top of page

‘In the years 1858 to 1890, to what extent did British rule change India both economically and socially?’

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2022

Topic

The British Empire, c1857-1967

👑Complete Model Essay

‘In the years 1858 to 1890, to what extent did British rule change India both economically and socially?’

In the years 1858 to 1890, to what extent did British rule change India both economically and socially?

Following the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, the British Crown took direct control of India, ushering in an era known as the British Raj. This period witnessed significant changes in the economic and social fabric of India, with the impact of British rule remaining a subject of debate among historians. While some argue that British rule brought about positive transformations in education, infrastructure, and employment, others contend that it primarily benefited British interests at the expense of Indian industries and exacerbated existing social hierarchies. This essay will examine both sides of this complex historical period to assess the extent to which British rule changed India.

Social Changes: Education and the Caste System

One key area of social change during British rule was education. The British established universities in major cities like Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta, along with elite schools catering to the Indian aristocracy. These institutions, intended to create a class of anglicized Indians to assist in administration, did provide some Indians with access to Western education and opportunities in government service. Additionally, social reformers like Mary Carpenter worked to establish schools for girls, challenging traditional norms and promoting female literacy. However, the reach of this educational system was limited. The vast majority of the Indian population remained illiterate, with limited access to basic schooling.

Furthermore, while promoting Western education, British policies inadvertently impacted the caste system. The British, often operating with a sense of racial superiority, codified and solidified caste distinctions, sometimes even using them as a basis for administrative and employment practices. This hardening of the caste system further marginalized lower castes, hindering their social mobility and economic opportunities. The very system designed to produce a class of loyal British-educated Indians ironically ended up reinforcing existing social hierarchies.

Economic Changes: Infrastructure and Industrial Impact

British rule brought about significant economic changes, most visibly through the introduction of large-scale infrastructure projects. The British, recognizing the strategic importance of connectivity, oversaw the construction of an expansive railway network. This facilitated troop movement and trade, linking distant parts of the subcontinent and enabling the transportation of raw materials and manufactured goods. However, the economic benefits of the railway were not always equally distributed.

Moreover, the influx of cheaply produced British manufactured goods, particularly textiles, devastated India’s traditional handloom industry. This led to widespread unemployment and economic hardship among weavers, who formed the backbone of India's pre-colonial economy. The British also encouraged the cultivation of cash crops like cotton and indigo, often at the expense of food crops. This shift towards cash crop production, while profitable for British traders, made India increasingly vulnerable to famines and food shortages.

Limited Opportunities and Lasting Impacts

While some Indians benefited from new employment opportunities created by the British administration, in the army, police, and on the railways, these opportunities were often limited and did not significantly alter the socio-economic landscape for most Indians. The coveted Indian Civil Service, tasked with governing India, remained dominated by British officers. Even highly educated Indians faced significant barriers to entry and promotion within this service. The vast majority of the Indian population remained engaged in subsistence agriculture, with little change in their living standards.

Furthermore, the much-touted irrigation projects, while beneficial in some areas, were often designed to serve British economic interests and did not reach all corners of the country. The majority of India remained reliant on monsoon rains, leaving farmers vulnerable to droughts and crop failures. The economic policies of the British Raj, while introducing some modern elements, ultimately failed to address the underlying poverty and inequality that characterized Indian society.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while British rule from 1858 to 1890 did bring about some changes to India, both socially and economically, the extent of these changes was limited and often benefited British interests more than those of the Indian people. While some social progress occurred in education, particularly for women, and infrastructure development improved connectivity, these advancements were often overshadowed by the reinforcement of the caste system, the destruction of local industries, and the creation of a new economic dependency on Britain. The legacy of this period is complex and continues to be debated today, but it is undeniable that British rule left an indelible mark on India's social fabric and economic trajectory.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

In the years 1858 to 1890, to what extent did British rule change India both economically and socially?

This essay will examine the impact of British rule on India in the period from 1858 to 1890, focusing on the economic and social changes that occurred. It will consider arguments both supporting and challenging the view that British rule brought about significant transformation in these areas.

Arguments Supporting the View of Change

Social Change:


⭐The establishment of universities in Bombay/Mumbai, Madras/Chennai, and Calcutta/Kolkata, as well as elite schools, provided access to education for a select few Indians. This led to the emergence of a westernized elite who entered government service and contributed to the spread of Western ideas and values.
⭐Mary Carpenter's pioneering work in setting up schools for girls challenged traditional gender roles and provided opportunities for female education.


Economic Change:


⭐The construction of public works schemes, such as the railway network, provided jobs for Indians and facilitated trade and communication within India.
⭐The expansion of the civil service, army, police, and railways created new employment opportunities for Indians, although these were often limited to lower-level positions.
⭐Britain's demand for Indian agricultural products, such as cotton and indigo, generated income for some Indian farmers. Similarly, the influx of cheap British goods provided consumers with access to new and affordable products.


Arguments Challenging the View of Change

Limited Social Impact:


⭐Despite educational institutions, access to education remained limited for most Indians, and illiteracy continued to be widespread. The benefits of education were largely confined to the elite, while the majority of the population remained largely untouched by these changes.


Persistent Poverty and Hardship:


⭐Poverty, poor health, and famines continued to plague large segments of the Indian population. The British focus on revenue collection and the exploitation of resources often led to widespread economic hardship and famine.


Limited Economic Opportunities:


⭐While some Indians benefited from new employment opportunities, the majority continued to be subsistence farmers with little access to the benefits of the expanding economy. The civil service remained largely dominated by British administrators, limiting opportunities for Indian advancement.
⭐The railway network was primarily built for strategic purposes, to facilitate the movement of troops and maintain control over the vast territory. Its economic benefits, while present, were not as extensive as claimed.
⭐Irrigation schemes, though built, were primarily focused on increasing the production of cash crops for British markets, not on improving the livelihoods of the majority of Indians who relied on subsistence farming.


Conclusion

While British rule did bring about some economic and social changes in India, it is crucial to acknowledge that these changes were often limited in scope and unevenly distributed. The benefits were largely concentrated among a small elite, while the majority of the population continued to face poverty, hardship, and limited opportunities. The period from 1858 to 1890 witnessed a complex interplay of progress and exploitation, leaving a lasting impact on Indian society and its economic structure.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Arguments supporting the view
• British rule resulted in social change in India in the area of education as universities were established, such as the ones in Bombay/Mumbai, Madras/Chennai and Calcutta/Kolkata and elite schools were set up. Schools were also set up by Mary Carpenter for girls. Many Indians were educated in these institutions and a lot went on to enter government service
• post-1858 British rule saw a greater degree of separation and a hardening of racial superiority which intensified the Indian caste system, making it harder for those in the lower castes to find employment
• British rule resulted in economic change, as for example public works’ schemes were instigated and the railway network was built. Indian people were able to access jobs in the civil service, army, police and on the railways
• Britain offered a market for Indian agricultural products and provided the Indian people with cheap British goods
• economically British rule resulted in negative change for India as the import of cheap British manufactured products meant that India’s existing textile industries were destroyed. British rule encouraged a reliance on cash crops at the cost of lower value grains which were the main food staple for most of the population resulting in India becoming reliant on food imports.

Arguments challenging the view
• although educational institutions were set up, there were very few opportunities for most Indians to access educational institutions, and illiteracy remained widespread
• poverty, poor health and famine continued for many Indians
• some Indians had access to new employment opportunities, for most though this was denied them. For example, the civil service was staffed with British administrators with few opportunities for Indians to have a say, and even those with education found it hard to obtain promotion beyond the lower ranks. The majority of Indian people continued to be subsistence farmers
• the railway building scheme provided little economic change as its purpose was defensive, the British used it to move troops around India to deter further rebellions
• irrigation building schemes were not widespread and were built to support British, not Indian, economic interest. The majority of India remained unirrigated.

bottom of page