‘Up to 1917 the USA consistently avoided involvement in the affairs of European nations.
Level
AS LEVEL
Year Examined
2022
Topic
Empire and the emergence of world powers, 1870–1919
👑Complete Model Essay
‘Up to 1917 the USA consistently avoided involvement in the affairs of European nations.
How Far Did the USA Avoid Involvement in European Affairs Up to 1917?
The assertion that the USA consistently avoided involvement in European affairs up to 1917 holds some truth, but ultimately oversimplifies a complex historical narrative. While a policy of isolationism characterized much of early American foreign policy, the growing influence of the United States on the world stage, coupled with evolving global dynamics, inevitably led to increased entanglement in European matters.
Arguments for Isolationism
From its inception, the United States, under the guidance of figures like George Washington, adopted a wary approach to European entanglements. This caution was enshrined in the Monroe Doctrine (1823), which, while primarily aimed at limiting European influence in the Americas, underscored a desire to remain apart from European power struggles.
This isolationist sentiment was further reinforced by the nation's diverse population, composed largely of immigrants seeking refuge from European political and economic turmoil. The memory of such hardships fueled a reluctance to be drawn into conflicts that seemed distant and irrelevant to their newfound lives in the New World. The American focus on westward expansion and internal development during the 19th century further supported this inward-looking perspective.
The outbreak of World War I in 1914 initially seemed to confirm the United States' commitment to neutrality. President Woodrow Wilson, reflecting the prevailing public opinion, declared American neutrality, emphasizing the need to remain uninvolved in a distant European conflict. His successful 1916 re-election campaign, run on the slogan "He kept us out of war," seemingly validated the nation's desire for continued isolation.
Challenges to Isolationism
However, this narrative of consistent isolationism overlooks the gradual shift in American foreign policy, particularly during the Progressive Era (1890s-1920s). Presidents like William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft, driven by a belief in the nation's growing global responsibility and economic interests, pursued a more active role on the world stage.
The Spanish-American War of 1898, which resulted in the U.S. acquiring territories like the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Guam, marked a turning point. This foray into overseas expansion signaled a growing awareness of the nation's potential as a global power and a willingness to intervene in international affairs, albeit primarily within its perceived sphere of influence.
The presidencies of Roosevelt and Taft further exemplified this shift. Roosevelt's mediation in the Russo-Japanese War, culminating in the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905), and his deployment of the Great White Fleet (1907-1909) on a global tour, demonstrated America's increasing diplomatic and naval assertiveness. Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, while focused on economic expansion, also entangled the United States in the financial affairs of countries like Nicaragua and China, demonstrating a willingness to protect American interests abroad.
Furthermore, the outbreak of World War I presented challenges to American neutrality that proved difficult to ignore. While officially neutral, the United States' economic ties to the Allied powers, particularly through loans and the sale of war materials, increasingly tilted the balance in favor of Great Britain and France. This economic entanglement, coupled with the increasing public outrage over Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare, which culminated in the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915, gradually eroded support for isolationism.
The discovery of the Zimmermann Telegram in 1917, revealing Germany's attempt to entice Mexico into an alliance against the United States, proved to be the final straw. It confirmed American fears of German aggression and tipped public opinion decisively in favor of war.
Conclusion
While the claim that the United States consistently avoided involvement in European affairs up to 1917 has some merit, it presents an incomplete picture. While a policy of isolationism characterized much of early American history, the late 19th and early 20th centuries witnessed a gradual shift towards a more assertive foreign policy. Driven by economic interests, a growing sense of global responsibility, and the escalating tensions in Europe, the United States found itself increasingly drawn into international affairs. The outbreak of World War I, while initially met with a desire for neutrality, ultimately exposed the limits of American isolationism, culminating in the nation's entry into the conflict in 1917. The period leading up to American involvement in the war reveals a complex interplay of isolationist tendencies and a growing awareness of the nation's burgeoning global power and responsibilities.
**Sources**
Kennedy, D. M. (1989). *The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000*. Vintage Books.
LaFeber, W. (2011). *A People's History of American Empire*. Pantheon Books.
Smith, D. M. (2014). *The American Century: A History of the United States Since 1900*. Yale University Press.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Outline
This essay will explore the extent to which the USA consistently avoided involvement in European affairs up to 1917, analyzing both supporting and challenging arguments.
Supporting Arguments
This section will focus on evidence suggesting the USA maintained a policy of isolationism.
The Monroe Doctrine
Explain the Monroe Doctrine's assertion of American dominance in the Western Hemisphere and its implications for European involvement.
Post-Spanish-American War Focus
Analyze how the USA, despite acquiring territories from Spain, prioritized domestic development and Pacific expansion, seemingly avoiding European entanglements.
Anti-Interventionist Sentiment
Discuss the prevalent American sentiment against involvement in European affairs, rooted in immigration and a desire for peace.
Initial Neutrality in World War I
Highlight President Wilson's initial stance of neutrality and his successful 1916 re-election campaign based on this policy.
Challenging Arguments
This section will present evidence indicating the USA's increasing engagement with European affairs.
Progressive Era Engagement
Discuss the active foreign policy pursued by Progressive presidents like McKinley and Roosevelt, including the Treaty of Portsmouth and the Great White Fleet.
Growing International Interests
Analyze how the USA intervened in situations where its expanding global interests were threatened, such as the Boxer Rebellion.
Financial Ties with European Powers
Examine the significant loans provided by American banks to Britain and France, financing the war effort and demonstrating economic interconnectedness.
Shifting Public Opinion
Explain how German submarine warfare and the Zimmermann Telegram turned American sentiment against Germany, culminating in Wilson's eventual declaration of war.
Conclusion
This section will provide a balanced judgment on the extent to which the USA consistently avoided involvement in European affairs up to 1917, acknowledging the validity of both supporting and challenging arguments. Emphasize the evolving nature of American foreign policy and the complexities of its relationship with Europe during this period.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Up to 1917, the USA consistently avoided involvement in the affairs of European nations.
How far do you agree with this statement?
This is a question with clear alternatives from which a balanced judgment can be made.
In support of the claim:
The US had, from the time of the Monroe Doctrine, isolated itself from European affairs. Even following the acquisition of the remnants of the Spanish Empire, the US focused on developing its Pacific, avoiding involvement in European affairs. Given that many of its citizens came from different European countries and many had migrated to avoid persecution and escape poverty, there was little appetite amongst many Americans for involvement with the other world powers. When the First World War began, the US immediately asserted its neutrality, and President Wilson was strongly opposed to involvement. Wilson fought the 1916 election campaign on a platform of continuing neutrality and won a second term.
Challenging the claim:
The Progressive presidents from McKinley onwards pursued a more active overseas policy and engaged in international negotiations like the Treaty of Portsmouth (Russo-Japanese War). Roosevelt built up a modern navy and sent it on an international tour to enhance US prestige in 1907–09 (the Great White Fleet). The US increasingly got involved in situations when its growing international interests were threatened (e.g. Boxer Rising). US banks made large loans to Britain and France that were used to buy US manufactured equipment in the early years of the war. The actions of German submarines turned popular opinion increasingly against Germany, with Wilson only narrowly winning the 1916 election; the Zimmermann Telegram was just the last straw.
Accept any other valid responses.