To what extent did Russian military defeats in the First World War cause the Revolution of February 1917?
Level
AS LEVEL
Year Examined
2021
Topic
The Russian Revolution, 1894–1921
👑Complete Model Essay
To what extent did Russian military defeats in the First World War cause the Revolution of February 1917?
To what extent did Russian military defeats in the First World War cause the Revolution of February 1917?
The February Revolution of 1917, which led to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of the Romanov dynasty, was a pivotal moment in Russian history. While military defeats in World War I undoubtedly played a significant role in creating the conditions for revolution, it is crucial to recognize that they were not the sole cause. A complex interplay of long-term social, political, and economic factors, exacerbated by the war's strain on Russian society, ultimately culminated in the February upheaval.
Military Defeats and Eroding Morale
Russia entered World War I with a wave of patriotic fervor, but the initial enthusiasm quickly waned as the realities of modern warfare set in. A series of devastating military defeats, starting with the Battle of Tannenberg in 1914, exposed the Russian army's weaknesses and shattered public confidence in the Tsarist regime. The expulsion of Russian forces from Poland by mid-1915, the failed Lake Naroch offensive in 1916, and the eventual stalling of the Brusilov Offensive further eroded morale. These losses not only highlighted the incompetence of the military leadership but also fueled widespread discontent with the Tsar.
Nicholas II's decision in 1915 to assume personal command of the army proved to be a grave miscalculation. While intended to bolster morale, it instead made him directly accountable for the military's failings. Every defeat was now seen as a personal failure of the Tsar, further tarnishing his image and undermining his authority. As historian Orlando Figes argues, "By taking personal command of the army, Nicholas II had made himself a hostage to fortune." (Figes, A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924, 1996, p. 325)
Deeper Underlying Issues
However, it is essential to acknowledge the pre-existing tensions that the war exacerbated. Russia's political system, characterized by autocratic rule and a lack of meaningful representation, was ill-equipped to handle the stresses of a modern war. Nicholas II's resistance to political reform, despite growing calls for change, created a dangerous disconnect between the Tsar and his people. The lack of a shared responsibility for key decisions meant that blame for the war's failures fell squarely on the shoulders of the Tsar and his government.
Moreover, the war's impact on the Russian economy cannot be overlooked. The enormous strain of mobilizing for war exposed the weaknesses of Russia's underdeveloped industrial base. Shortages of food and essential goods became rampant, leading to skyrocketing inflation and widespread hardship, particularly in urban centers. The government's inability to address these economic woes, coupled with accusations of corruption and inefficiency, further fueled popular discontent and created a volatile environment ripe for revolution.
The Catalyst of February 1917
The February Revolution was not a spontaneous uprising but rather the culmination of years of simmering resentment and frustration that finally boiled over. While military defeats played a crucial role in eroding the Tsar's authority and exacerbating existing tensions, it was ultimately the confluence of these factors - military setbacks, economic hardship, and political repression - that led to the regime's downfall. The immediate trigger for the revolution, the bread riots in Petrograd, were a direct result of the war's impact on the civilian population. As historian Richard Pipes notes, "The February Revolution was a spontaneous outburst of popular discontent, triggered by economic hardship and the war." (Pipes, The Russian Revolution, 1990, p. 364)
Conclusion
In conclusion, while military defeats in World War I were a significant contributing factor to the February Revolution, they should not be viewed in isolation. The war acted as a catalyst, exposing and exacerbating existing social, economic, and political tensions that had been brewing for decades. The Tsar's failure to address these underlying issues, coupled with his inability to mitigate the devastating impact of the war on Russian society, ultimately led to his downfall. The February Revolution was not solely a consequence of military defeat; it was the culmination of long-term structural problems brought to a head by the unprecedented strain of total war.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the topic of the essay – the February Revolution and its causes. State your line of argument – while military defeats played a role, ultimately, other factors were more significant in causing the revolution.
Military Defeats and their Impact
Acknowledge the argument that military defeats contributed to the revolution. Provide examples of significant defeats: Tannenberg, expulsion from Poland, Lake Naroch, stalled Brusilov Offensive. Explain how these defeats led to:
⭐Declining morale among soldiers and civilians.
⭐Criticism of the Tsar's leadership due to his personal command since 1915.
⭐Generals ultimately persuading the Tsar to abdicate.
Limitations of the Military Defeat Argument
Transition into challenging the sole importance of military defeats. Highlight other crucial factors:
⭐Lack of Political Reform: Nicholas II's resistance to meaningful constitutional reform meant no shared responsibility for decisions, intensifying criticism towards him.
⭐Tsarina and Rasputin: Tsar's decision to lead the army left the unpopular Tsarina in charge, fueling rumors of treason due to her German heritage. Her association with Rasputin further damaged the monarchy's image.
Government Incompetence and Economic Hardship
Emphasize the role of government mismanagement and its impact on the home front:
⭐Logistical Failures: Inefficient supply lines led to shortages of food and supplies for both the army and civilians.
⭐Food Shortages and Inflation: Wartime mobilization caused labor shortages in agriculture, leading to food shortages and inflation in urban centers, exacerbating existing social tensions.
The February Revolution
Connect the previous arguments to the outbreak of the revolution:
⭐ Explain how rumors of further bread rationing in Petrograd, fueled by existing discontent and hardship, were the immediate trigger of the February Revolution.
⭐ While military defeats played a part in creating a climate of discontent, ultimately it was the culmination of long-term political and economic grievances that sparked the revolution.
Conclusion
Reiterate your argument: While military defeats contributed to the instability of the Tsarist regime, it was the combination of autocratic rule, government incompetence, economic hardship, and the strain of war that ultimately led to the February Revolution of 1917.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
To what extent did Russian military defeats in the First World War cause the Revolution of February 1917?
Arguments to support the view could be as follows.
In 1914, there was overwhelming support for the war but the, seeming, continuous series of military setbacks such as Tannenberg in 1914, the expulsion of Russian forces from Poland by mid-1915, the failure of the Lake Naroch offensive in 1916, and the slowing down, after early gains, of the Brusilov offensive caused Russian morale to fall. This helped to foster a desire for change. The fact that since 1915 the Tsar had taken personal command at the front meant the responsibility for military setbacks lay, ultimately, with Nicholas II. This led many amongst both the military and the civilian population to feel that the Tsar should no longer head the government. The fact that it was the generals who persuaded the Tsar to abdicate suggests that military defeats caused the revolution of February 1917.
This viewpoint, however, can be challenged. The lack of any meaningful constitutional reforms by Nicholas II meant that there was no shared responsibility for key decisions which had led to military defeat. A shared responsibility would have lessened criticism of the Tsar. The Tsar’s decision to personally lead the army at the front was a great mistake. The Tsarina was left in charge, but her German background led to rumors of her being a German spy and the relationship with Rasputin, popularly regarded as inappropriate, tarnished the Romanov’s reputation. All this further undermined the allure of monarchy by February 1917. The incompetence of the government further created a desire for change. Supplies needed for the troops rotted in marshalling yards because there were not enough engines available to transport them to the front. Food shortages were created by the lack of men to bring in the harvests as they were dead, wounded, prisoners of war, or at the front. The priority given to the transport of troops and equipment over that of food to urban areas created more discontent with the regime. Indeed, it was rumors of a further cut in bread supplies in February 1917 that led to strikes and demonstrations in Petrograd, demanding food and an end to the war. This was the start of the February Revolution which led to the Tsar’s abdication on 2nd. March 1917. Accept any other valid responses.