top of page

How far does your site enable historians to understand the everyday life and attitudes of people who lived there?

Level

GCSE

Year Examined

2021

Topic

Historical Sites

👑Complete Model Essay

How far does your site enable historians to understand the everyday life and attitudes of people who lived there?

Introduction
This essay will examine the Roman city of Pompeii, preserved by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, to assess how effectively it reveals the everyday life and attitudes of its inhabitants. Located in southern Italy, Pompeii offers a unique snapshot of Roman life frozen in time. By analysing the city's physical remains, from houses and shops to public buildings and artefacts, we can gain insights into various aspects of daily life for Pompeii's diverse population. However, this understanding is not without its limitations, particularly regarding the nuances of social attitudes and the experiences of certain social groups.

Body Paragraph 1: Work and Commerce in Pompeii
The physical layout and structures of Pompeii provide a vivid understanding of work and commerce within the city. Pompeii's forum, a bustling marketplace surrounded by shops and businesses, exemplifies this. The remnants of bakeries with millstones and ovens, alongside shops with counters displaying preserved goods, illustrate the daily routines of bakers, shopkeepers, and customers. Furthermore, the discovery of tools and workshops, such as those used by blacksmiths and weavers, illuminates the skilled trades practiced within the city. These physical remnants offer tangible evidence of the economic activities that shaped Pompeii, revealing the work that consumed a significant portion of its inhabitants' lives.

Body Paragraph 2: Social Hierarchy in Pompeii
The stark contrast in the size and decoration of houses in Pompeii reveals the social hierarchy that existed within Roman society. The lavishly decorated walls and spacious interiors of the House of the Faun, believed to have belonged to a wealthy family, stand in stark contrast to the more modest dwellings found in other areas of the city. The presence of intricate mosaics and frescoes in wealthier homes, depicting scenes of leisure and mythology, further emphasizes the disparity in lifestyles. This physical evidence illustrates how wealth dictated access to comfort, leisure, and social standing within Pompeii.

Body Paragraph 3: Limitations of Pompeii's Evidence
While Pompeii offers invaluable insights into Roman life, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations of relying solely on its physical remains. Understanding the attitudes and beliefs of Pompeii's residents is challenging. While murals and graffiti provide glimpses into their thoughts, these are often fragmented and open to interpretation. Moreover, the experiences of marginalized groups, such as slaves and the very poor, are less well-represented archaeologically. Their voices and perspectives are largely absent from the physical record, limiting our understanding of the full spectrum of life in Pompeii. To address this, historians must rely on complementary sources like Roman literature and legal texts to gain a broader understanding of societal attitudes and the experiences of marginalized groups.

Conclusion
In conclusion, Pompeii's remarkably preserved remains offer invaluable insights into the everyday lives of its inhabitants, particularly regarding work, commerce, and social structures. The physical evidence vividly illustrates the activities that filled their days, the social dynamics that shaped their interactions, and the disparities in wealth and living conditions. However, it is essential to recognize the limitations of relying solely on physical evidence, particularly in understanding the complexities of social attitudes and the experiences of less visible social groups. By combining archaeological evidence with other sources, we can strive for a more nuanced and complete understanding of life in Pompeii and the wider Roman world.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
Briefly introduce your chosen historical site. State its location and historical significance. Briefly mention the time periods you will focus on. Clearly state your argument - how far does the site reveal the everyday life and attitudes of the people who lived there? Is this understanding limited to certain aspects or time periods?

Body Paragraph 1: Aspect 1 of Everyday Life (e.g., Work/Religion/Leisure)
Choose one specific aspect of everyday life. Describe a physical feature at the site that reveals information about this aspect. Provide specific examples and explain what they tell us about the daily routines, tasks, or activities of the people. For example, at Fountains Abbey, the presence of nine altars reveals the importance of religious rituals in the lives of the monks. Analyze how effectively this evidence reveals their everyday experiences. Were there limitations in understanding the full picture?

Body Paragraph 2: Aspect 2 of Everyday Life (e.g., Social Hierarchy/Family Life)
Focus on a different aspect of everyday life. Identify a physical feature that sheds light on this aspect. For example, at Kenilworth Castle, the luxurious additions made by Robert Dudley to impress Queen Elizabeth I tell us about courtly life and the pursuit of power and prestige. Analyze how this feature enhances our understanding of social dynamics, relationships, or beliefs. Again, consider any limitations in interpreting the evidence.

Body Paragraph 3: Comparison Across Time Periods (If Applicable)
If your site spans different time periods, compare how effectively each period is represented through physical remains. For instance, you might compare the evidence revealing the lives of monks at Fountains Abbey with evidence from a later period when the site may have been used differently. Analyze which period is better understood through physical remains and explain why.

Body Paragraph 4: Limitations and Alternative Sources
Acknowledge any limitations in understanding everyday life and attitudes solely based on the physical features. What aspects might be difficult to uncover through archaeology or architectural analysis alone? Mention other types of sources (written documents, paintings, etc.) that could complement the physical evidence and provide a more complete picture.

Conclusion
Reiterate your overall argument, summarizing the key points you have discussed. Briefly restate the strengths and weaknesses of the site in revealing everyday life and attitudes. End with a final thought or reflection on the value of studying historical sites to understand the past.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

The Question Focus
The question focuses on criterion K and E. It also allows candidates to draw on criteria C, D, H and N.

Understanding Lives and Attitudes
Candidates should draw on physical features of the site in order to assess the extent to which the people’s lives and attitudes can effectively be understood from the existing remains.

Comparative Approaches
Responses may achieve this by comparing different periods in the site’s history, e.g., the secrecy surrounding exercises by the volunteers of the Royal Observer Corps No. 20 Group at their HQ at Shelley House, York, in preparing for a nuclear attack and the subsequent use of the nuclear bunker after the fall of the Soviet Union for educational purposes about the Cold War by local school children visiting the site.

Instead, they may consider diversity at a given point in the site’s history (e.g., comparisons of the religious activities of monks using the nine altars at Fountains Abbey and the work of lay brothers in sheep farming on the Grange).

Stronger Responses
Stronger answers may consider activities from different periods in the site’s history. Responses may consider why certain periods enable greater understanding.

For example, comparing the building work to strengthen and develop the defensive use of Kenilworth Castle (as a result of its strategic location and the need to assert royal authority by Henry II following the Anarchy) differed from the building alterations to the keep and gatehouse by Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester for the purposes of impressing and entertaining Elizabeth to whom he was devoted and sought favour. In this case both attitudes can be ascertained through studying the existing remains but more effectively from the latter.

Such comparison over different periods may be a feature of high-level responses.

bottom of page