top of page

How important was Israeli aggression as a cause of conflict, 1956–73?

Level

O LEVEL

Year Examined

2019

Topic

ISRAELIS AND PALESTINIANS SINCE 1945

👑Complete Model Essay

How important was Israeli aggression as a cause of conflict, 1956–73?

How important was Israeli aggression as a cause of conflict, 1956–73?

The role of Israeli aggression in causing the conflicts of 1956-73 is a complex and debated issue. While Israel certainly took aggressive military action during this period, arguing this was the sole or even primary driver of conflict requires a deeper examination of the historical context and other contributing factors.

Arguments for Israeli Aggression as a Key Cause

There is no doubt that Israel played a significant role in escalating tensions. The 1956 Suez Crisis, for example, saw Israel launch a pre-planned invasion of the Sinai Peninsula in collusion with Britain and France. This action, while presented as a response to Egypt's nationalization of the Suez Canal, can be interpreted as an attempt to expand Israeli territory and weaken Egypt strategically.

Similarly, the Six-Day War of 1967 was triggered by an Israeli pre-emptive strike against Egypt. This attack, while prompted by Egyptian military maneuvers and the closure of the Straits of Tiran, demonstrated Israel's willingness to use its military might to achieve its objectives. The swift and decisive victory in this war, which resulted in Israel seizing the West Bank, Golan Heights, Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula, further cemented its image as a regional military power unafraid to use force.

Israel's continuous rearmament and modernization of its military, aided by significant support from the United States, France, and other Western powers, is also cited as evidence of its aggressive posture. This build-up, coupled with its military actions, contributed to a climate of fear and mistrust among its Arab neighbors.

Counterarguments and Alternative Explanations

However, focusing solely on Israeli aggression risks overlooking crucial contextual factors and other key players in these conflicts.

Firstly, the role of Britain and France in the 1956 Suez Crisis cannot be ignored. Their colonial interests in the region and their anger at Nasser's nationalization of the Suez Canal were significant driving forces behind the conflict. Israel's involvement, while aggressive, can be seen as part of a larger geopolitical struggle.

Secondly, Gamal Abdel Nasser's leadership in Egypt played a crucial role in shaping the regional dynamics. His pan-Arabism and determination to challenge Western influence, epitomized by the Suez Crisis, fostered a climate of confrontation. The creation of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1964 and the subsequent cross-border raids into Israel added another layer of complexity to the conflict, further fueling tensions.

Furthermore, the 1973 Yom Kippur War challenges the narrative of singular Israeli aggression. In this case, it was Egypt, under Anwar Sadat, that launched a surprise attack across the Suez Canal, aiming to recapture territory lost in 1967. While Israel ultimately repelled the attack, the war demonstrated that other actors were willing to initiate military action and challenge the status quo.

Finally, reducing the conflict solely to Israeli action ignores the broader regional context. The rise of Arab nationalism, fueled by figures like Nasser, and the emergence of groups like the Ba'ath Party in Syria, contributed to a climate of anti-Israeli sentiment and a desire to reclaim lost Palestinian land. Cold War rivalries and superpower involvement further complicated the situation, adding external pressures to the already volatile mix.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Israeli aggression, evident in its military actions in 1956 and 1967, played a role in the Arab-Israeli conflicts, portraying it as the sole or primary cause presents an incomplete picture. The complex interplay of regional power struggles, Cold War politics, the quest for Palestinian self-determination, and the ambitions of leaders like Nasser, all contributed significantly to the volatile environment. Attributing blame solely to one party ignores the multifaceted nature of this enduring conflict.

Sources:

⭐Prittie, T. E., "Eshkol of Israel: The Man and the Nation"
⭐Heikal, M. H., "The Road to Ramadan"
⭐Rabinovich, I., "The Yom Kippur War: The Epic Encounter That Transformed the Middle East"

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Outline

I. Importance of Israeli Aggression as a Cause of Conflict

- Israeli aggression was a significant factor in escalating tensions and provoking conflicts.
- In 1956, Israel's invasion of Egypt across Sinai demonstrated its aggressive intent.
- Israel's pre-emptive strike in the 1967 Six Day War further heightened tensions and led to full-scale war.

II. Alternative Perspectives and Causes

- While Israeli aggression was a contributing factor, it was not the sole cause of conflict.
- British and French involvement in the 1956 Suez Crisis played a significant role in fueling tensions.
- Nasser's pan-Arabist policies and creation of the PLO created an environment of hostility towards Israel.
- PLO raids into Israel and superpower involvement further exacerbated conflict.
- Sadat's surprise attack in 1973 demonstrated that Arab states were also capable of aggression.
- Syrian and Arab nationalism contributed to tensions and conflict.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

How important was Israeli aggression as a cause of conflict, 1956–73? Explain your answer.

YES
- An armed Israel took advantage of the situation in 1956;
- Secret plan to invade Egypt across Sinai to claim land;
- Paratroopers used; continued to rearm and modernize thanks to US, French, and British help;
- Israeli pre-emptive strike against Egypt in 1967 Six Day War;
- Israeli air force gained air superiority, etc.

NO
- More important – roles of Britain and France in 1956;
- Nasser in 1956 and 1967; creation of PLO;
- PLO raids into Israel; superpower involvement;
- 1973 – Sadat’s surprise attack across the Suez Canal;
- Syria and Baath Party; Arab nationalism, etc.

bottom of page