top of page

Discuss Willis' research on the creation of counter school cultures.


Roles and Functions

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Free Essay Outline

Introduce the concept of roles and functions and why it is important in sociology. Briefly mention Willis's research and its relevance to the topic.

Willis's Research on Counter-School Cultures
Give a brief overview of Willis's research, including the context, methodology, and focus.

Findings: The Creation of Counter-School Cultures
Explain the "lads" and their counter-school culture, including their values, beliefs, and attitudes towards education. Analyze why they create this culture.

The Role of Counter-School Cultures in Education
Discuss how counter-school cultures affect educational attainment and the social reproduction of class inequalities. Explain the link between roles and functions and Willis's findings.

Summarize the key points of the essay and reiterate the importance of Willis's research in understanding the role of counter-school cultures in education.

Free Essay 

Creating a "Lads' Culture": A Sociological Look at Counter-School Cultures in Willis' Research

Paul Willis' seminal 1977 study, "Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs," provides a fascinating look into the creation of counter-school cultures among working-class boys in the UK. Willis' research goes beyond simply observing resistance to school authority; it examines how these boys actively constructed a "lads' culture" that shaped their future trajectories, ultimately leading them into working-class jobs.

⭐⭐The "Lads" and Their Counter-School Culture:⭐⭐

Willis followed a group of twelve working-class boys throughout their final year of secondary school. He observed their everyday lives, interactions, and attitudes towards school, work, and societal expectations. He found that the boys, whom he termed "the lads," actively resisted the perceived "middle-class" values and aspirations promoted by the school system.

This resistance manifested in a distinct counter-school culture. They:

⭐Devalued academic work:⭐⭐ They saw academic achievement as "unmasculine," associating it with the "ear'oles" (the studious boys) who were perceived as effeminate and lacking "street smarts."
⭐Valued "having a laugh" and "mucking about":⭐⭐ They prioritized immediate gratification and enjoyment over long-term goals, often disrupting lessons and flouting school rules.
⭐Focused on "doing the bird":⭐⭐ This meant focusing on practical skills and manual labor, which they saw as more "real" and rewarding than abstract intellectual pursuits. This preference was influenced by their fathers’ working-class jobs and the limited opportunities they saw for themselves.

⭐⭐The "Lads' Culture" as a Strategic Choice:⭐⭐

It's vital to understand that the lads' resistance was not simply passive rebellion. Their counter-school culture was a conscious, albeit often unconscious, strategy to navigate the social and economic realities of their lives. They believed that academic success was irrelevant for their future prospects, while their "lads' culture" provided them with social acceptance, a sense of belonging, and a path towards working-class jobs that they perceived as "real" and fulfilling.

⭐⭐The "Lads' Culture" and Reproduction of Class:⭐⭐

Willis' research highlights how counter-school cultures play a significant role in the reproduction of social class. By actively rejecting the values and aspirations of the dominant class, the lads were essentially choosing to perpetuate their own social position. Their resistance to the school system, while seemingly individualistic, ultimately reinforced the existing social order.


Willis' research provides a valuable insight into the complexities of social class and education. It challenges the simplistic view of school as a neutral institution that provides equal opportunities for all. Instead, it demonstrates how counter-school cultures, shaped by social and economic factors, can actively resist and ultimately reproduce existing power structures.

Willis' work encourages us to move beyond blaming individuals for their choices and to understand how broader societal structures influence individual behavior. His research offers a powerful reminder that social change requires a critical examination of how power dynamics shape individual experiences and choices, even seemingly rebellious ones.

bottom of page