top of page

‘The Lancastrians were in a stronger position than the Yorkists after the Second Battle of St Albans in February 1461.’ Assess the validity of this view.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2020

Topic

Power of the Monarchy

👑Complete Model Essay

‘The Lancastrians were in a stronger position than the Yorkists after the Second Battle of St Albans in February 1461.’ Assess the validity of this view.

The Lancastrian Position After the Second Battle of St Albans

The assertion that the Lancastrians held a stronger position than the Yorkists following the Second Battle of St Albans in February 1461 merits careful examination. While the Lancastrian victory at St Albans might suggest a position of strength, a closer analysis of the broader political and military landscape reveals a more nuanced reality.

Arguments Supporting Lancastrian Strength

On the surface, the Lancastrians appeared to have gained considerable ground with their victory at St Albans. They successfully recaptured King Henry VI, a significant symbolic and strategic advantage. The Yorkist King-maker, Richard Neville, Earl of Salisbury, was forced to flee, leaving Henry VI to be reunited with his queen, Margaret of Anjou. The recapture of the King could be seen to bolster Lancastrian legitimacy and rally support to their cause.

Furthermore, the Lancastrians under Margaret of Anjou and the Duke of Somerset achieved a comfortable victory over Warwick's forces. The Yorkist army was routed, suffering significant losses. This victory, coupled with the Lancastrians' larger army, seemingly placed them in a commanding military position.

The Lancastrians, particularly under the determined leadership of Margaret of Anjou, were able to rally a convincing level of support in certain parts of the country. This was particularly true in the north of England, where the Percy family remained staunch Lancastrian loyalists.

Arguments Challenging Lancastrian Strength

Despite these apparent advantages, the Lancastrian position was undermined by significant weaknesses. Henry VI, despite being rescued, still suffered from a reputation for weakness and indecision. His mental fragility and inability to provide strong leadership continued to plague the Lancastrian cause.

Crucially, the political landscape had been drastically altered just a few months prior by Henry VI's signing of the Act of Accord in October 1460. This act, forced upon Henry by the victorious Yorkists after the Battle of Northampton, disinherited his own son and named Richard of York as his heir. Though Henry had been coerced, the Act of Accord seriously damaged the legitimacy of the Lancastrian claim to the throne.

While the Lancastrians celebrated at St Albans, Edward, Duke of York, Richard's son, had secured a crucial victory at the Battle of Mortimer’s Cross in early February 1461. This victory not only demonstrated Edward's growing military strength but also prevented the joining of Yorkist forces in the Welsh Marches with those of Warwick.

Moreover, the Yorkist cause was significantly bolstered by their ability to gain the support of London. The city, a crucial economic and political center, held considerable sway. London's allegiance to the Yorkists, driven by fear of Lancastrian reprisals and the desire for stability, was a severe blow to the Lancastrian position.

Adding to the Lancastrians' woes were the losses of key nobles who had either been killed in battle or had switched allegiance to the Yorkist side. The defection of prominent nobles like the Earl of Salisbury, disillusioned with the perceived excesses of the Lancastrian regime, further weakened their standing.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Lancastrians might have appeared to be in a strong position after the Second Battle of St Albans, a closer examination reveals a much more precarious reality. The recapture of Henry VI and their military victory were overshadowed by the enduring weaknesses of Henry's leadership, the political consequences of the Act of Accord, and the rising power of Edward of York. Further, the Yorkists' capture of London and the ongoing erosion of support for the Lancastrians among the nobility created a strategic disadvantage that would ultimately contribute to their downfall. The Second Battle of St Albans, therefore, should be viewed not as a turning point in favor of the Lancastrians, but rather as a brief respite in the midst of a larger conflict that was tilting inexorably towards the Yorkist cause. The subsequent Battle of Towton, just a few weeks later, would solidify Edward's claim to the throne and usher in a new chapter in the Wars of the Roses.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

The Lancastrians were in a stronger position than the Yorkists after the Second Battle of St Albans in February 1461. Assess the validity of this view.

This essay will assess the validity of the view that the Lancastrians were in a stronger position than the Yorkists after the Second Battle of St Albans in February 1461. It will argue that although the Lancastrians achieved a tactical victory, the Yorkists were ultimately in a stronger position due to their political and military advantages.

Arguments supporting the view

Argument 1: The Lancastrians had recaptured Henry VI from the Yorkists.
Argument 2: The Lancastrians achieved a comfortable victory over Warwick's forces.
Argument 3: The Lancastrian army was still larger.
Argument 4: The Lancastrians were able to rally a convincing level of support.

Arguments challenging the view

Argument 1: Henry VI still had a reputation for weakness.
Argument 2: Henry VI had signed the Act of Accord, which alienated many of his supporters.
Argument 3: Edward had achieved his first victory at the Battle of Mortimer’s Cross, boosting Yorkist morale.
Argument 4: The Yorkists were able to gain the support of London, which was a vital source of revenue.
Argument 5: The Lancastrians had lost key nobles, such as the Duke of Somerset, who were essential for their leadership.

Conclusion

The essay will conclude that while the Lancastrians were in a more advantageous position immediately after the Second Battle of St. Albans, the Yorkists' political and military advantages ultimately proved decisive. The Yorkists were able to exploit their strengths, quickly solidifying their control over England and ultimately securing the crown for Edward IV.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Arguments supporting the view

The Lancastrians had recaptured Henry VI from the Yorkists
The Lancastrians achieved a comfortable victory over Warwick's forces
The Lancastrian army was still larger
The Lancastrians were able to rally a convincing level of support

Arguments challenging the view

Henry VI still had a reputation for weakness
Henry VI had signed the Act of Accord
Edward had achieved his first victory at the Battle of Mortimer’s Cross
The Yorkists were able to gain the support of London
The Lancastrians had lost key nobles

bottom of page