Which of the following created greater change in relations between the USSR and the West? i. Détente in the 1970s ii. The ‘new Cold War’ of 1979-1985 Explain your answer with reference to both (i) and (ii).
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2021
Topic
The Cold War in Europe 1941-1995
👑Complete Model Essay
Which of the following created greater change in relations between the USSR and the West? i. Détente in the 1970s ii. The ‘new Cold War’ of 1979-1985 Explain your answer with reference to both (i) and (ii).
Which of the following created greater change in relations between the USSR and the West? i. Détente in the 1970s ii. The ‘new Cold War’ of 1979-1985
The period of détente in the 1970s and the subsequent ‘new Cold War’ of 1979-1985 represent two distinct phases in the relationship between the USSR and the West. Both periods witnessed significant shifts in the political landscape, but it was the ‘new Cold War’ that ultimately had a greater impact on relations between the superpowers. While détente brought about a period of relative calm and cooperation, the ‘new Cold War’ re-ignited tensions and ultimately paved the way for the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union.
Détente: A Period of Relative Calm
Détente, meaning "relaxation" in French, emerged as a strategic shift in the late 1960s and early 1970s, characterized by a willingness to engage in dialogue and negotiation between the USSR and the West. This period saw a number of significant developments, including:
⭐Arms limitation agreements: The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) I and II treaties signed in 1972 and 1979 respectively aimed to limit the growth of nuclear arsenals, marking a significant step towards reducing the risk of nuclear war. <br>
⭐Improved communication and relations between leaders: Détente facilitated regular communication between US President Richard Nixon and Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev, leading to a series of summits and diplomatic exchanges. This helped build trust and understanding between the two leaders, paving the way for future cooperation. <br>
⭐Ostpolitik: The policy of West German Chancellor Willy Brandt aimed at improving relations with Eastern Europe, including East Germany. This led to the signing of treaties acknowledging the post-war borders and the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two German states, contributing to a lessening of tensions in Europe.
However, détente's impact was ultimately limited. Despite the agreements and improved communication, underlying ideological differences remained, and both superpowers continued to pursue their own interests on the global stage. Moreover, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 marked a turning point, ending the era of détente and ushering in a new phase of Cold War tensions.
The ‘New Cold War’: Resurgence of Tensions
The ‘new Cold War’ of 1979-1985 witnessed a resurgence of tensions between the USSR and the West. Key factors contributing to this shift included:
⭐Renewal of tensions: The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan ignited strong condemnation from the West, leading to a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics and a renewed escalation of the arms race. <br>
⭐The escalation of the nuclear threat: The development of new and more sophisticated nuclear weapons by both superpowers heightened the risk of a catastrophic nuclear war. The deployment of intermediate-range nuclear missiles by the Soviet Union in Europe further fueled Cold War tensions. <br>
⭐Renewed commitment to ‘win’ the Cold War: The election of Ronald Reagan as US President in 1980 marked a significant shift in American policy. Reagan adopted a hard-line stance against the Soviet Union, rejecting peaceful coexistence and vowing to "win" the Cold War. This aggressive rhetoric further strained relations between the superpowers.
The ‘new Cold War’ brought about significant changes in the global landscape. The arms race escalated, leading to increasing military spending by both sides. Proxy wars intensified in regions like Central America and Southeast Asia, increasing global instability. Furthermore, the “new Cold War” sowed seeds of mistrust and animosity that ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Conclusion: A Greater Impact
While détente brought about a period of relative calm and cooperation, the ‘new Cold War’ had a greater impact on relations between the USSR and the West. The renewed tensions, the escalation of the nuclear threat, and the ideological clash between the superpowers ultimately led to the collapse of the Soviet Union, marking the end of the Cold War. The ‘new Cold War’ not only reversed the gains achieved during détente but also fundamentally reshaped the global political order.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Essay Outline: Détente vs. the "New Cold War"
Introduction:
Briefly define both Détente and the "New Cold War." State your argument: which period caused a greater shift in USSR-West relations? Briefly preview your main points.
Body Paragraph 1: Détente and its Impact
Point: Détente brought tangible changes to USSR-West relations, signaling a move away from confrontation.
Evidence:
⭐SALT I and SALT II: Discuss the aims and limitations of these treaties. Did they represent a genuine reduction in tension?
⭐Improved Communication: Examples of summits (e.g., Nixon-Brezhnev) and their outcomes. Did they foster trust or were they primarily symbolic?
⭐Ostpolitik: Explain its significance. How did it impact the lives of everyday Germans and the broader East-West dynamic?
Body Paragraph 2: The Limitations of Détente
Point: Despite progress, Détente had inherent weaknesses and failed to address core ideological differences.
Evidence:
⭐Continued Arms Race: Did SALT truly limit arms development, or did it simply shift the focus (e.g., to qualitative improvements)?
⭐Proxy Conflicts: Discuss examples like the Soviet-Afghan War. How did these undermine the spirit of détente?
⭐Underlying Mistrust: Were both sides truly committed to détente, or was it a strategic maneuver? Consider motivations and internal pressures.
Body Paragraph 3: The "New Cold War" and its Escalatory Nature
Point: The "New Cold War" marked a return to confrontation and heightened the stakes of the rivalry.
Evidence:
⭐Reagan's Hard Line: Explain his policies (e.g., SDI) and rhetoric. How did they depart from the détente era?
⭐Increased Military Spending: Discuss both US and Soviet military buildups. What impact did this have on global stability and perceptions?
⭐Nuclear Fears: How did events like Able Archer 83 bring the world closer to potential conflict?
Body Paragraph 4: The Complexity of Change
Point: While the "New Cold War" was a stark departure from détente, it also set the stage for the eventual end of the Cold War.
Evidence:
⭐Pressure on the USSR: How did US policies contribute to Soviet economic strain? Link to Gorbachev's reforms.
⭐Re-evaluation of Détente: Did the failure of the "New Cold War" to achieve its objectives lead to a reassessment of peaceful coexistence?
Conclusion:
Restate your argument about which period caused greater change. Do not introduce new information but offer a nuanced reflection on the complexities of the changes. Briefly mention the lasting impact on international relations.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Dealing with Détente
In dealing with détente, answers might consider agreements over arms limitation and reduction, easing the tension over nuclear weapons. Answers might consider improved communication and relations between leaders. Answers might consider the significance of Ostpolitik in easing relations between East and West Germany.
Dealing with the New Cold War
In dealing with the new Cold War, answers might consider the renewal of tensions. Answers might consider the escalation of the nuclear threat. Answers might consider the renewed commitment of the United States to ‘win’ the Cold War and not accept peaceful coexistence.