To What Extent Did Japanese Plans for a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere Explain the Attack on Pearl Harbor?

The attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, was a pivotal moment in World War II, marking the entry of the United States into the conflict. While the Japanese ambition for a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere (GEACPS) played a significant role in the decision to attack, it was not the sole driving force. Other crucial factors, including long-standing resentment towards the US, economic sanctions, and strategic considerations, combined to make war seem like the only viable option for Japan.

The Allure of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere

The GEACPS represented Japan's vision for an Asia free from Western imperialism, dominated instead by Japan. This ambition stemmed from Japan's rapid modernization and militarization in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which fueled its imperial ambitions. Japan sought raw materials and markets for its growing industrial output, and the resource-rich territories of Southeast Asia, under European colonial control, presented an attractive target. The GEACPS promised self-sufficiency and economic dominance for Japan while ostensibly liberating Asian nations from Western control.

However, this vision directly clashed with American interests in the region. The US had significant economic and strategic stakes in the Philippines and China, viewing Japanese expansion as a threat. The presence of the powerful US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii presented a formidable obstacle to Japan's plans. Neutralizing this fleet, the Japanese military leadership believed, was essential for achieving their goals in Southeast Asia and securing their planned sphere of influence. The attack on Pearl Harbor, therefore, was partly intended to cripple the US Pacific Fleet and buy Japan time to consolidate its gains before the US could effectively respond.

Beyond Economic Ambitions

While the economic and strategic objectives tied to the GEACPS were significant, they do not fully explain the decision to attack Pearl Harbor. Long-simmering tensions between Japan and the US played a crucial role. Japan resented US policies like the Immigration Act of 1924, which barred Japanese immigration, perceiving it as racially motivated discrimination. Further exacerbating the situation was American support for the Chinese Nationalist government during the Second Sino-Japanese War, which Japan saw as direct interference in its sphere of influence.

Economic sanctions imposed by the US in 1939-40, including an embargo on crucial war materials like oil and steel, added fuel to the fire. These sanctions crippled the Japanese war machine, reliant on American resources. The US demanded Japan withdraw from China and Indochina as a precondition for lifting the embargo, demands the Japanese leadership viewed as an unacceptable infringement on their autonomy and ambitions.

The Path to War

By late 1941, Japan found itself at a crossroads. The war in Europe had left the US as the sole major power capable of thwarting Japanese ambitions in Asia. The perceived humiliation of American sanctions, coupled with a sense of vulnerability stemming from their dependence on US resources, fostered a belief among Japanese leaders that war was inevitable. The attack on Pearl Harbor was, therefore, a calculated gamble. By striking first and decisively, Japan aimed to cripple the US Pacific Fleet, paving the way for the rapid conquest of Southeast Asia and establishing a strong enough position to negotiate a favorable peace settlement.

Conclusion

The Japanese desire for a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere undoubtedly played a crucial role in the decision to attack Pearl Harbor. The economic and strategic imperatives of securing resources, markets, and a dominant position in Asia were central to Japanese planning. However, reducing the attack solely to economic ambitions overlooks the complex interplay of factors involved. Decades of resentment towards the US, discriminatory immigration policies, support for China, and crippling economic sanctions created a climate of hostility and mistrust that made war seem like the only viable option for a Japanese leadership determined to secure its vision of Asia's future.

Bibliography
Barnhart, M. A. *Japan Prepares for Total War: The Search for Economic Security, 1919-1941*. Stanford University Press, 1987.
<br>
Dower, John W. *War Without Mercy: Race & Power in the Pacific War*. Pantheon Books, 1986.
<br>
Iriye, Akira. *The Origins of the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific*. Longman, 1987.