‘Opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890.’ Assess the validity of this view.
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2022
Topic
World History
👑Complete Model Essay
‘Opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890.’ Assess the validity of this view.
Opposition in the Reichstag: Assessing its Impact on Bismarck's Policies (1871-1890)
The assertion that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck's policies from 1871 to 1890 warrants careful examination. While Bismarck, as Chancellor, undoubtedly wielded significant power, the Reichstag, as the elected body, was not without influence. This essay will analyze both perspectives, evaluating the extent to which opposition within the Reichstag truly shaped Bismarck's political trajectory during this period.
Arguments Supporting Limited Reichstag Impact
Several factors contribute to the view that Reichstag opposition had minimal effect on Bismarck's agenda. Firstly, Bismarck's initial priority after German unification in 1871 was consolidating the new Reich. Despite facing opposition from groups like the Catholic Centre Party and national minorities, Bismarck successfully navigated these challenges, demonstrating his ability to achieve key objectives even with dissent.
Secondly, Bismarck's introduction of protectionist tariffs in 1878/79, though met with resistance from liberals, showcased his political maneuvering. By forging a new alliance with the Centre Party, he neutralized opposition and advanced his economic vision.
Furthermore, despite lacking consistent majority support in the Reichstag between 1878 and 1887, Bismarck's legislative successes, such as the anti-socialist laws and "state socialism" policies, highlight his capacity to forge majorities when necessary. This suggests an ability to achieve his goals even without unwavering Reichstag backing.
Finally, Bismarck's policies aimed at curtailing the rights and distinct identities of national minorities, despite opposition from their Reichstag representatives, exemplify his willingness to pursue his agenda even when facing direct challenges from specific interest groups.
Arguments Challenging the Notion of Limited Impact
However, dismissing Reichstag opposition entirely would present an incomplete picture. The National Liberals and other parties effectively challenged Bismarck's proposed permanent military budget in 1874, compelling him to accept the Septennial Law. That same year, liberal opposition also led to a diluted Press Law, demonstrating the Reichstag's capacity to force concessions and modify Bismarck's initial proposals.
Moreover, mounting pressure from the Catholic Centre Party and representatives of Catholic minorities ultimately forced Bismarck to abandon the Kulturkampf in 1878, marking a significant policy reversal driven by sustained Reichstag opposition.
The period between 1878 and 1887, following Bismarck's split with the National Liberals, proved particularly challenging as he struggled to maintain stable coalitions. This period saw a slowdown in legislative momentum, indicating the impact of a fragmented Reichstag on Bismarck's ability to govern effectively.
The rise of the SPD presented another challenge. Increasing opposition from this party contributed to both Bismarck's anti-socialist legislation after 1878 and his later adoption of "state socialism." This demonstrates how a growing opposition party could influence the Chancellor's policy choices.
Finally, the Reichstag's ultimate rejection of Bismarck's proposal for a permanent anti-socialist law in 1890, a significant political defeat for the Chancellor, contributed to his resignation that same year. This underscores the potential for Reichstag opposition to culminate in impactful consequences.
Conclusion
While Bismarck undoubtedly dominated German politics, portraying Reichstag opposition as inconsequential would be a simplification. Bismarck possessed a remarkable ability to manage the political landscape, navigating and manipulating different factions to generally achieve his aims. However, the Reichstag, through a combination of political pressure, coalition building, and principled opposition, could at times force compromises, delay legislation, and even instigate policy shifts. The ultimate curtailing of the Kulturkampf and the defeat of the permanent anti-socialist law stand as testaments to this potential. Therefore, while Bismarck's political dexterity enabled him to largely achieve his goals, the Reichstag's influence, though exercised within constraints, should not be underestimated when assessing this period of German history.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Opposition in the Reichstag and Bismarck's Policies, 1871-1890
This essay will assess the validity of the statement that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890. It will consider arguments supporting the view that opposition had limited impact, and those challenging this view, before drawing a conclusion on the extent to which the Reichstag served as a genuine check on Bismarck’s power.
Arguments Supporting Limited Impact
Bismarck’s consolidation of the German Reich (1871-1878): Bismarck prioritized uniting the new German Reich, achieving this successfully despite opposition from various groups including the Centre Party, national minorities, and some Conservatives. This suggests that opposition was not a major obstacle during this crucial period.
Protective Tariffs (1878/79): Bismarck’s introduction of protective tariffs faced resistance from liberals in the Reichstag, but he overcame this by forming an alliance with the Centre Party. This demonstrates Bismarck’s ability to manipulate alliances and secure his objectives.
Anti-Socialist Laws and ‘State Socialism’ (1878-1887): Despite lacking a consistent majority, Bismarck successfully maneuvered the Reichstag to pass both his anti-socialist laws and his “state socialism” policies. This highlights his skill in building and maintaining legislative majorities, even in the absence of a stable coalition.
Minority Rights: Bismarck implemented policies to restrict the rights and identities of national minorities despite opposition from their representatives in the Reichstag. This suggests that he was willing to override opposition in areas he considered crucial to national unity.
Expansion of the Military (1887-1890): Bismarck orchestrated a “Kartel” of parties to support his policy of increased military spending. He also called an early election in 1887 to secure a favorable outcome, demonstrating his control over the legislative process.
Arguments Challenging Limited Impact
Permanent Military Budget (1874): National Liberals and other parties opposed Bismarck’s proposal for a permanent military budget, forcing him to settle for the Septennial Law. This illustrates the Reichstag’s ability to force concessions from Bismarck.
Press Law (1874): Liberal opposition also led to modifications in Bismarck’s proposed Press Law. This demonstrates the Reichstag’s influence in shaping legislation, even if not entirely halting it.
Kulturkampf: The Catholic Centre Party and representatives of Catholic minorities opposed Bismarck’s Kulturkampf, eventually leading to its abandonment in 1878. This exemplifies the Reichstag's capacity to challenge and ultimately force a reversal of Bismarck's policy.
Instability (1878-1887): Following his split with the National Liberals, Bismarck found it difficult to manage the Reichstag. He struggled to form a stable coalition and legislation slowed down, indicating the Reichstag’s ability to hinder the pace of policymaking.
Socialist Opposition: The SPD’s growing opposition contributed to both Bismarck’s anti-socialist legislation and his ‘state socialism’ policies. This demonstrates the Reichstag’s role in shaping Bismarck’s responses to societal challenges, even if indirectly.
Permanent Anti-Socialist Law (1890): Opposition to Bismarck’s permanent anti-socialist law ultimately led to its defeat and contributed to his resignation the same year. This illustrates the Reichstag’s power to defeat crucial policies and even force the resignation of a powerful figure like Bismarck.
Conclusion
While Bismarck was undoubtedly the dominant figure in German politics during this period, the Reichstag was not merely a rubber stamp. Opposition, particularly from the Centre Party and liberals, had significant impact on Bismarck’s policies, forcing him to compromise, delay legislation, and even abandon his initiatives.
Bismarck’s success in navigating the Reichstag was based on his strategic maneuvering, his ability to build alliances, and his control over the electoral process. However, the Reichstag served as a genuine check on his power, and ultimately contributed to his downfall. Therefore, the assertion that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies is an oversimplification, as the Reichstag’s occasional successes in shaping, delaying, and even defeating his policies demonstrate its considerable influence.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Arguments supporting the view that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890
Arguments supporting the view that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890 might include:
⭐Bismarck’s priority, in the years 1871–78, was to consolidate the unity of the new German Reich, which he was able to achieve easily despite opposition from the Catholic Centre Party and national minority groups, as well as unease from some Conservative deputies too.
⭐Bismarck’s decision to introduce protective tariffs in 1878/79 met with strong opposition from liberals within the Reichstag, however, he was able to overcome this opposition fairly easily by engineering a new alignment with the Centre Party over this issue.
⭐Despite not having the consistent support of a majority of Reichstag deputies in the years 1878 to 1887, Bismarck was able to manufacture majorities in favour of both his anti-socialist laws and his policies of ‘state socialism’.
⭐Bismarck pursued a range of policies to restrict the rights and separate identities of the national minorities who now lived within the German Reich, despite opposition from their representatives in the Reichstag.
⭐Between 1887 and 1890, Bismarck was able to manufacture a ‘Kartel’ of parties in support of his policy to increase taxation to fund an expansion of the military. To overcome initial opposition in the Reichstag, he called an early election in 1887, which was won by parties aligned with his patriotic and nationalistic policies.
Arguments challenging the view that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890
Arguments challenging the view that opposition in the Reichstag had little impact on Bismarck’s policies in the years 1871 to 1890 might include:
⭐The National Liberals and other parties opposed Bismarck’s proposal for a permanent settlement of the military budget in 1874, eventually forcing him to agree to the Septennial Law. In the same year, liberal opposition also forced Bismarck to water down his proposed Press Law.
⭐Opposition from the Catholic Centre Party, and from the representatives of Catholic national minorities, eventually forced Bismarck to abandon the Kulturkampf in 1878.
⭐Bismarck found the Reichstag difficult to manage between 1878 and 1887 following his split from the National Liberals. He was never able to engineer a stable coalition of parties in favour of his policies in these years and the pace of legislation slowed.
⭐Increasing opposition from the SPD in the Reichstag contributed to both Bismarck’s anti-socialist legislation after 1878 and his policies of ‘state socialism’ after 1883.
⭐Opposition to Bismarck’s proposal of a permanent anti-socialist law in 1890 resulted in the defeat of his policy, and ultimately contributed to his resignation in the same year.
Overall Conclusion
Overall, students may conclude that Bismarck was clearly the dominant force in German politics of this period. Although he had to secure Reichstag approval for new laws, he was able to achieve this, more often than not, through skilful management of and negotiations with the different parties. At times, the parties were able to come together to force concessions from the chancellor but these tended to be temporary, or relatively minor, victories, which did not detract from Bismarck’s overall political dominance and his ability to enact his policy priorities.