top of page

‘The main reason why the Nazi regime maintained its control of Germany in the period 1933–39 was its use of terror.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2022

Topic

European history in the interwar years, 1919–41

👑Complete Model Essay

‘The main reason why the Nazi regime maintained its control of Germany in the period 1933–39 was its use of terror.

The Use of Terror in Maintaining Nazi Control of Germany, 1933–39

**Introduction:**
The Nazi regime's grip on Germany between 1933 and 1939 is a complex subject. While the use of terror is often cited as a primary reason for their sustained control, this essay will explore whether it was the sole or most significant factor. Analyzing the interplay between terror and other factors like propaganda, economic policies, and the cult of personality will provide a nuanced understanding of the regime's complex web of control.

**Body:**

**The Role of Terror:**
There is no doubt that terror was a key element in the Nazi regime's strategy. It was instrumental in eliminating opposition and silencing dissent. The establishment of the Gestapo, the SS, and the concentration camps created a pervasive climate of fear. The Night of the Long Knives in 1934, which saw the elimination of potential rivals within the Nazi Party, demonstrated the ruthlessness with which the regime dealt with perceived threats. [1] This brutal act solidified Hitler's power and established the SS as a formidable force.

Terror was not just directed towards political opponents. The regime targeted individuals and groups deemed 'undesirable,' such as Jews, Roma, homosexuals, and the disabled. The systematic persecution and ultimately the Holocaust exemplified the chilling efficacy of terror in achieving the regime's ideological goals. [2]

**Beyond Terror: Other Factors in Nazi Control:**

While terror played a crucial role, it cannot be considered the sole reason for the regime's success. Several other factors contributed to its longevity.

**1. Propaganda and the Cult of Personality:**
The Nazi regime employed sophisticated propaganda techniques to shape public opinion and foster loyalty towards Hitler. The Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, led by Joseph Goebbels, controlled all forms of media. [3] They presented a distorted image of the regime's achievements, highlighting economic progress and portraying Hitler as a charismatic and powerful leader. This propaganda, coupled with the cult of personality surrounding Hitler, helped to create a sense of national unity and support for the regime.

**2. Economic Policies:**
The Nazi government implemented a series of economic policies designed to stimulate the economy and create jobs. The "Four-Year Plan," launched in 1936, aimed to make Germany self-sufficient in raw materials and prepare for war. [4] These policies initially enjoyed some success, contributing to a sense of economic stability and prosperity.

**3. Compliance and Acceptance:**

Many Germans, especially those who had suffered during the economic crisis of the 1920s, welcomed the stability and order offered by the Nazi regime. The regime's focus on traditional values, national pride, and anti-Semitism resonated with a significant portion of the population. This acceptance, even if not always enthusiastic, played a crucial role in easing the implementation of Nazi policies.

**Conclusion:**

The Nazi regime's grip on power between 1933-1939 cannot be attributed solely to terror. While terror was a potent tool, it was part of a wider system of control that included propaganda, economic policies, and the exploitation of existing anxieties and desires within German society. The regime's success in maintaining control was a complex interplay of these factors, highlighting how different forms of power can be used to secure and maintain dominance.

**Sources:**

[1] Shirer, W. L. (1960). *The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich*. New York: Simon and Schuster.

[2] Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). *Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust*. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

[3] Goebbels, J. (1946). *The Goebbels Diaries*. New York: Doubleday.

[4] Craig, G. A. (1968). *Germany, 1866-1945*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
Briefly outline the use of terror by the Nazi regime (1933-1939).
State the essay's argument: While terror was significant, it was not the sole factor in maintaining Nazi control. Other elements, including propaganda and economic success, played crucial roles.

Terror as a Tool of Control
Discuss the systematic dismantling of opposition:

⭐Elimination of political rivals (e.g., Communists, Social Democrats).
⭐Suppression of trade unions and other organizations.
⭐The Night of the Long Knives and the purging of the SA.

Explain the roles of the Gestapo and concentration camps in creating an atmosphere of fear and silencing dissent.
Provide specific examples of how fear and intimidation were used to enforce compliance.

Challenges to the Primacy of Terror
Present evidence that challenges the idea of all-encompassing terror:

⭐Limited Gestapo resources and reliance on informants.
⭐Focus on specific "out-groups" rather than widespread repression.
⭐Examples of public compliance rather than fervent support.


The Role of Propaganda and the Hitler Myth
Analyze the role of propaganda in creating a cult of personality around Hitler and promoting Nazi ideology.
Discuss the impact of economic policies and social programs on public opinion.
Explain how the regime manipulated public perception to deflect criticism and maintain its grip on power.

Conclusion
Reiterate the argument: Terror was a crucial element of Nazi control, but it was not the only factor.
Summarize the key supporting points: The essay has demonstrated how factors such as propaganda, economic policies, and the manipulation of public opinion were essential in maintaining Nazi control.
Offer a final thought on the complex interplay of factors that allowed the Nazi regime to retain power.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

The Use of Terror in Maintaining Nazi Control of Germany, 1933–39

Introduction:
The main reason why the Nazi regime maintained its control of Germany in the period 1933–39 was its use of terror. This essay will discuss this view, analyzing how terror was utilized as a tool for consolidating power and suppressing dissent.

Body:
There is a case for terror being at the heart of Nazi control. Terror eliminated all other possible power bases - the Communists, Trade Unions, other parties, and even the nationalists. It ended the authority of the states and neutralized potential threats within the movement, exemplified by the Night of the Long Knives. Dissenting voices faced an efficient Gestapo and the threat of Concentration Camps, undermining court verdicts that went against the regime's wishes.

Violence and repression characterized the consolidation of power in 1933–34, with Himmler and Heydrich overseeing highly effective control methods. The feared SS organization operated as a virtual state within a state, instilling widespread fear. Small acts of dissent or lack of commitment to the regime were met with harsh punishment.

However, the primacy of terror as a means of control has been questioned. Local studies found Gestapo numbers were limited, relying on informants and public participation in suppressing 'anti-social behavior'. Support for the police and SS was relatively high, and repression disproportionately targeted 'out groups' like socialists and Jews rather than the general population, which largely complied with the regime to avoid political involvement.

The Hitler myth played a crucial role in fostering loyalty, deflecting criticism away from the Führer and emphasizing regime successes. Propaganda highlighted progress in various areas, overshadowing the threats posed by the regime. While terror could enforce compliance, it alone could not cultivate genuine popularity.

As pressures intensified due to war preparations and increased Nazification, dissent remained limited, and belief in Hitler stayed strong. Despite escalating repression, positive sentiments towards the Führer persisted, maintaining high levels of loyalty among the German populace.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, while terror was a significant tool in maintaining Nazi control in Germany from 1933–39, other factors such as propaganda, economic policies, and the Hitler myth also played crucial roles in securing compliance and loyalty. The regime's ability to balance coercion with propaganda contributed to its longevity, illustrating a complex web of control mechanisms at play during this period.

bottom of page