To what extent was the decline of Spanish power the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution in the years 1667 to 1668?
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2020
Topic
War of Devolution
👑Complete Model Essay
To what extent was the decline of Spanish power the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution in the years 1667 to 1668?
To what extent was the decline of Spanish power the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution in the years 1667 to 1668?
The War of Devolution (1667-1668), a relatively short but significant conflict between France and Spain, provides an intriguing case study for analyzing the factors behind French military success in the late seventeenth century. While the decline of Spanish power undoubtedly played a crucial role, arguing that it was the sole reason for France's victory would be an oversimplification. This essay will explore the multifaceted nature of the conflict, considering both the undeniable weaknesses of Spain and the concurrent rise of French military and diplomatic strength under Louis XIV.
The Declining Spanish Colossus
Spain, once the dominant power in Europe, entered the latter half of the seventeenth century a shadow of its former self. The demographic reality painted a stark picture: while Spain’s population in 1600 was two-fifths that of France, by 1665 it had dwindled to a mere third. This decline had profound implications for Spain's ability to raise and maintain a powerful army, a critical factor in the War of Devolution.
Furthermore, the once mighty Spanish economy lay in ruins. By 1660, the influx of bullion from South America, which had fueled Spain’s imperial ambitions in the sixteenth century, had plummeted by a staggering 75%. This financial hemorrhage left Spain drowning in a sea of debt, a staggering 221 million ducats by 1667. The Spanish treasury effectively declared bankruptcy in 1666, crippling the nation's ability to finance its war effort.
Adding to Spain’s woes was its increasingly fragile political landscape. Philip IV, plagued by declining health, died in 1665, leaving the throne to his three-year-old son, Charles II. The ensuing regency, a period often fraught with instability, faced internal challenges from ambitious family members and a full-blown rebellion in Portugal. These internal conflicts further drained Spanish resources and diverted attention away from the French threat.
The Rise of French Fortunes
While Spain grappled with its internal demons, France, under the ambitious Louis XIV, was experiencing a period of remarkable ascendency. The French army, a key instrument of Louis's foreign policy, underwent a significant transformation. From a force of 72,000 in 1661, it swelled to 134,000 by 1667, a testament to France’s growing manpower and resources. Although some of the reforms implemented by Le Tellier, Louis XIV's Secretary of State for War, were still in their early stages, the increased size and improved pay of the French army provided a clear advantage over their Spanish counterparts.
The driving force behind France's military expansion was a revitalized economy, largely attributed to the reforms of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis XIV's Controller-General of Finances. Colbert's mercantilist policies, aimed at achieving national self-sufficiency and maximizing exports, bolstered the French treasury and provided the financial sinews necessary to sustain a prolonged conflict.
French success in the War of Devolution was not limited to the battlefield. The diplomatic maneuvering of Louis XIV's foreign minister, Hugues de Lionne, proved equally instrumental. Lionne expertly exploited Spain’s weakened state by isolating it diplomatically. He successfully secured a non-intervention agreement with Spain's fellow Habsburgs, a critical blow to any hopes Spain had of external assistance. Furthermore, Lionne fueled the flames of the Portuguese rebellion by providing the rebels with an annual subsidy of 2 million livres, further stretching Spain's already thin resources.
On the battlefields of Flanders, French military prowess was equally evident. The rehabilitation of Louis II de Condé, Prince de Condé, a brilliant military commander, and the strategic acumen of Henri de la Tour d'Auvergne, Viscount de Turenne, another highly skilled general, proved decisive. Condé’s swift conquest of Franche-Comté and Turenne’s successful campaigns in the Spanish Netherlands showcased the effectiveness of the French army and its leadership.
Geographic factors also tipped the scales in France’s favor. France's contiguous territory and direct border with the Spanish Netherlands facilitated the rapid movement of troops and supplies. In contrast, Spain's scattered territories and the logistical challenges posed by the Pyrenees hampered its ability to respond effectively to French aggression.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the decline of Spanish power, evidenced by its demographic crisis, economic woes, and internal political turmoil, undoubtedly contributed to its defeat in the War of Devolution, attributing French success solely to this factor would be a misjudgment. The war also unveiled the burgeoning strength of France under Louis XIV. The combination of a revitalized army, a flourishing economy, astute diplomacy, and skilled military leadership allowed France to exploit Spanish weakness and secure a decisive victory. The War of Devolution marked a turning point in the balance of power in Europe, signaling the decline of Spain and the rise of France as the continent's dominant force.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
To what extent was the decline of Spanish power the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution in the years 1667 to 1668?
This essay will argue that whilst Spain’s decline was a significant factor in France’s success in the War of Devolution, it was not the sole reason. Other factors, such as the rise of the French army, the strength of the French economy and the effectiveness of French diplomacy, also played a crucial role in the outcome of the war.
Arguments suggesting that the decline of Spanish power was the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution:
Spain’s decline was a significant factor:
• Spain’s population was significantly smaller than France's.
• Its economy and financial resources were weakening, with a decline in bullion from South America.
• It was burdened by huge debts from previous wars against France.
• Spain was politically unstable, with a young and inexperienced heir to the throne.
Arguments challenging the view that the decline of Spanish power was the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution:
Other factors played a significant role:
• The French army had undergone significant reforms and was larger and better paid than the Spanish army.
• France’s economic strength, due to Colbert’s reforms, allowed it to fund the war effectively.
• French diplomacy, under Lionne, successfully isolated Spain and secured the neutrality of other European powers.
• French military skill, demonstrated by Condé and Turenne, was crucial in achieving victory.
• Geographic factors also favoured France, giving it easier access to the Spanish Netherlands.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the decline of Spanish power was a significant factor in France’s success in the War of Devolution, it was not the sole reason. Other factors, such as the strength of the French army, the effectiveness of French diplomacy, and the advantages offered by geography, also contributed to the French victory.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Arguments suggesting that the decline of Spanish power was the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution:
• Spain’s population decline – it was two fifths of France’s size in 1600 but only a third in 1665
• Spain’s economic and financial resources were declining – for example bullion from South America had fallen by 75% by 1660 from sixteenth century levels
• Spain had huge debts from the extended wars against France – 221 million ducats in 1667. It was bankrupt in 1666
• Spain’s political weakness; Phillip IV had declining health and died in 1665 and left a long regency with a three-year old heir who faced challenges to the throne from family members and rebellion in Portugal which only ended in 1668.
Arguments challenging the view that the decline of Spanish power was the reason for France’s success in the War of Devolution:
• The rise of the French army from 72 000 in 1661 to 134 000 in 1667; while the soldiers were also better paid, many of the army reforms of Le Tellier had not time to bed in
• France’s economic strength due to Colbert’s reforms meant that they were well-placed to fund a war
• Spain lacked allies due to the diplomacy of Lionne who also gave the Portuguese rebels an annual subsidy of 2 million livres. The non-intervention of Spain’s fellow Habsburgs was a crucial factor, again due to Lionne’s diplomacy
• French military skill with the rehabilitation of Condé who rapidly conquered Franche Comté and Turenne in the Spanish Netherlands
• Geographic factors favoured France; France for example had a direct border with the Spanish Netherlands whereas Spain found it difficult to move its troops about its scattered territories.