top of page

How effective was civil disobedience in resisting apartheid in the period from 1970 to 1976?

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2022

Topic

Non-British period study: Apartheid and reconciliation: South African politics 1948-1999

👑Complete Model Essay

How effective was civil disobedience in resisting apartheid in the period from 1970 to 1976?

How Effective Was Civil Disobedience in Resisting Apartheid in the Period from 1970 to 1976?

Civil disobedience played a crucial, yet ultimately limited, role in resisting apartheid in South Africa between 1970 and 1976. While it contributed to the rise of the Black Consciousness movement and fostered awareness of the system's injustices, its effectiveness was significantly hampered by the government's brutal repression and the absence of meaningful reforms. This essay will argue that while civil disobedience generated momentum for resistance, it was ultimately insufficient in achieving the dismantling of apartheid during this period.

The Rise of Black Consciousness and the Effectiveness of Civil Disobedience

Civil disobedience, particularly in the form of boycotts, protests, and strikes, contributed significantly to the emergence and growth of the Black Consciousness movement. This movement, spearheaded by figures like Steve Biko, emphasized black pride, self-reliance, and the need for collective action to challenge apartheid. Black Consciousness challenged the racial hierarchy embedded in apartheid, fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose among black South Africans. Notably, the 1976 Soweto uprising, triggered by the imposition of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction, was a powerful manifestation of the Black Consciousness movement's influence, showcasing the capacity of civil disobedience to galvanize widespread resistance.

The Limits of Civil Disobedience: Repression and Suppression

Despite its effectiveness in raising awareness and fostering collective action, civil disobedience faced significant limitations in the face of the South African government's relentless repression. The government responded to protests with increasing brutality, enacting draconian laws that restricted civil liberties, limited freedom of speech, and banned political organizations like the African National Congress (ANC) and the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC). The establishment of the Police Reserve Unit, a paramilitary force specifically designed to suppress black activism, further solidified the government's ability to quash protests. The brutal response to the Soweto uprising, where hundreds were killed, exemplified the government's ruthlessness and the chilling effect it had on future protests.

The Lack of Political Reform and the Ineffectiveness of Civil Disobedience

The South African government's unwavering commitment to apartheid and its refusal to consider meaningful reforms further undermined the effectiveness of civil disobedience. Even after the Soweto uprising, the government remained resistant to any concessions, demonstrating its commitment to preserving the racial hierarchy. The Soweto students' demands for educational reform, which were met with violence, highlighted the government's intransigence and its lack of willingness to engage in constructive dialogue. Without a willingness to engage in meaningful reforms, civil disobedience, despite its effectiveness in generating pressure, remained insufficient in dismantling apartheid.

Conclusion: Civil Disobedience as a Catalyst for Change

Civil disobedience in the period from 1970 to 1976 was a crucial catalyst for change, contributing to the rise of the Black Consciousness movement and igniting widespread resistance to apartheid. However, its effectiveness was significantly limited by the government's unrelenting repression and unwillingness to consider reforms. While civil disobedience helped expose the injustices of apartheid and mobilize the black population, it was ultimately unable to achieve the goal of dismantling the system in this period. The government's heavy-handed tactics and refusal to engage in meaningful dialogue ensured that civil disobedience, while powerful, remained insufficient in bringing about the desired political change.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

How effective was civil disobedience in resisting apartheid in the period from 1970 to 1976?

This essay will argue that civil disobedience was partially effective in resisting apartheid in the period from 1970 to 1976. It contributed to the development of the Black Consciousness movement, which helped to generate awareness of the injustices of apartheid and link protest movements. However, it was ultimately ineffective in achieving the goals of dismantling apartheid, as the South African government's repressive legislation and the establishment of the Police Reserve Unit hampered the effectiveness of protests. The Sharpeville massacre in 1960, which was a direct result of government policy in response to civil disobedience, had a chilling effect on future protest. The government's refusal to consider reforms, such as those requested in Soweto in 1976, further undermined the effectiveness of civil disobedience. Political organisations, such as the ANC and the PAC, failed to achieve their aims of undoing apartheid.

Argument 1: Civil Disobedience and the Black Consciousness Movement

Civil disobedience played a crucial role in fostering the rise of the Black Consciousness movement. The movement emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s, advocating for black self-reliance and resistance to apartheid. The movement was inspired by the actions of individuals and groups who used civil disobedience to challenge apartheid laws and practices. Examples include the defiance campaigns of the 1950s, which involved mass boycotts and protests, and the student protests of the 1970s, which highlighted the oppressive nature of apartheid education. The Black Consciousness movement gave voice to black South Africans who were tired of being marginalized and silenced. It provided a platform for collective action and a sense of unity and purpose.

Argument 2: Limitations of Civil Disobedience

Despite its contribution to the Black Consciousness movement, civil disobedience faced significant obstacles in its efforts to dismantle apartheid. The South African government responded to protests with brutal force. The establishment of the Police Reserve Unit in 1970, specifically designed to suppress dissent, resulted in many deaths and injuries among protesters. The government's repressive legislation further restricted the effectiveness of civil disobedience by criminalizing protests and imposing harsh penalties. The Sharpeville massacre in 1960 served as a stark reminder of the government's ruthlessness. This incident, which resulted in the deaths of 69 unarmed protesters, had a chilling effect, deterring many from participating in future protests.


Argument 3: Lack of Political Reforms

The South African government's refusal to consider reforms also undermined the effectiveness of civil disobedience. In 1976, students in Soweto protested against the imposition of Afrikaans as the medium of instruction in schools. The government's violent response to the student uprisings, which left hundreds dead and wounded, demonstrated its unwillingness to engage with the demands of the black community. The government's resistance to reforms, even in the face of widespread protests, further discouraged the use of civil disobedience as a means of achieving change.


Argument 4: Limited Success of Political Organisations

Political organisations such as the ANC and the PAC, which advocated for the dismantling of apartheid, also struggled to achieve their goals. Despite using civil disobedience as a tactic, these organisations faced significant challenges in their fight against the apartheid regime. The government's ban of the ANC and PAC in 1960 significantly weakened their ability to organize and mobilize effectively. These organisations were forced to operate underground, which limited their reach and effectiveness in challenging the apartheid system.


Conclusion: Partial Effectiveness

In conclusion, civil disobedience was partially effective in resisting apartheid in the period from 1970 to 1976. It contributed to the development of the Black Consciousness movement, which raised awareness of the injustices of apartheid and fostered collective action. However, the government's repressive measures, including the establishment of the Police Reserve Unit and its brutal response to protests, combined with its refusal to consider reforms, significantly hampered the effectiveness of civil disobedience. The Sharpeville massacre and the Soweto uprising serve as stark reminders of the government's unwillingness to address the demands of the black community. The limited success of political organisations such as the ANC and the PAC further underscores the challenges faced in resisting apartheid through non-violent means. Despite the limitations, civil disobedience played a vital role in challenging apartheid and raising international awareness of the injustices faced by black South Africans.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Civil Disobedience and Apartheid (1970-1976)
Civil disobedience was partially effective in resisting apartheid in the period from 1970 to 1976. It contributed to the development of the Black Consciousness movement, which helped to generate awareness of the injustices of apartheid and link protest movements.

However, civil disobedience was ultimately ineffective in achieving the goals of dismantling apartheid. The South African government’s repressive legislation and the establishment of the Police Reserve Unit hampered the effectiveness of protests. The Sharpeville massacre in 1960, a direct result of government policy in response to civil disobedience, had a chilling effect on future protest. The government’s refusal to consider reforms, such as those requested in Soweto in 1976, further undermined the effectiveness of civil disobedience.

Political organisations, such as the ANC and the PAC, failed to achieve their aims of undoing apartheid.

bottom of page