How far was Britain’s appeasement policy towards Germany caused by fear of another war?
Level
AS Level
Year Examined
2023
Topic
The League of Nations and international relations in the 1930s
👑Complete Model Essay
How far was Britain’s appeasement policy towards Germany caused by fear of another war?
Appeasement and the Fear of War
Appeasement, the policy of making concessions to an aggressor to avoid conflict, was a defining feature of British foreign policy towards Germany in the 1930s. While various factors contributed to this approach, the fear of another devastating war undoubtedly played a significant role.
The trauma of the First World War (1914-1918) cast a long shadow over British society. The unprecedented carnage and loss of life left an enduring aversion to war. The memory of the conflict, often referred to as the "Great War," was kept alive through memorials, literature, and personal accounts. The 1933 Oxford Union debate, where students voted overwhelmingly against fighting for "King and Country," exemplified the widespread pacifist sentiment among the younger generation. Similarly, the Peace Ballot of 1935, a nationwide survey, revealed that a significant majority of the British public supported disarmament and opposed military action.
Beyond the psychological scars of the Great War, Britain in the 1930s faced significant economic challenges. The Great Depression had a devastating impact on the country, leading to mass unemployment and social unrest. Re-armament and engaging in another costly war seemed economically unfeasible and politically unpopular. The government's focus on domestic recovery and its limited resources further fueled the desire to avoid international conflict.
The widespread belief that the Treaty of Versailles, which formally ended World War I, had been overly harsh on Germany also contributed to appeasement. Many Britons felt that Germany had legitimate grievances, particularly regarding territorial losses and restrictions on its military. There was a sense that Hitler's demands for revisions to the treaty were justified and that accommodating these demands would prevent further conflict. This view was often accompanied by admiration for Hitler's leadership in restoring Germany's economy and international standing.
Furthermore, the rise of Communism in the Soviet Union presented a perceived threat that overshadowed the dangers of a resurgent Germany. Communism was seen as a dangerous and revolutionary ideology that threatened the established order in Europe. In this context, some policymakers saw a rearmed and strengthened Germany as a potential bulwark against Soviet expansionism. This fear of Communism, combined with a belief that Germany could be a valuable ally against the Soviet Union, further encouraged appeasement.
Conclusion
While the fear of another war was a significant factor in shaping British appeasement, it was not the sole cause. The trauma of World War I, the economic constraints of the Great Depression, perceptions of the Treaty of Versailles's unfairness, and the perceived threat of Communism all intertwined to create a complex set of circumstances that led to the policy of appeasement. However, the deep-seated fear of another devastating conflict, fueled by the vivid memories of the Great War, played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing government policy. The desire for peace, however misguided, ultimately outweighed the potential dangers of appeasing Hitler's ambitions, contributing to the outbreak of World War II.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the topic of appeasement and Britain's motivations. State your main argument - whether fear of another war was the most significant factor or not.
Fear of Another War
Evidence: Vivid memories of World War I, pacifist movements, public opinion polls (Oxford Debate, Peace Ballot).
Analysis: Explain how this fear influenced government policy and public pressure on politicians.
Economic Constraints
Evidence: The impact of the Great Depression on Britain, the cost of rearmament.
Analysis: Discuss how economic limitations made another war seem unfeasible and undesirable.
Sympathy for Germany
Evidence: Beliefs that the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh, admiration for Hitler's economic success, perception of Hitler as a strong leader.
Analysis: Explain how these views led some to believe that Germany's demands were justified and appeasement was a viable option.
Fear of Communism
Evidence: The rise of the Soviet Union, perception of communism as a greater threat than Nazism.
Analysis: How did this fear lead to a desire to avoid conflict with Germany and potentially see Germany as a bulwark against communism?
International Factors
Evidence: Lack of reliable allies (France's internal issues, League of Nations' ineffectiveness).
Analysis: Discuss how Britain's diplomatic isolation influenced its decision to appease Germany.
Evaluation and Judgement
Weigh the relative importance of the factors discussed. Were any factors intertwined? Provide a nuanced argument for your chosen stance on the most significant cause of appeasement.
Conclusion
Reiterate your argument, summarizing the key reasons why you believe fear of another war was or was not the most significant factor driving British appeasement. Briefly mention the consequences of this policy.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
How far was Britain’s appeasement policy towards Germany caused by fear of another war?
The question requires the candidate to identify a number of factors that led to the British policy and establish which of them is considered to be the most important. There will need to be a supported comparative judgement not just a simple assertion of relative importance.
The majority of British people wished to avoid conflict – memories of the Great War and its suffering were still present – examples of the Oxford ‘King and Country’ debate 1933 and the Peace Ballot 1935. Britain in the 1930s was struggling with the impact of the Depression, and so the country could not afford another war and heavy rearmament.
Many felt that the Treaty of Versailles had been too strict, and that Germany had a right to try and regain lost lands and to rebuild its weakened forces. Many saw Hitler as an effective and trustworthy leader. He had achieved considerable success in a short time in staging the recovery of the German economy. Fear of Communism which was seen as a greater threat to European peace and national security than a revived Germany. German recovery was seen as a potential ‘buffer’ against possible soviet expansionism.
Lack of effective allies. France had domestic problems and was unwilling to outwardly challenge German revival and the League of Nations seemed increasingly ineffective in dealing with international confrontations.
Having explored possible reasons for appeasement candidates must then make a reasoned choice about which was/were the most important factor(s). More sophisticated responses might highlight the complex interactions between several factors to reach a judgement.
Accept any other valid responses.