How effective was Walpole as principal minister during the period from 1721 to 1742?
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2021
Topic
The making of Georgian Britain 1678-c.1760
👑Complete Model Essay
How effective was Walpole as principal minister during the period from 1721 to 1742?
The Effectiveness of Robert Walpole as Principal Minister (1721-1742)
Robert Walpole, often referred to as the first Prime Minister of Great Britain, served as Principal Minister from 1721 to 1742. His tenure was marked by a period of relative peace and economic stability. However, assessing his effectiveness is a complex task, requiring a nuanced consideration of his achievements and failures.
Walpole's Successes
Walpole's success lay in his ability to maintain political stability and secure the Hanoverian dynasty.
⭐Securing the Hanoverian Regime: Walpole's political acumen was evident in his adept management of the delicate situation following the death of Queen Anne in 1714. He was instrumental in ensuring the smooth transition of power to the Hanoverian dynasty, a crucial accomplishment that solidified the new regime's position.
⭐Surviving the Change of Monarch: Walpole demonstrated his enduring political influence by maintaining his position as Principal Minister even after the ascension of George II. This was a significant feat, particularly given George II's initial preference for Sir Spencer Compton. This solidified Walpole's control over the political landscape.
⭐Domination of Whig Allies: Walpole masterfully consolidated his power by cultivating a strong network of Whig allies. He skillfully distributed patronage, effectively securing their loyalty and consolidating his control over Parliament. This strategy allowed him to maintain a solid majority, effectively neutralizing any opposition.
⭐Promoting Commerce and Parliament: Walpole's policies favored the interests of those involved in commerce and Parliament. He implemented measures to encourage trade, particularly by reducing taxes on imports and exports. This approach boosted the economy and solidified his support among powerful business interests.
⭐Promoting Peace and Low Taxation: Walpole prioritized peace, recognizing its benefits for the economy and political stability. He avoided costly wars, favoring diplomacy and negotiations. This strategy kept taxation low and contributed to a period of economic prosperity.
⭐Crushing Jacobite Conspiracies: The Atterbury Plot of 1722, a Jacobite conspiracy aimed at overthrowing the Hanoverian regime, presented a serious threat. Walpole effectively thwarted this rebellion, further solidifying the Hanoverian dynasty's grip on power.
⭐Preventing Opposition Unity: Walpole was adept at preventing his opponents from forming a cohesive front against him. He shrewdly utilized patronage and political maneuvering to divide and weaken potential adversaries, ensuring his continued dominance.
⭐Winning Landed Support: Walpole astutely recognized the significance of landed support. He implemented policies that favored landed gentry, such as reducing land tax. This strategy effectively secured their loyalty and further strengthened his political position.
⭐National Debt Reduction: During Walpole's tenure, the national debt saw a notable reduction. This achievement was a testament to his fiscal management and highlighted his ability to navigate the complexities of the British economy.
Walpole's Limitations
Despite his evident successes, Walpole's tenure was not without flaws and failures.
⭐Persistence of the Jacobite Threat: While Walpole successfully crushed the Atterbury Plot, the Jacobite threat remained a persistent concern, eventually leading to the '45 Rebellion. This demonstrates that Walpole's efforts to secure the Hanoverian regime were not entirely successful in the long run.
⭐Patronage and Corruption: Walpole's reliance on patronage generated dissatisfaction amongst those who felt excluded from the distribution of favors. This strategy also fueled accusations of corruption, which contributed to a sense of unease and undermined his image.
⭐Financial Scandals: The period between 1725 and 1733 was marked by various financial scandals, including the South Sea Bubble. These scandals fueled criticism of Walpole's financial practices and cast a shadow over his administration.
⭐Failure of the Excise Bill: Walpole's attempt to introduce an Excise Bill in 1733 met with strong opposition and was ultimately defeated. This failure illustrated a significant weakness in his ability to effectively navigate public opinion and manage opposition.
⭐Limiting Domestic Criticism: While Walpole successfully maintained control of Parliament, he struggled to effectively limit domestic criticism. Publications like The Craftsman openly attacked his policies and administration, highlighting his difficulties in managing public discourse.
⭐Slipping Grip on Power: As the 1730s progressed, Walpole's hold on power began to weaken. The death of Queen Caroline in 1737 was a significant blow, as she had been a powerful and supportive ally. The emergence of the 'patriot Boys,' a group coalescing around the Prince of Wales, posed a growing challenge to Walpole's authority. The War of Jenkin's Ear (1739), though initially popular, ultimately contributed to further erosion of his political support.
Conclusion
Robert Walpole's legacy is a complex and contested one. He was undoubtedly a skilled politician who maintained stability and secured the Hanoverian dynasty. However, his reliance on patronage, his failures in managing domestic criticism, and the eventual erosion of his authority highlight the limitations of his leadership.
Ultimately, assessing Walpole's effectiveness is a matter of perspective. While his achievements in securing the Hanoverian regime and promoting economic stability are undeniable, his shortcomings in addressing corruption and sustaining political control paint a more nuanced picture. His tenure represents a period of both success and challenges, leaving a lasting impact on British politics and history.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
How effective was Walpole as principal minister during the period from 1721 to 1742?
Introduction:
Briefly introduce Robert Walpole and his role as principal minister. Establish the timeframe of his ministry (1721-1742). Present the argument that while Walpole enjoyed successes as Prime Minister, his effectiveness waned towards the end of his tenure, ultimately leading to his downfall.
Arguments for Walpole's Effectiveness:
Securing the Hanoverian Regime:
Explain how Walpole ensured the stability of the Hanoverian dynasty following the instability of Queen Anne's reign. Highlight his role in suppressing Jacobite uprisings, particularly the Atterbury Plot of 1722. Mention how his policies aimed to lessen the appeal of Jacobitism.
Political Manoeuvring and Dominance:
Discuss Walpole's political acumen in navigating the change of monarch from George I to George II, despite initial setbacks. Explain his strategies in maintaining Whig dominance, including patronage and managing Parliament. Mention the lack of a sustained and united opposition against him for much of his tenure.
Economic Policies and Peace:
Explain Walpole's economic policies that appealed to merchants and landowners, such as focusing on trade and keeping land taxes low. Discuss his commitment to peace and its positive impact on the economy and national debt reduction. Highlight how this contributed to national stability and prosperity.
Arguments for Walpole's Decreasing Effectiveness:
Persistence of Jacobitism:
While Walpole effectively quelled early Jacobite threats, explain how the Jacobite cause was not entirely extinguished, as evidenced by the later 1745 rebellion. This demonstrates a failure to fully eliminate the potential for future instability.
Political Opposition and Scandals:
Discuss the growing opposition to Walpole's methods, particularly from figures like William Pulteney. Explain how accusations of corruption and financial scandals, like those between 1725 and 1733, damaged his reputation and fueled dissent. Highlight the significance of the Excise Bill of 1733 as a turning point where opposition to Walpole became more vocal and organized.
Decline in the Later Years:
Analyze the factors that contributed to Walpole's declining grip on power in the 1730s, including the death of Queen Caroline in 1737, the rise of the "Patriot Boys" opposition movement, and the unpopular War of Jenkins' Ear (1739). Explain how these events eroded his political support and ability to effectively govern.
Conclusion:
Provide a balanced conclusion that acknowledges both Walpole's successes and limitations. Argue that while he was undoubtedly effective in the early part of his ministry, his effectiveness waned in later years due to a combination of his own missteps and the emergence of new challenges. Offer a final judgment on his overall effectiveness as principal minister, taking into account the full span of his time in office.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Was Walpole Effective?
Answers that Walpole was effective might consider that he was effective in securing the Hanoverian regime. They might also consider that he was effective in that he survived the change of monarch in 1727, despite George II’s initial preference for Sir Spencer Compton. They might also consider that he was effective in securing the domination of his Whig allies and supporters. They might also consider that he was effective in promoting policies that appealed to those who were powerful in commerce and parliament. They might also consider that he was effective at promoting peace, which also kept taxation low. They might also consider that he was effective at crushing Jacobite conspiracies in 1722 with the defeat of the Atterbury Plot. They might also consider that he was effective in preventing his opponents from forming a lasting front against him. They might also consider that he was effective in winning landed support by reducing land tax. They might also consider that his policies were effective as the national debt was reduced.
Was Walpole Less Effective?
Answers that Walpole was less effective might consider that the Jacobite threat was not destroyed in the long term given the ’45 rebellion. They might also consider that some were angered by not receiving patronage (e.g. William Pulteney). They might also consider the financial and corruption scandals between 1725 and 1733. They might also consider Walpole’s failure over the Excise Bill of 1733. They might also consider that he was less effective at limiting domestic criticism (e.g. The Craftsman). They might also consider that, as the 1730’s progressed, his hold on power began to slip – death of Queen Caroline in 1737, the ‘patriot Boys’ who coalesced around the Prince of Wales, War of Jenkin’s Ear (1739).