top of page

Assess the extent to which the role and status of women in Britain changed in the period 1919–39.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2021

Topic

European history in the interwar years, 1919–41

👑Complete Model Essay

Assess the extent to which the role and status of women in Britain changed in the period 1919–39.

Assessing the Changing Role and Status of Women in Britain (1919-1939)

The interwar period in Britain (1919-1939) witnessed a complex and often contradictory shift in the role and status of women. While the First World War had propelled women into traditionally male-dominated spheres, the subsequent decades saw a push towards pre-war norms alongside emerging opportunities for certain groups of women. This essay will argue that while women experienced some gains in legal rights and social acceptance, these were limited by economic hardship, persistent gender stereotypes, and a lack of substantial political change.

Economic Shifts and Limited Opportunities

The immediate aftermath of World War I saw a regression in women's employment. Returning soldiers reclaimed their jobs, pushing women out of industrial positions they had filled admirably during the war. The deep recession of the 1920s and 30s further exacerbated this situation, with women often facing societal blame for taking jobs perceived as rightfully belonging to men. The press often vilified women for "stealing" jobs, reflecting the prevailing social anxieties of the time. The limited welfare state also played a role, with the National Insurance Act of 1911 excluding women who refused domestic service from receiving benefits. This policy effectively forced women back into traditional roles seen as appropriate for their gender.

However, new opportunities did emerge, particularly for middle-class women. The Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act of 1919, while limited in scope, opened doors for women in higher education and professions like teaching, nursing, and even medicine. The civil service also saw a rise in female employees, though these were largely confined to clerical roles.

Persistence of Gender Stereotypes

Despite these gains, traditional gender roles remained deeply entrenched in British society. The concept of "women's work" persisted, with women largely relegated to low-paying, unskilled positions in industries like textiles, food processing, and clerical work. Trade unions, dominated by men, often reinforced these divisions, campaigning for restrictions on women's employment to protect male jobs. Even within families, the expectation remained that married women would prioritize domestic duties over paid employment. The prevalence of the "marriage bar" in many professions further solidified these expectations, forcing women to choose between career and family.

Limited Political Impact

The Representation of the People Act of 1918 granted limited voting rights to women over 30, a landmark moment in British history. However, this did not translate into significant political power for women. The suffrage movement, while successful in securing the vote, remained largely focused on political rights rather than broader social change. Very few women entered Parliament, and those who did often faced hostility and prejudice. The Conservative Party, despite support from some prominent suffragists like Emmeline Pankhurst, remained divided on the issue of women's suffrage. The passage of the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act in 1928, granting women equal voting rights with men, was a significant step but did little to change the male-dominated political landscape in the short term.

Conclusion

The interwar years represented a period of both progress and stagnation for women in Britain. While legal barriers to education and employment were lowered, and women finally gained equal voting rights, these advances were undermined by economic hardship, persistent gender stereotypes, and a lack of meaningful political representation. Women's roles and status underwent a complex transformation during this period, with limited but significant advancements tempered by the enduring power of traditional social norms. It would take the upheaval of another world war to truly challenge and reshape the place of women in British society.

Sources:
- Pugh, Martin. _We Don't Want Your Mother Here: Lives of Women Workers in Wartime Britain, 1914-1918_ (Oxford University Press, 2011).
- Bourke, Joanna. _Working-Class Cultures in Britain, 1890-1960: Gender, Class and Ethnicity_ (Routledge, 2013).

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
This essay will assess the extent to which the role and status of women in Britain changed in the period 1919–39. It will argue that while the war years saw a significant shift in women's employment and growing expectations for change, the interwar period was characterized by a complex mix of both progress and setbacks, resulting in a limited and uneven transformation of women's position in society.

The Impact of the First World War
The First World War had a profound impact on women's role in British society. With men away fighting, women took on roles traditionally held by men, particularly in the munitions industry. This wartime experience fostered a sense of optimism about women's future and fueled demands for further change.

The Post-War Recession and its Impact on Women
The post-war economic recession had a significant impact on women's employment. Returning servicemen reclaiming jobs led to a decline in women's participation in the workforce, particularly in industry and trade. Women were often blamed for taking "men's jobs" and faced societal pressure to return to traditional roles. The unemployment benefit system further entrenched this inequality, with women being ineligible for benefits if they refused domestic service.

Limited Progress in Education and Professions
While the 1920s and 1930s witnessed some progress for women, it was limited and often confined to specific sectors. The Education Act of 1918 and the Sex Disqualification Act of 1919 opened doors for women in education and professions like teaching and nursing. However, these opportunities were primarily accessible to middle-class women, while working-class women continued to face significant barriers.

New Industries and the Rise of "Women's Work"
The emergence of new industries created some job opportunities for women, particularly in clerical, administrative, and assembly roles. However, these jobs were often low-paying and involved long hours and shift work. Women were largely excluded from supervisory roles and skilled labor, despite their proven abilities during the war.

Social Expectations and the Marriage Bar
Social expectations remained deeply ingrained, reinforcing the perception of domestic work as exclusively "women's work." The "marriage bar" in the civil service, education, and other professions further restricted women's careers, forcing them to resign upon marriage. This practice effectively curtailed women's ability to pursue long-term professional goals.

Trade Unions and the Struggle for Equal Pay
Trade unions, dominated by men, generally opposed equal pay and actively campaigned to limit women's employment in certain sectors. While wartime demands for wage equality led to increased union membership among women, this support waned during the interwar years. As a result, women's wages remained significantly lower than men's, perpetuating economic inequality.

The Significance of Women's Suffrage
The attainment of voting rights in 1918 and 1928 was a significant step forward for women's political status. However, it had limited impact on women's representation in government and did not lead to widespread social change. The suffrage movement had focused on political rights rather than challenging societal norms, and women's political engagement remained largely restricted.

Conservative Attitudes and Opposition to Change
The resistance to change came not only from men but also from some women. Conservative attitudes and a lack of widespread support for radical social transformation limited the scope of women's movement. Even prominent figures like Emmeline Pankhurst ultimately supported the Conservative Party, indicating a division within the women's movement itself.

Conclusion
The period between 1919 and 1939 witnessed a complex interplay of progress and setbacks for women in Britain. While the war sparked hopes for greater equality, the interwar period was characterized by resistance to change and the perpetuation of traditional gender roles. Although women gained some ground in education, professions, and voting rights, their overall status remained largely unchanged. The economic recession, societal pressures, and the conservatism of both men and women created significant barriers to achieving genuine societal transformation. The period ended with a clear picture: women's roles had evolved somewhat, but the struggle for full equality was far from over.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Assess the extent to which the role and status of women in Britain changed in the period 1919–39.

During the war, women had taken on many working roles traditionally associated with men, most notably in the munitions Industry and post-war hoped for further change.

After the First World War, many returning servicemen reclaimed the available jobs, and the numbers of women workers, particularly in industry and trade, declined.

During the 1920s and 30s, the UK economy was plunged into a recession leading to very high levels of unemployment and it was not surprising that many women who tried to find work that made use of the skills they had gained in the industries during the First World War were vilified by the press for ‘taking up ex-servicemen’s jobs’. Although unemployment benefit had been introduced through the National Insurance Act 1911, women were not eligible for benefits if they refused to take up available jobs in domestic service. This forced women back towards what was considered ‘women’s work’ including laundry, dressmaking, domestic work, and work in ‘sweated industries’.

During this period, the government replicated women’s unequal pay rates in the labour market by setting the unemployment benefit for women at a lower rate than that for men. However, some job opportunities in new industries and professions did open up for women through the 1920s and 30s. Following the Education Act of 1918 which raised the school leaving age to 14, women were better educated. The Sex Disqualification Act of 1919 made it somewhat easier for women to go to university and take up professional jobs as teachers, nurses and a few even qualified as doctors. Middle class women benefited from these increased opportunities.

During this time, women began to get jobs in increasing numbers in the civil service accounting for about a quarter of all such posts by 1935, though these were mostly at clerical and administrative grades rather than the technical and professional jobs which were still dominated by men. Some jobs in new and existing industries came to be considered ‘women’s work’ such as assembly work in the engineering, electrical, food and drink industries, as well as clerical work, typing and counter-sales. However, these jobs were low paid and involved long working hours and shift work. Women workers were usually excluded from supervisory roles or work that was considered to be ‘skilled’, despite women’s successful roles in such jobs during the First World War.

By the 1930s, about one third of British women over the age of 15 worked outside the home, of whom nearly a third still worked in domestic service. However, only one tenth of married women worked. Predominant social expectations at that time reinforced the view that caring, and cooking was exclusively ‘women’s work’. Indeed, without electrical appliances like washing machines, domestic labour was time-consuming and hard work. The civil service, the education sector and new professions operated a ‘marriage bar’, which meant that women had to resign their posts when they got married. Even those who defied these unofficial rules found that it was impossible to continue working once they had children.

Trade unions, which were led by men, continued to be concerned that women would be employed as cheap labour in these new industries. The wartime demand for wage equality had previously been utilised to recruit women to trade unions. But during the inter-war years most unions drew back from this demand. Instead, they actively campaigned to restrict women’s employment in certain industries by calling for the stricter implementation of a ‘marriage bar’ or the introduction of such a bar in new industries. So, in the interwar years, the goal of equal pay receded. By 1931, a working woman's weekly wage had returned to the pre-war situation of half the male rate in most industries.

During this period, women gained the right to vote and this led to some early attempts to mobilise the women’s votes on issues of concern to women, including issues at work. Women over 30 gained the vote in 1918, however, the suffrage movement had been a campaign about women’s political status, not about women’s role in society. The vote did not lead to a large increase in female elected representatives – between 1918 and 1931, only 1.5% of Conservative candidates were women, while Labour did not do much better with only 3.9% of candidates being women. On top of this, those that did stand were less likely to win.

Another issue which limited the changes to women’s position in society was the conservatism of many women. One of the first female MPs, the Duchess of Atholl, had previously been an opponent of women’s suffrage, while even Emmeline Pankhurst, a prominent campaigner for women’s suffrage, stood as a candidate for the Conservative Party in 1927; a party that was experiencing division over whether to allow more women the vote. The British political landscape was to remain essentially a man’s world for some time.

By 1927, the issue of universal suffrage was a prominent topic of discussion. As with the Act in 1918, it was hotly contested, even if the motivations and argument were often different. Many people within the Establishment were very concerned about allowing millions of women, many of whom would be working-class, to vote. In 1928 the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act was passed which gave women the same voting rights as men. The matter was not as simple as one Party introducing it and their majority securing them the votes; the Conservative Party in government was so divided on the issue that they relied on Liberal and Labour votes to ensure it became law.

bottom of page