To what extent did British policy towards the USSR change during the 1930s?
Level
AS LEVEL
Year Examined
2022
Topic
China and Japan, 1912–45
👑Complete Model Essay
To what extent did British policy towards the USSR change during the 1930s?
To What Extent Did British Policy Towards the USSR Change During the 1930s?
British policy towards the USSR during the 1930s was characterized by a complex interplay of ideological suspicion, geopolitical considerations, and pragmatic adjustments. While it can be argued that the fundamental distrust of Soviet communism remained a consistent element throughout the decade, there were notable shifts and attempts at rapprochement, particularly in response to the growing threat of Nazi Germany. This essay will analyze the extent to which British policy towards the USSR underwent transformation during this pivotal period.
The legacy of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 cast a long shadow over Anglo-Soviet relations. Conservative governments, which dominated British politics throughout the 1930s, harbored deep ideological antipathy towards communism. The Soviet Union, with its collectivized economy and one-party state, was viewed as a fundamental challenge to the existing world order. This distrust was exacerbated by Soviet support for international communist movements, which were perceived as a threat to British imperial interests. The Comintern (Communist International), established in 1919, actively sought to promote global revolution, further fueling British anxieties.
The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) served as a litmus test for Anglo-Soviet relations. Despite officially adhering to the Non-Intervention Agreement, the Soviet Union provided material support to the Republican government, which was fighting against a fascist uprising led by General Francisco Franco. Britain, on the other hand, remained largely neutral, fearing that intervention would escalate the conflict into a wider European war. The Soviet Union's actions in Spain reinforced British perceptions of Moscow as an unreliable and ideologically driven actor.
The Munich Conference of 1938 marked a low point in Anglo-Soviet relations. Despite having a defense pact with both France and Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union was excluded from the negotiations, which ultimately resulted in the cession of the Sudetenland to Nazi Germany. This exclusion highlighted the deep mistrust between the West and the Soviet Union, as well as the British government's willingness to appease Hitler in the hope of avoiding another devastating war.
However, it would be an oversimplification to argue that British policy towards the USSR remained static throughout the 1930s. There were periods of tentative cooperation and even attempts at forging a united front against Nazi aggression. In 1930, a Labour government under Ramsay MacDonald restored diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union and renewed trade agreements. This brief period of rapprochement, however, was driven more by economic pragmatism than any fundamental shift in ideological outlook.
In 1934, the Soviet Union was admitted to the League of Nations, with no objections from Britain. This move was seen as a way to integrate the Soviet Union into the existing international order and encourage responsible behavior on the world stage. However, the League's ineffectiveness in addressing the challenges posed by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy ultimately rendered its significance limited.
The Nazi-Soviet Pact of August 1939 sent shockwaves through Europe and shattered any remaining illusions of a united front against Hitler. From the British perspective, the pact confirmed their worst fears about Soviet intentions, portraying Stalin as an opportunistic and untrustworthy leader. The pact also had the effect of further poisoning Anglo-Soviet relations, making any form of meaningful cooperation virtually impossible.
In conclusion, British policy towards the USSR during the 1930s was characterized by a combination of continuity and change. While the underlying distrust of Soviet communism remained a constant, there were notable attempts at rapprochement, driven by geopolitical considerations and a shared concern over the rise of Nazi Germany. However, these attempts were ultimately unsuccessful, hampered by ideological differences, mutual suspicion, and a series of events that deepened the mistrust between the two countries. The Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939 marked the culmination of this process, leaving Anglo-Soviet relations in a state of profound hostility on the eve of World War II.
Bibliography
Andrew, C. (2000). The Penguin History of Modern Britain: 1914 to the present. London: Penguin Books.
<br>
Roberts, J. (1999). Twentieth Century Britain. London: Longman.
<br>
Weinberg, G. L. (1995). A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Outline: To What Extent Did British Policy Towards the USSR Change During the 1930s?
This essay will explore the extent to which British policy towards the USSR changed during the 1930s. While Britain remained largely suspicious of the Soviet Union throughout the period, there were certain shifts in policy that warrant examination.
I. Continuity of Distrust:
Argument: The core of British policy remained consistent, rooted in an inherent distrust of communism.
⭐Conservative Governments: Dominance of Conservative governments, deeply suspicious of communism, viewed it as a greater threat than fascism.
⭐Soviet Actions: Soviet actions, such as aiding Spain's Republicans despite the non-intervention agreement, reinforced British distrust.
⭐Exclusion from Munich: The Soviet Union's exclusion from the Munich Conference, despite a defense pact with France and Czechoslovakia, further solidified British suspicion.
⭐Nazi-Soviet Pact: The 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact served as a culminating point, seemingly confirming British fears about Soviet intentions.
II. Moments of Shifting Policy:
Argument: Despite the prevailing distrust, British policy exhibited notable shifts:
⭐Labour Government's Initiatives: The Labour government in 1930 restored diplomatic relations and renewed trade deals with the USSR.
⭐League of Nations Invitation: The invitation extended to the USSR to join the League of Nations in 1934, without British objection, signals a potential for cooperation.
⭐Post-Czechoslovakia Shift: After the seizure of Czechoslovakia, Britain's concern for Poland led to attempts to draw the USSR into an anti-German agreement. This signifies a strategic shift, driven by the realization of British inability to directly defend Poland.
⭐Failed Negotiations: The breakdown of Anglo-Soviet negotiations, overshadowed by the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, represents a setback in attempts at cooperation and further exacerbated tensions.
III. Conclusion:
Synthesis: While British policy towards the USSR remained largely characterized by distrust throughout the 1930s, there were several moments of significant change in response to evolving geopolitical circumstances. However, these shifts were often overshadowed by the underlying suspicion of Soviet ideology and the ultimate betrayal of the Nazi-Soviet Pact, solidifying the prevailing distrust.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
To what extent did British policy towards the USSR change during the 1930s?
There will be a stronger case for ‘no change’ in that the UK remained largely suspicious of the Soviet Union throughout the period but there are changes that can be identified and explained and good candidates should be able to produce balanced accounts. Suggestions that there was basically no change may stem from an understanding that relations had largely been poor throughout the previous decade.
The 1930s continued to be dominated by Conservative governments which were largely distrustful of communism and considered it a greater threat than fascism. This distrust seemed justified when the SU sent aid to the Republicans in Spain despite signing the non-intervention agreement. Soviet Union was excluded from the Munich Conference despite it having a defence pact with France and Czechoslovakia. This distrust was further confirmed by the Nazi Soviet Pact in 1939.
A more positive policy can be identified at several points. In 1930 a Labour government restored diplomatic relations and renewed trade deals with the SU. In 1934 the SU was invited to join the League of Nations (with no objection from Britain). After the seizure of Czechoslovakia concern for Poland led to attempts to draw the SU into an anti-German agreement in support of Poland as Brit and France knew that they could not provide direct help in the event of a German invasion. A delegation was sent to Russia to negotiate but in the meantime Ribbentrop and Molotov were negotiating their Pact. This reduced Anglo-Soviet relations to an even worse level of hostility. Accept any other valid responses.