top of page

‘The two revolutions of February/March 1917 and October/November 1917 were the result of Russia’s involvement in the First World War.’ Assess the validity of this view.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2020

Topic

Revolution and Dictatorship: Russia, 1917-1953

👑Complete Model Essay

‘The two revolutions of February/March 1917 and October/November 1917 were the result of Russia’s involvement in the First World War.’ Assess the validity of this view.

To What Extent Were the 1917 Russian Revolutions a Result of World War One?

The year 1917 saw two revolutions erupt in Russia, toppling the Tsarist autocracy and ultimately installing the Bolsheviks in power. While these revolutions were undoubtedly influenced by a myriad of factors, the extent to which Russia's involvement in World War One acted as the primary catalyst remains a topic of debate. This essay will argue that while the war exacerbated pre-existing tensions and provided opportunities, it was ultimately the deep-seated political, social, and economic grievances within Russia that proved decisive in bringing about the revolutions.

The Impact of War

Unquestionably, World War One placed immense strain on Russia, exposing the inherent weaknesses of the Tsarist regime and fueling the flames of discontent. The war effort crippled the already struggling economy. Inflation soared, the transportation system collapsed, and food shortages became rampant, leading to widespread hardship, especially in urban centers. These dire conditions fueled social unrest, evident in the strikes and protests that rocked Petrograd in February 1917, ultimately contributing to the downfall of the Tsar.

Furthermore, the war severely undermined the already weak authority of the Tsar. Military defeats, coupled with inadequate supplies and poor leadership, led to mass desertions and plummeting morale. The Tsar's decision to personally lead the army from the front proved disastrous, isolating him from the people and leaving the Tsarina, Alexandra, and the discredited Rasputin to manage affairs back home. This mismanagement further eroded public trust and intensified calls for change.

The war also provided a powerful rallying cry for opposition groups, particularly the Bolsheviks. Lenin, exiled in Switzerland, seized upon the war's unpopularity, advocating for "peace, land, and bread" in his April Theses. The Bolsheviks skillfully exploited the war-weariness of the masses, portraying themselves as the only party capable of ending the conflict and delivering on the people's demands. Their message resonated strongly with soldiers, workers, and peasants, bolstering their support and contributing to their eventual triumph in October.

Underlying Tensions and Long-Term Causes

While the war undoubtedly acted as a catalyst, it is crucial to acknowledge the deep-rooted issues plaguing Russia long before 1914. The Tsarist regime was inherently autocratic, denying its citizens basic political rights and resisting any meaningful reform. Decades of discontent, fueled by economic inequality, land hunger among the peasantry, and the brutal suppression of dissent, created a volatile atmosphere ripe for revolution.

The failures of the Provisional Government, established after the Tsar's abdication, further demonstrate that the roots of revolution ran deeper than wartime grievances. Despite initial popularity, the Provisional Government proved unable to address the fundamental problems plaguing Russia. Their decision to continue the increasingly unpopular war, coupled with their inability to enact meaningful social or economic reforms, alienated large segments of the population, paving the way for the Bolsheviks' rise to power.

Moreover, the role of ideology and leadership should not be underestimated. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin and Trotsky, were a highly organized and determined group with a clear vision for Russia's future. Their ideology, promising radical change and an end to the war, resonated with a population desperate for a break from the past. The Bolsheviks' ability to capitalize on the chaos and disillusionment of 1917 and mobilize support for their cause ultimately proved decisive.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while World War One undeniably exacerbated existing tensions and created opportunities for revolutionary change, it is essential to recognize that the Russian Revolutions were not solely a product of the war. The seeds of discontent had been sown long before 1914, stemming from fundamental flaws in the political, social, and economic fabric of Tsarist Russia. The war acted as a catalyst, accelerating the inevitable breakdown of the old order and providing a platform for radical change. However, it was ultimately the combination of deep-seated grievances, the failures of successive governments, and the ideological appeal and strategic acumen of the Bolsheviks that ultimately determined the course of events in 1917.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Essay Plan
The two revolutions of February/March 1917 and October/November 1917 were the result of Russia’s involvement in the First World War. Assess the validity of this view.

Introduction
Introduce the essay by outlining the context of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and its two phases. Briefly introduce the view that the war was the main cause of the revolution and outline the arguments that will be explored in the essay.

Arguments supporting the view
Wartime Economic Chaos
Explain how the war led to economic hardship, including inflation, shortages, and unemployment. Discuss how these factors fueled social unrest and contributed to the February/March Revolution. Explain how the Bolsheviks were able to capitalize on this discontent in October/November.

Military Failure and Disillusionment
Discuss the impact of military conscription and the military's failure to achieve victory on public morale. Highlight the role of failures like the Brusilov Offensive in furthering disillusionment. Connect this to the loss of legitimacy for the Tsar and the Provisional Government.

Propaganda and Opposition
Explain how the war provided a focal point for opposition propaganda. Focus on the role of Lenin and the Bolsheviks, particularly their promise of peace and their ability to exploit war-weariness. Briefly touch on the role of German support in facilitating Lenin's return and providing funding.

Mutiny and War-Weariness
Explain how the mutiny of war-weary soldiers and sailors in Petrograd was crucial to the success of the February/March Revolution. Discuss how war-weariness continued to fuel support for the Bolsheviks and contributed to the Red Army's success.

Arguments challenging the view
Pre-existing Political Discontent
Discuss how the Tsar's autocratic rule and the inadequacies of the political system created pre-existing political discontent. Argue that the revolution was as much a protest against these failures as it was about the war.

Economic and Social Deficiencies
Explain that the war exacerbated existing economic and social problems, but that these problems were present before the war. Argue that these underlying factors were more significant in causing the revolution.

Political Leadership and Ideology
Highlight the role of veteran opposition leaders like the members of the Duma and the Bolsheviks, who were ready to seize power. Emphasize the importance of their ideologies, like "democracy" and "all power to the soviets" in attracting support.

Fortuitous Circumstances and the Kornilov Coup
Explain how the Kornilov coup in July 1917 weakened the Provisional Government and provided an opportunity for the Bolsheviks to arm and consolidate their power. Argue that the Bolshevik seizure of power in October/November was more of a coup than a revolution inspired by the war.

Conclusion
Conclude by offering a balanced assessment of the arguments. Acknowledge the role of the war in exacerbating existing problems but also recognize the pre-existing political and social tensions. Ultimately, argue that the revolution was a complex event with multiple causes, and that the war was a significant but not the only contributing factor.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Arguments Supporting the View of World War I as the Cause of the Russian Revolutions
Arguments supporting the view that the two revolutions of February/March 1917 and October/November 1917 were the result of Russia’s involvement in the First World War might include:


The war brought economic chaos with inflation, the collapse of the railway system, lack of food, factory closures and unemployment. These raised the cost of living, fuelling social distress which led to protests and strikes in cities and arson and lawless behaviour in the countryside. The former provided the impetus for revolution in February/March and the widespread discontent helps explain support for the Bolsheviks and the ease with which they were able to effect their revolution in October/November.


Military conscription hit peasants and inadequate provisions and military failures brought desertion and fuelled the collapse of authority. The link between military failure and revolutionary activity grew even stronger after the failure of the Brusilov offensive (June 1917).


The war increased political disillusionment with the Russian leadership: first the Tsar (leading his troops from the Front) and subsequently, the middle-class democratic Provisional Government; since neither were prepared to end the war, nor able to win it, they lost the support of ‘the people’.


The failures of the war provided a focus for oppositional propaganda. This was particularly important to the Bolsheviks, e.g. Lenin’s promise of ‘peace’ in his April theses; Lenin’s return was facilitated by the Germans and the Bolsheviks received German funding.


Mutiny from the war-weary soldiers and sailors of Petrograd was crucial to the success of the February/March revolution, while war-weariness helped fuel the ranks of the Red Army and unite workers and peasants against the Provisional Government in October/November.



Arguments Challenging the View of World War I as the Cause of the Russian Revolutions
Arguments challenging the view that the two revolutions of February/March 1917 and October/November 1917 were the result of Russia’s involvement in the First World War might include:


Political discontent was high in 1917 and neither Tsar Nicholas II, nor the subsequent PG leaders, Prince Lvov and Kerensky, could command respect. The revolutions were as much a protest against failures of leadership and inadequate political systems as about wartime issues.


Russia had been involved in war for three years without revolution and during that period wartime provisioning had improved. It was the broader deficiencies of the economy and social structure that really caused the revolution.


There was a long tradition of political opposition in Russia and the Dual power members were veteran campaigners for political influence. They and the Bolsheviks seized power as a result of their ideology/promises (e.g. ‘democracy’ (Feb/March) and ‘all power to the soviets’ (Oct/Nov); the appeal of the opposition was broader than merely ending war.


Opposition leadership (Lenin and Trotsky) and organisation was an important factor in Oct/Nov, in contrast to a weak and illegitimate Provisional Government which refused to make changes before the election of a Constituent Assembly; in Feb/March, Duma/Military leadership helped topple the Tsar but the revolution was more genuinely popular.


The fortuitous circumstances following the Kornilov coup in July 1917, aided the 2nd revolution. This left the Bolsheviks armed and so provided for the Bolsheviks’ seizure of power in October – which was a coup by a highly motivated political group.



Conclusion
Students may argue either way. Some will see the impact of war in all the revolutionary activity of 1917, whereas others may prefer to highlight the inadequacies of the political systems and the promises made by opponents of those systems. Reward those who maintain a good focus on the causes of both revolutions and avoid undue narrative about the broader events and developments of 1917.

bottom of page