top of page

To what extent was the establishment of Outremer by 1131 due to failures within the Islamic World from 1099?

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2020

Topic

The First Crusade and the Establishment of Outremer

👑Complete Model Essay

To what extent was the establishment of Outremer by 1131 due to failures within the Islamic World from 1099?

To what extent was the establishment of Outremer by 1131 due to failures within the Islamic World from 1099?

The establishment of Outremer, the Crusader States in the Levant, by 1131 was undoubtedly a complex process with multiple contributing factors. While the First Crusade (1095-1099) saw the successful capture of Jerusalem by European forces, the subsequent decades were marked by both Frankish struggles and opportunities provided by divisions within the Islamic world. This essay will argue that while the establishment of Outremer was significantly aided by failures and divisions within the Islamic world, attributing it solely to these factors would be a simplification. This essay will explore the internal weaknesses of the Islamic world, the strategic blunders of Muslim rulers, and the role of Frankish resilience and adaptability in establishing a foothold in the Levant.

Internal Divisions and Weaknesses

It is undeniable that the Islamic world in the late 11th and early 12th centuries was beset by internal divisions that significantly aided the Frankish conquest and consolidation of power. The Seljuk Empire, nominally united under the Sultan in Baghdad, was in reality fractured into competing emirates. This disunity meant that a coordinated response to the Crusader threat was absent, allowing the relatively small Crusader armies to exploit these divisions and secure victories. The decision by emirs in Syria to tolerate, and even at times ally with, Frankish neighbors against their rivals exemplifies this fragmentation. These alliances highlight the internal power struggles that took precedence over a united Islamic front against the Crusader presence.

Furthermore, the focus of key Muslim rulers on internal threats rather than the Frankish presence in the Levant further exacerbated the situation. The Sultan in Baghdad, preoccupied with securing his own position in Iraq and dealing with challenges to his authority, viewed the Franks as a distant problem. This lack of a centralized, concerted response from the heart of the Islamic world allowed the Crusader States to consolidate their gains and establish a firm foothold in the region. The failure of relief forces sent from Cairo after the fall of Jerusalem further exemplifies the lack of effective coordination and the inability to dislodge the Franks.

Beyond Internal Divisions: Frankish Agency and Adaptability
However, attributing the success of Outremer solely to failures within the Islamic world risks overlooking the role of Frankish agency and adaptability. The Crusaders, though arriving from a fragmented Europe, displayed a remarkable ability to adapt to the unfamiliar environment of the Levant. They established a feudal system, built castles, and forged alliances with local Christian rulers, all of which contributed to their long-term survival. The Crusader States were not merely a byproduct of Islamic weakness; they were forged by Frankish determination and strategic acumen.

Moreover, the idea of a unified Islamic response to the Crusades should be treated with caution. The concept of jihad, while present in Islamic thought, was only beginning to be articulated as a direct response to the Franks in the period following 1099. While a few scholars began to write about the importance of jihad, it had not yet galvanised the widespread popular support it would in later periods. This nascent sense of pan-Islamic unity against the Crusader kingdoms was not strong enough to overcome the immediate political realities of the time, namely the internal rivalries and power struggles that plagued the Muslim world.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the establishment of Outremer by 1131 was significantly aided by failures and divisions within the Islamic world. The lack of a unified response, the internal power struggles, and the preoccupation of key Muslim rulers with threats other than the Franks created the space for the Crusader States to take root and flourish. However, to view this solely as a consequence of Islamic failure ignores the crucial element of Frankish agency. The Crusaders were not passive beneficiaries of Islamic weakness; they were active agents in their own right, displaying adaptability, military acumen, and a pragmatic approach to diplomacy that allowed them to establish a lasting presence in the Levant. While divisions within the Islamic world provided the opportunity, it was ultimately the Franks who seized it, shaping the political landscape of the Levant for nearly two centuries.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

To What Extent Was the Establishment of Outremer by 1131 Due to Failures Within the Islamic World from 1099?

This essay will explore the extent to which the establishment of Outremer, the Crusader states in the Levant, by 1131 was a result of failures within the Islamic world from 1099. It will argue that while internal divisions and weaknesses within the Islamic world undoubtedly contributed to the success of the Crusaders, other factors, such as the Crusader's own military prowess and political acumen, played a significant role.

Internal Divisions and Weaknesses

Firstly, the Islamic world was indeed plagued by internal divisions and weaknesses in the period following the First Crusade. The Seljuk Empire, which had once been a powerful force in the region, was fractured by internal power struggles, leaving the different Seljuk emirs and other rulers fiercely divided. This lack of unity made it difficult for them to mount a cohesive response to the Crusader threat. For example, the Sultan in Baghdad was largely concerned with his own position in Iraq and offered little support to the Syrian emirs facing the Crusaders. This lack of central authority allowed the Crusaders to consolidate their gains and establish their own states in the Levant.

Secondly, the response of the Egyptian Fatimid Caliphate, the main military power in the region, was also inadequate. After the capture of Jerusalem in 1099, the relief forces sent from Cairo were mostly defeated. This failure to decisively repel the Crusaders was a major setback that allowed them to establish a foothold in the region. This suggests that the weakness of the Fatimids, who were in a state of decline, played a key role in the Crusader’s success.

Crusader Strengths

However, it is crucial to note that the Crusaders also possessed considerable strengths that contributed to their initial success. Their military prowess, honed through years of fighting in Europe, was a significant advantage. They were well-equipped and had a strong martial tradition.

Furthermore, the Crusaders were driven by a strong religious zeal and a desire to liberate the Holy Land from Islamic control. This religious fervor gave them a psychological edge over their opponents and motivated them to fight with great tenacity.

Finally, the Crusaders demonstrated a remarkable level of political acumen in establishing their states. They were adept at forging alliances with local populations and making concessions to secure their positions. This enabled them to create a network of Crusader states, each with its own complex political structure and military power.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the establishment of Outremer by 1131 was a result of a complex interplay of factors. While the internal divisions and weaknesses within the Islamic world undoubtedly contributed to the Crusader’s initial success, it was not the sole factor. The Crusaders’ own strength, their military prowess, and political acumen played a significant role in their success. The Crusader states were not simply established by default; they were forged through a combination of military might, political maneuvering, and religious zeal. It is important to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of this complex historical episode rather than attributing it solely to the failures of the Islamic world.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

The Aftermath of Jerusalem's Capture
After the capture of Jerusalem, relief forces sent by Cairo were mostly defeated.
The Sultan in Baghdad was largely concerned with his own position in Iraq.
The Seljuk emirs and other rulers were fiercely divided.
A few scholars began to write about jihad.
The emirs of Syria preferred to have Frankish neighbours than increased interference from the Caliph in Baghdad.

bottom of page