top of page

Assess the extent to which both Israel and Egypt benefited from the Yom Kippur War.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2022

Topic

International history, 1945–92

👑Complete Model Essay

Assess the extent to which both Israel and Egypt benefited from the Yom Kippur War.

To What Extent did Both Israel and Egypt Benefit from the Yom Kippur War?

The Yom Kippur War, a pivotal event in the Arab-Israeli conflict, had lasting consequences for both Israel and Egypt. While Israel emerged militarily victorious, Egypt secured significant political gains. This essay will argue that although Israel maintained its military superiority, Egypt ultimately benefited more from the war due to its successful reclaiming of lost territory and its enhanced international standing.

Israel's Military Victory and its Costs

Militarily, Israel undeniably triumphed. Despite the initial shock of the coordinated Egyptian-Syrian attack, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) rallied, repelling the offensive and pushing into Syrian territory. The war, however, came at a high price. The surprise attack exposed vulnerabilities in Israeli intelligence and military preparedness, leading to a national trauma. The Agranat Commission, established to investigate the war's failures, highlighted critical errors within the military and intelligence communities, ultimately resulting in the resignation of Prime Minister Golda Meir.<sup>1</sup> Furthermore, the war shattered the perception of Israeli invincibility, forcing a reassessment of its security doctrines.

Egypt's Political Triumph and Territorial Gains

For Egypt, the Yom Kippur War marked a turning point. President Anwar Sadat had cleverly leveraged the conflict to achieve several key objectives. Firstly, the initial Egyptian military successes, including the crossing of the Suez Canal, restored national pride and erased the humiliation of the 1967 Six-Day War. This victory resonated deeply within Egypt and across the Arab world, bolstering Sadat's standing and strengthening his hand in future negotiations.<sup>2</sup>

Secondly, the war paved the way for Egyptian-Israeli negotiations. By demonstrating Arab military strength and the willingness to challenge the status quo, Sadat forced Israel and the international community to take Egypt seriously as a negotiating partner. This led to the United States' active involvement in mediating a peaceful resolution, culminating in the Sinai Disengagement Agreements (1974/1975) and the eventual signing of the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty in 1979.<sup>3</sup> Through these agreements, Egypt secured the return of the Sinai Peninsula, a significant territorial gain, and the reopening of the Suez Canal, crucial for its economic recovery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Yom Kippur War yielded mixed outcomes for both Israel and Egypt. While Israel reaffirmed its military dominance, it suffered a psychological blow and faced internal criticism, forcing a reassessment of its strategic posture. Egypt, despite its military setbacks, achieved a resounding political victory. By regaining the Sinai Peninsula and achieving international recognition as a key player in the Middle East peace process, Egypt emerged from the war in a significantly stronger position than before. Therefore, while Israel secured a tactical military victory, Egypt ultimately reaped greater benefits from the Yom Kippur War, solidifying its position both regionally and globally.

References:
1. Rabinovich, I. (2004). The Yom Kippur War: The Epic Encounter That Transformed the Middle East. Schocken Books.
2. Heikal, M. (1983). Autumn of Fury: The Assassination of Sadat. Random House.
3. Shlaim, A. (2001). The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World. W. W. Norton & Company.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
This essay will assess the extent to which both Israel and Egypt benefited from the Yom Kippur War. It will argue that while Israel achieved significant military gains, Egypt ultimately achieved greater political and diplomatic benefits. This will be explored by examining the initial military success of Egypt and Syria, Israel's counteroffensive, and the subsequent peace negotiations.

Military Benefits
Israel
The war initially appeared to be a strategic victory for Egypt and Syria, with their surprise attack inflicting heavy losses on the Israeli Defense Forces. However, Israel quickly regrouped and counterattacked, successfully pushing back Egyptian forces and capturing territory. This military victory reinforced Israel's image as a strong military power and instilled a sense of confidence in its ability to defend itself.
Egypt
While Egypt's initial military success was short-lived, it served a crucial purpose in restoring Egyptian pride and demonstrating the capability of the Egyptian military. The war also forced Israel to the negotiating table, allowing Egypt to pursue its long-term goal of regaining the Sinai Peninsula.

Political and Diplomatic Benefits
Egypt
The Yom Kippur War was a turning point in Egyptian foreign policy. President Anwar Sadat's decision to launch the war, despite the potential risks, ultimately proved successful in achieving his political objectives. The war enabled Sadat to gain international recognition and leverage for peace negotiations with Israel. His subsequent visit to Israel in 1977 and the subsequent Camp David Accords, which resulted in the return of the Sinai Peninsula, are clear examples of Egypt's political gains.
Israel
While Israel's military victory was undeniable, the war also had significant political and diplomatic implications. The war highlighted the vulnerabilities of Israeli intelligence and led to widespread public criticism of the government. The war also led to the emergence of a new generation of Israeli leaders who were more open to peace negotiations.

Conclusion
In conclusion, while both Israel and Egypt benefited from the Yom Kippur War, Egypt ultimately achieved greater political and diplomatic gains. The war restored Egyptian pride, established Sadat as a global leader, and ultimately led to the return of the Sinai Peninsula. While Israel achieved significant military victories, the war also exposed vulnerabilities and contributed to political instability.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Assess the extent to which both Israel and Egypt benefited from the Yom Kippur War.

From the military point of view, the Yom Kippur War was a victory for the Israelis. The Egyptian and Syrian leaders secretly prepared for war, and a surprise attack was launched against Israel on 6 October 1973, on the Jewish holy day, Yom Kippur. Saudi Arabia provided Egypt with financial support. Egyptian forces achieved notable early successes, but then the Israelis managed to gain the initiative, counterattack, and cut off the Egyptian Third Army. Both the United States and the Soviet Union were involved in the war; the Soviet Union sent arms to Egypt and Syria, and the United States organized an airlift to Israel. When the Israelis crossed the Suez Canal, US forces were put on nuclear alert, but both superpowers wanted to avoid a confrontation; they demanded a ceasefire which the UN supported. Kissinger engaged in shuttle diplomacy between 1973 and 1975.

The Sinai I accord, 1974, allowed the Egyptians to retain control of the Suez Canal, freed the Third Army, and drew a ceasefire line on the east side of the canal, with a buffer zone between the two forces; the canal reopened in 1975. Sinai II was signed in September 1975 calling for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from two strategic passes in the Sinai and some surrounding territory. Saudi Arabia began selling oil to the United States again. The fact that the Arabs had succeeded in surprising the Israel Defence Forces and inflicting heavy losses in the early part of the war was a traumatic experience for Israel. The public called for an enquiry and a commission, chaired by the president of Israel’s Supreme Court, concluded that Israeli intelligence had sufficient warning of the impending attack but failed to interpret the information correctly. The public blamed the Prime Minister, Golda Meir, and Defence Minister, Moshe Dayan. It was later revealed that the head of IDF intelligence made a critical error. Public outrage ultimately led Meir to resign.

However, it could be argued that the political victory belonged to Egypt. The Arab soldiers demonstrated that they could act together both in military planning and in the use of the oil weapon. Military involvement helped to restore Egyptian pride. Sadat aimed to move from the humiliation of 1967 to being in a strong position to negotiate peace. Israel had gained Sinai and Gaza from Egypt, the Golan Heights from Syria, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank from Jordan in 1967. Sadat also wanted to resolve the country’s economic problems. From 1968–1979, Israel and Egypt waged what became a war of attrition over the Suez Canal; reopening the canal would help to restore Egypt’s economy. He was determined to regain Sinai, promising his people a settlement with Israel. He was prepared to recognize the state of Israel to regain this land, but Israel refused to negotiate. He needed US involvement to force Israel into peace negotiations, but a weak Egypt would not be taken seriously. The war achieved his goals of restoring Egyptian pride. Sadat emerged from the war as a world leader and had improved Egypt’s standing in the world. He could now seek peace. In November 1977, he flew to Israel and informed the parliament that he was prepared to live in peace and security, but he also wanted a solution for the Palestinians. In the following month, Menachem Begin went to Egypt; peace talks began but slowed down. In 1978 President Carter invited the two leaders to Camp David. It was agreed that Israeli forces were to be withdrawn from Sinai and that Egypt was to regain the whole of Sinai within three years. Israel was to have free shipping through the Suez Canal and the Straits of Tiran. In March 1979, the Treaty of Washington was signed, confirming the agreements reached at Camp David. The Palestinian problem still remained.

bottom of page