top of page

Assess the impact that the Soviet regime had on families.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2021

Topic

European history in the interwar years, 1919–41

👑Complete Model Essay

Assess the impact that the Soviet regime had on families.

The Impact of the Soviet Regime on Families

The Soviet regime's impact on families was profound and multifaceted, marked by periods of radical change and later, a return to more traditional values. While early Bolshevik policies aimed to dismantle the traditional family structure, Stalin's regime shifted towards promoting "traditional" family values, albeit within the context of a socialist state.

Early Bolshevik Reforms (1917-1935)

The early Bolsheviks, influenced by Marxist ideology, viewed the traditional family as a bourgeois construct that perpetuated gender inequality. Lenin's government implemented reforms that aimed to dismantle this structure. The 1926 Family Code, for instance, enshrined women's rights, granting equal rights in marriage, simplified divorce procedures, and legalized abortion.

In the largely Muslim regions within the Soviet Union, the regime tackled feudal practices. Raising the minimum marriage age for girls to 16 and outlawing polygamy and bride prices were key steps. The 'khudzhum' movement actively engaged women in challenging traditional norms, while education was promoted equally for boys and girls.

Moreover, the state invested in social support systems to enable women to participate in the workforce. State-funded nurseries, workplace crèches, and canteens were established. These measures aimed to alleviate the burden of childcare and housework traditionally shouldered by women.

Stalinist Shift: Promoting Traditional Family (1936-1953)

Stalin's rise to power marked a turning point. With the looming threat of war and declining birth rates, the focus shifted to population growth and strengthening the Soviet state. This led to a partial reversal of earlier policies and a return to a more conservative stance on family values.

While the 1926 Code's fundamental rights remained, the 1936 family law made divorces more difficult and expensive. Abortion was restricted to medical necessity. Incentives like tax exemptions for larger families aimed at boosting the birth rate. By 1944, only registered marriages were recognized, further reinforcing traditional family structures.

Despite the emphasis on traditional families, Stalin's regime continued to value women's contributions to the workforce. In fact, women were actively encouraged to participate in the industrialization drive. By 1939, women constituted a significant portion of professionals, with a third of engineers and a staggering 79% of doctors being women. Women enjoyed equal rights in employment and access to education.

However, this equality had its limitations. Women predominantly occupied roles in traditionally female-dominated fields like textiles and services. The 'double burden' of work and domestic responsibilities persisted for many women, with societal expectations still heavily skewed towards women as primary caregivers. While the Stakhanovite movement showcased female "hero-workers," men continued to dominate higher administrative positions.

Conclusion

The Soviet regime's impact on families was a complex interplay of revolutionary ideals and pragmatic adjustments. While the early Bolshevik era witnessed a radical restructuring of family life, Stalin's reign saw a return to more traditional values, albeit within a framework that still emphasized women's economic participation and legal equality. The Soviet experience provides a compelling example of the challenges and contradictions inherent in attempting to reshape societal norms and family structures within the context of a rapidly changing world.

**Source:**

European history in the interwar years, 1919–41, History Essay

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
Briefly outline Lenin's initial stance on family as a bourgeois construct and early Soviet reforms that aimed to dismantle traditional family structures. Transition to mentioning the shift in Stalin's era with a focus on population growth and a more "traditional" approach.

Early Soviet Policies (Lenin's era)
Elaborate on the early reforms, including the Family Code of 1926, and their impact on family life. Discuss the specific challenges and reforms implemented in Muslim regions, highlighting the push for women's rights and social change.

Stalinist Era: A Shift in Focus
Explain the rationale behind Stalin's policy shift in 1935 towards promoting "traditional" family values. Detail the changes introduced in the 1936 family law, including restrictions on divorce and abortion, and incentives for larger families. Discuss the impact of these measures on family size and structure.

Women in the Workforce
Highlight the significant role of women in the Soviet workforce, particularly under Stalin. Provide statistics showcasing the rise in female employment across various sectors. Analyze the factors contributing to this trend, including state-sponsored education and employment opportunities.

Contradictions and Limitations
Address the contradictions within Stalin's policies, such as promoting traditional family roles while simultaneously encouraging women's participation in the workforce. Discuss the persistence of traditional gender roles and inequalities despite legal equality. Mention the "double burden" faced by many women.

Comparison with Nazi Germany
Briefly compare and contrast the Soviet approach to women and family with that of Nazi Germany. Emphasize the stark differences in ideology and policies, highlighting the Soviet Union's commitment to gender equality, even with its limitations.

Conclusion
Summarize the overall impact of the Soviet regime on families, acknowledging both the progressive reforms and the complexities and contradictions that arose. Offer a balanced perspective on the successes and limitations of Soviet policies in achieving true equality within the family structure.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Assess the impact that the Soviet regime had on families.

Lenin had been anti-family, seeing it as a bourgeois construct and allowing easier divorces and abortions. In 1926, a new Family Code consolidated earlier rights, and gave women in ‘common law’ marriages the same rights as those in registered marriages.

In Muslim regions, where feudal forms of social structure remained, women were a subject class. The communists raised the minimum age of marriage in these regions to 16 (it was 18 in the European parts of Soviet Russia), and polygamy and bride money were banned. They also organised mass political activity, known as the khudzhum, to mobilise women to oppose traditional practices. At the same time, education was provided equally for both males and females. State nurseries and workplace crèches and canteens were provided to enable mothers to work outside the home.

However, under Stalin some of these reforms and benefits were reduced or removed. Fear of war was growing following Hitler’s rise to power in Germany in 1933, and Soviet population growth was in decline. For these reasons, from 1935 Stalin decided on policies to promote ‘traditional’ family values in order to increase the Soviet population.

Although most of the rights established by the 1926 Code remained intact, a new family law was introduced in 1936. This made divorce more difficult, with a rising fee for each divorce, and restricted abortion to those required for medical reasons only. In addition, in order to encourage bigger families and so raise the birth rate, tax exemptions were given to families with large numbers of children. From 1944, only registered marriages were recognised, children born outside marriage were no longer allowed to inherit property from their father, and divorce became even more difficult and expensive.

During the Second World War, medals were awarded to mothers with large families and unmarried people were taxed more heavily. However, women benefited from new welfare reforms introduced under Stalin – a free health service, accident insurance at work, the expansion of kindergartens for working mothers with children, and paid holidays for many workers. Equal educational provision continued. Nonetheless, the provision of sufficient and adequate housing continued to be a problem.

In employment, women had traditionally been found mainly in agriculture, textiles, and services. Their position improved considerably under the Bolsheviks, and even more so under Stalin’s rule. Women were actively encouraged to play their part in the economic development of Soviet Russia, and all employment was thrown open to women, who had the same rights as men. By 1939, a third of all engineers and 79% of doctors were women. In 1928, the number of women listed as ‘workers–employees’ had been 2,795,000. By 1939, this had risen to just over 13 million. By 1933, women made up 33% of the industrial workforce, rising to 43% by 1940. Despite the emphasis on family life during the 1930s, women of all ages continued to work.

There were many women ‘hero-workers’ in the Stakhanovite movement, though in a smaller proportion than men; by 1936, a quarter of all female trade unionists were classified as workers who had exceeded their production targets. However, access to the higher administrative posts was unequal and the patriarchal tradition was still widespread in society, leaving many working women with the bulk of household chores.

Despite these realities, the attitude of the Stalinist state to women was very different from that in Nazi Germany. Communists believed in total equality between the sexes in education, employment, and the law.

bottom of page