How far do you agree that the main reason for conflict between White and Native Americans in the USA was the gold rush between 1839 and 1860?
Level
GCSE
Year Examined
2021
Topic
American History
👑Complete Model Essay
How far do you agree that the main reason for conflict between White and Native Americans in the USA was the gold rush between 1839 and 1860?
How far do you agree that the main reason for conflict between White and Native Americans in the USA was the gold rush between 1839 and 1860?
Introduction:
The westward expansion of the United States in the 19th century was a period of immense upheaval and conflict, particularly for the Native American tribes who had called the land home for centuries. While the Gold Rush of 1849 dramatically escalated tensions and violence, it was not the sole catalyst for conflict. This essay will argue that while the Gold Rush significantly exacerbated tensions, it was ultimately part of a larger pattern of westward expansion and conflicting ideologies that had been fueling conflict between White Americans and Native Americans for decades.
Gold Rush as a Catalyst for Conflict (Agree)
Paragraph 1: The Gold Rush and Increased Migration:
The discovery of gold in California in 1848 ignited a mass migration westward, with hundreds of thousands of prospectors and settlers flooding into Native American territories. This sudden influx had a devastating impact on the environment and indigenous communities. Mining operations polluted rivers and streams, while the burgeoning settler population placed immense pressure on resources like timber, water, and hunting grounds. This encroachment directly led to conflicts over resources. A tragic example of this is the California Indian Catastrophe, where violence, disease, and displacement caused the Native American population in California to plummet from an estimated 150,000 in 1848 to just 30,000 by 1870.
Paragraph 2: Broken Treaties and Government Actions:
The US government, often swayed by the economic potential of westward expansion, frequently violated treaties made with Native American tribes in order to open up land for mining and settlement. The Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851), for example, promised certain territories to the Lakota Sioux, yet these lands were quickly overrun by gold seekers when gold was discovered. These broken promises, coupled with the government's failure to protect Native American rights, fueled intense resentment and sparked armed resistance from tribes seeking to protect their land and way of life.
Beyond the Gold Rush: Deeper Roots of Conflict (Disagree)
Paragraph 3: Manifest Destiny and Westward Expansion:
The Gold Rush did not occur in a vacuum. It unfolded against the backdrop of Manifest Destiny, a prevalent belief among White Americans that the expansion of the United States across North America was both justified and inevitable. This ideology, rooted in notions of white supremacy and a perceived right to claim and civilize the land, fueled westward expansion well before the discovery of gold. The Indian Removal Act of 1830, which led to the forced displacement of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands in the Southeast (known as the Trail of Tears), stands as a stark example of how conflict stemmed from this ideology long before the Gold Rush.
Paragraph 4: Cultural and Economic Differences:
Fundamental differences in cultural values and practices between White settlers and Native Americans created a constant source of tension. The concept of land ownership was a key point of contention. Native American tribes generally viewed land as a shared resource vital for sustenance and cultural practices, while White settlers embraced private land ownership and sought to exploit the land for individual profit. These differing perspectives on land use, along with contrasting views on resource management and social structures, led to misunderstandings and conflict that transcended the immediate impacts of the Gold Rush.
Conclusion:
While the Gold Rush significantly intensified conflict between White Americans and Native Americans, it was not the sole or even primary driver. The Gold Rush should be seen as a particularly violent and destructive chapter within a much longer and more complex history of conflict. The roots of this conflict lay in the expansionist ideology of Manifest Destiny, the drive for land and resources, and the fundamental cultural and economic differences between the two groups. The Gold Rush magnified these existing tensions, leading to widespread violence, displacement, and the further erosion of Native American rights and way of life.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
How far do you agree that the main reason for conflict between White and Native Americans in the USA was the gold rush between 1839 and 1860?
Introduction:
Briefly outline the historical context: westward expansion, the desire for land, and the existing tensions between White Americans and Native American tribes. State your line of argument - e.g., While the Gold Rush significantly escalated conflicts, it was not the sole or even primary driver.
Gold Rush as a Catalyst for Conflict (Agree)
Paragraph 1: The Gold Rush and Increased Migration:
Explain how the discovery of gold in California (1848) led to a massive influx of prospectors and settlers. Detail the environmental impact and how this encroachment directly led to conflicts over resources (land, hunting grounds, water) with Native Americans.
Example: The California Indian Catastrophe - Provide specific examples of violence and displacement caused by the gold rush.
Paragraph 2: Broken Treaties and Government Actions:
Explain how the US government, influenced by the desire for wealth and expansion, often broke treaties with Native American tribes to open up land for mining and settlement.
Example: The Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) and its subsequent violations. Explain how these actions fueled resentment and resistance among Native Americans, leading to further conflict.
Beyond the Gold Rush: Deeper Roots of Conflict (Disagree)
Paragraph 3: Manifest Destiny and Westward Expansion:
Discuss the concept of Manifest Destiny and how it fueled the belief among White Americans in their right to expand westward, regardless of Native American claims to the land. Explain how this ideology predated the Gold Rush and was a driving force behind earlier conflicts and removals.
Example: The Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the Trail of Tears as evidence of pre-existing tensions.
Paragraph 4: Cultural and Economic Differences:
Analyze the fundamental differences in land ownership views, resource usage, and cultural practices between White settlers and Native Americans. Explain how these differences created a persistent source of misunderstanding and conflict, independent of the Gold Rush.
Example: Contrasting views on communal vs. private land ownership.
Conclusion:
Summarize the key arguments presented. Re-state your overall judgment, acknowledging the complexity of the issue.
Example: Conclude that while the Gold Rush significantly exacerbated tensions and led to increased violence, it was ultimately part of a larger pattern of westward expansion and conflicting ideologies that had been fueling conflict between White Americans and Native Americans for decades.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
It is possible to reach the highest marks either by agreeing or disagreeing or anywhere between, providing the response matches the level description.
BUT, to achieve the two highest levels, answers must consider some of the grounds for arguing the opposite point of view to the one that they finally support.