sanctions is crucial for their effectiveness.
⭐Individual differences and motivations: The effectiveness of negative sanctions also depends on individual differences in risk tolerance, moral beliefs, and social backgrounds. Individuals who are more risk-averse or have strong moral convictions may be more susceptible to deterrence than those who are more impulsive or have less social stake in conformity.

The Role of Informal Sanctions
Informal sanctions are unofficial forms of social control that operate through social pressure, norms, and expectations. They often occur in everyday interactions and are enforced by individuals, groups, or communities rather than formal institutions. Examples of informal sanctions include social disapproval, gossip, shaming, ostracism, and the withholding of approval. Informal sanctions play a significant role in shaping behavior by reinforcing social norms and expectations. They can be highly effective in discouraging behaviors that are considered unacceptable, as the fear of social rejection or disapproval can be a strong motivator. For instance, an individual who is ostracized by their peer group for engaging in bullying behavior may be more likely to modify their behaviour to avoid further social exclusion.

Limitations of Sanctions in Achieving Conformity
While sanctions can be effective in achieving conformity to some extent, they are not without limitations.

⭐Resistance and Rebellion: Sanctions can sometimes lead to resistance and rebellion, particularly if they are perceived as unjust or oppressive. This can be seen in cases of social movements against oppressive laws or policies, where individuals are willing to defy sanctions in pursuit of social change.
⭐Difficulty in addressing underlying social issues: Sanctions often focus on addressing the symptoms of deviance rather than the underlying social issues that contribute to it. For example, imprisoning individuals who commit crimes does not address the root causes of crime, such as poverty, inequality, or lack of opportunity.
⭐Unintended consequences: Sanctions can also have unintended consequences. For example, the labeling theory suggests that being labeled as deviant can reinforce deviant behavior, as individuals may internalize the label and act in accordance with it. This can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, where individuals are more likely to engage in deviant behavior because they are seen as deviant by others.

Sanctions can be effective in achieving conformity to some extent by encouraging desirable behaviors and discouraging deviant ones. However, their effectiveness is limited by various factors, such as the severity and certainty of punishments, individual differences, and the potential for resistance and unintended consequences. Ultimately, a more holistic approach to achieving conformity, which incorporates both formal and informal social control mechanisms alongside addressing underlying social issues, may be more effective than relying solely on sanctions.


Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press.
Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. The Free Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Criminology (9th ed.). Lippincott.

bottom of page