The threat of nuclear war declined significantly in the years 1963 to 1968. Assess the validity of this view.
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2021
Topic
The Cold War, c1945-1991
👑Complete Model Essay
The threat of nuclear war declined significantly in the years 1963 to 1968. Assess the validity of this view.
The Threat of Nuclear War: 1963-1968
The assertion that the threat of nuclear war declined significantly between 1963 and 1968 holds considerable weight. This period witnessed a series of crucial agreements and initiatives that aimed to mitigate the risk of nuclear confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union. While underlying tensions and the potential for catastrophic conflict remained, the steps taken during these years marked a tangible shift towards nuclear deterrence and arms control.
The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 served as a stark wake-up call for both superpowers. The chilling realization that the world had teetered on the brink of nuclear annihilation spurred a new era of cautious diplomacy. The National Security Council's Net Evaluation Subcommittee's 1963 report, with its grim projection of 93 million casualties in a nuclear exchange, further underscored the catastrophic consequences of such a conflict. This shared understanding of "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) became a cornerstone of deterrence theory, compelling both sides to seek ways to manage the nuclear standoff.
The establishment of the Washington-Moscow hotline in June 1963 was a direct response to the communication breakdowns that exacerbated the Cuban Missile Crisis. This direct line of communication, while largely symbolic, provided a crucial channel for rapid dialogue between leaders during moments of crisis. It aimed to prevent misunderstandings and miscalculations from escalating into unintended nuclear exchanges.
The Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963 marked the first concrete step towards nuclear arms control. By banning atmospheric, underwater, and outer space nuclear tests, the treaty aimed to limit the environmental and health hazards of radioactive fallout. Moreover, it served as a significant symbolic act, demonstrating a willingness to curb the development of new and more destructive nuclear weapons. While the treaty did not eliminate the threat of nuclear war, it represented a crucial first step towards international cooperation on nuclear issues.
The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968 further solidified the commitment to containing the spread of nuclear weapons. It sought to prevent the emergence of new nuclear states by prohibiting the transfer of nuclear weapons technology from nuclear-weapon states to non-nuclear-weapon states. The NPT, while not universally adhered to, has played a significant role in limiting the number of nuclear-armed states and preventing regional nuclear arms races.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the threat of nuclear war did not vanish entirely during this period. The Vietnam War, a proxy conflict between the superpowers, continued to escalate. Both sides continued to develop and deploy new nuclear weapons systems, engaging in a dangerous arms race. The underlying ideological conflict and mistrust between the US and USSR persisted, casting a long shadow over these positive developments.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the complete elimination of the nuclear threat remained elusive, the period from 1963 to 1968 witnessed a tangible reduction in the immediacy and likelihood of nuclear war. The shared experience of the Cuban Missile Crisis, coupled with the sobering projections of potential casualties, fostered a climate of cautious diplomacy. The hotline, the Limited Test Ban Treaty, and the Non-Proliferation Treaty, while imperfect, represented concrete steps toward managing the nuclear standoff and preventing its escalation. It is crucial to recognize both the progress made during these crucial years and the persistent dangers that continued to underscore the precariousness of the nuclear age.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
The Threat of Nuclear War Declined Significantly in the Years 1963 to 1968: An Assessment
This essay will assess the validity of the claim that the threat of nuclear war declined significantly in the years 1963 to 1968. It will argue that while important steps were taken to reduce the risk of nuclear conflict, the threat remained substantial during this period.
Arguments in favour of a significant decline:
Agreement on Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD): As recognized by the National Security Council’s Net Evaluation Subcommittee in 1963, both the USA and USSR understood the devastating consequences of nuclear war. This recognition, combined with the leadership of Kennedy and Khrushchev, fostered a greater emphasis on avoiding nuclear conflict.
The Washington-Moscow Hotline: This communication channel established in 1963 provided a crucial platform for rapid and secure communication between the superpowers, mitigating the risk of miscalculation or escalation, as seen during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
The Test Ban Treaty (1963): This treaty prohibited above-ground nuclear testing, marking a significant step towards nuclear limitations and reducing the radioactive fallout that posed a global threat.
The Non-Proliferation Treaty (1968): This treaty aimed to restrict the spread of nuclear technology to non-nuclear states, effectively limiting the expansion of nuclear arsenals beyond the major powers.
Arguments against a significant decline:
Continued Arms Race: Despite the Test Ban Treaty, both superpowers continued to develop and stockpile nuclear weapons. The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) did not begin until 1969, highlighting the continued arms race during this period.
Regional Conflicts: The Vietnam War, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and other regional tensions remained significant sources of potential escalation that could have drawn the superpowers into nuclear conflict.
The China Factor: China's development of nuclear weapons in 1964 introduced a new player into the nuclear equation, adding complexity and uncertainty to the international security environment.
The Cuban Missile Crisis Legacy: While the hotline and the Test Ban Treaty were important, the crisis itself demonstrated the fragility of the situation and the ever-present danger of miscalculation.
Conclusion:
While the years 1963 to 1968 saw important steps towards reducing the threat of nuclear war, it is not accurate to claim that the threat declined significantly. The arms race continued, regional conflicts persisted, and the emergence of China as a nuclear power added new challenges. While the risk of a direct nuclear conflict between the USA and USSR may have decreased, the threat remained substantial, and the potential for nuclear war remained a major concern.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
The Cold War and Nuclear Deterrent
The National Security Council’s Net Evaluation Subcommittee in 1963 agreed that neither the USA or the USSR could emerge from a nuclear conflict without severe damage and high casualties, estimated at a combined 93 million casualties. Both Khrushchev and Kennedy, therefore, acknowledged that the avoidance of nuclear war was crucial – through reducing the spread of nuclear technology and limiting the number of weapons.
The Washington-Moscow hotline, introduced in June 1963, allowed the USA and USSR to communicate quickly and securely to avoid the risk of a crisis similar to Cuba escalating into nuclear devastation. This was an important symbolic act that was necessary due to the slow communication during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Early Steps Towards Nuclear Disarmament
The Test Ban Treaty of 1963 prohibited above-ground, underwater and outer space nuclear testing which was the first collective agreement to establish nuclear limitations. This agreement safeguarded future development of nuclear weapons and ensured that most superpowers were committed to reducing the impact of nuclear testing.
The Non-Proliferation Treaty of July 1968 aimed to reduce the spread of nuclear technology by essentially prohibiting non-nuclear states from forming alliances with nuclear technologically advanced states and thereby establishing their own nuclear arsenals. It was effective in limiting the development of nuclear technology beyond the main superpowers such as the USA, USSR and China.