top of page

‘The actions of the American Indian Movement of the 1960s and 1970s did more to advance the civil rights of Native Americans than any other factor during the period from 1865 to 1992.’ How far do you agree?

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2022

Topic

Civil rights in the USA 1865-1992

👑Complete Model Essay

‘The actions of the American Indian Movement of the 1960s and 1970s did more to advance the civil rights of Native Americans than any other factor during the period from 1865 to 1992.’ How far do you agree?

The Actions of the American Indian Movement: A Catalyst for Civil Rights?

The assertion that "the actions of the American Indian Movement of the 1960s and 1970s did more to advance the civil rights of Native Americans than any other factor during the period from 1865 to 1992" is a bold statement. While AIM undoubtedly played a pivotal role in raising awareness and prompting policy changes, it is crucial to assess its impact within the broader context of the ongoing struggle for Native American rights. This essay will explore the arguments both for and against this claim, examining the contributions of AIM alongside other significant factors that contributed to the advancement of Native American civil rights.

The Impact of AIM

There is no doubt that AIM's militant approach brought much-needed attention to the plight of Native Americans. Their protests, often dramatic and controversial, succeeded in shaking the complacency of the American public and forcing the government to acknowledge the injustices faced by indigenous communities.

AIM's actions, such as the occupation of Alcatraz Island in 1969, the Wounded Knee siege in 1973, and the Trail of Broken Treaties protest in 1972, served as powerful symbols of Native American resistance. They highlighted the broken promises and continued oppression of Native peoples, forcing the government to engage in negotiations and address their demands.

Moreover, AIM's involvement in legal battles, such as the fight to reclaim tribal lands, had tangible results. Their efforts led to significant legal victories, including the Oneida Indian Nation of New York vs. County of Oneida case in 1985, which reaffirmed tribal sovereignty and land rights.

Furthermore, AIM's emphasis on cultural revitalization played a crucial role in promoting Native American identity and pride. They established cultural centers and supported traditional practices, helping to counter the assimilationist policies of the past.

Other Factors Contributing to Change

However, attributing the entirety of the advancement of Native American civil rights to AIM overlooks the contributions of other significant actors and movements. It is important to acknowledge the role of the federal government, particularly during the Nixon and Ford administrations, which saw the passage of landmark legislation such as the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, which granted Native tribes greater autonomy in governing their affairs.

The New Deal, while flawed in its implementation, also had a measureable impact on Native American communities. Programs like the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 aimed to reverse the assimilationist policies of the past and promote tribal self-governance.

The Supreme Court played a crucial role in defending tribal rights through landmark decisions in cases such as **Fisher vs. District Court*(1976), **Sioux Tribe of Indians vs. United States*(1980), and **Seminole Tribe of Florida vs. Florida*(1996), which furthered tribal sovereignty and land claims.

Moreover, the work of individuals like John Collier, who served as Commissioner of Indian Affairs during the New Deal, and organizations like the National Indian Youth Council (NIYC) and the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) were instrumental in advocating for Native American rights. These organizations provided a platform for Native voices and helped to organize communities to fight for their rights.

Furthermore, the growing awareness of the plight of Native Americans among the general public, fueled by the media coverage of AIM's actions, played a critical role in shaping public opinion. This growing awareness created pressure on the government to address the injustices faced by Native communities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while AIM's actions undeniably played a crucial role in raising awareness and prompting change in the fight for Native American civil rights, it is inaccurate to credit them as the sole driving force. The complex tapestry of change was woven by the efforts of various actors – government initiatives, legal battles, the efforts of individuals and organizations, and the growing public awareness. AIM served as a catalyst, pushing the government and society to confront the legacy of oppression, but ultimately, the advancement of Native American rights was the result of a collective struggle.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

The actions of the American Indian Movement of the 1960s and 1970s did more to advance the civil rights of Native Americans than any other factor during the period from 1865 to 1992. How far do you agree?

This essay will argue that the actions of the American Indian Movement (AIM) were a pivotal factor in advancing the civil rights of Native Americans during the period from 1865 to 1992, but that other factors, such as government initiatives, legal challenges, and public opinion, also played a significant role.

In Support of the Hypothesis

AIM’s Militant Tactics: It can be argued that the more militant approach of Red Power, as exemplified by AIM, brought much needed attention to the plight of Native Americans. Protests, occupations, and acts of civil disobedience, such as the Siege of Alcatraz and the Wounded Knee occupation, forced the government and the public to confront the injustices faced by Native communities. This media attention helped to generate public support for Native American rights and put pressure on the government to address their concerns.

Reduction of Native American Imprisonment: AIM also played a significant role in reducing the number of arrests and imprisonments of Native Americans. They challenged the discriminatory practices of law enforcement and fought for the recognition of tribal sovereignty in criminal justice matters. This resulted in the creation of tribal courts and the reduction of federal intervention in Native affairs.

Promoting Native American Culture: AIM actively promoted the preservation and revival of Native American culture. They organized powwows, cultural events, and educational programs to raise awareness of Native American traditions and history. This helped to counter the negative stereotypes and cultural erasure that Native Americans had faced for centuries.

Legal Victories: AIM was instrumental in securing legal victories that regained tribal lands and asserted tribal sovereignty. They worked with legal teams to challenge land claims and treaties that had been violated by the federal government. These legal battles, such as the Oneida, Fisher, Sioux, and Seminole cases, resulted in the return of millions of acres of land to Native tribes.

Protests and Occupations: The protests of the 1970s, including the Mount Rushmore protest, Wounded Knee occupation, and the Trail of Broken Treaties, highlighted the continued discrimination and marginalization of Native Americans and played a key role in shaping public opinion and forcing the government to take action.

Challenging the Hypothesis

Government Initiatives: The government, particularly during the presidencies of Nixon and Ford, played a crucial role in advancing Native American rights through the passage of legislation such as the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (1975) and the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (1976). These laws granted tribes more autonomy and control over their affairs, particularly in the areas of education and health care.

The New Deal: The New Deal, implemented during the 1930s, provided significant support for Native American communities through programs such as the Indian Reorganization Act (1934), which aimed to promote self-government and economic development. This was a pivotal moment in the history of Native American rights and laid the groundwork for future advancements.

Role of the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court also played a pivotal role in advancing Native American rights through landmark decisions like the Oneida (1974), Fisher (1976), Sioux (1980), and Seminole (1985) cases. These rulings provided legal precedent for the recognition of tribal sovereignty and the right to self-determination.

John Collier: Individual figures such as John Collier, who served as Commissioner of Indian Affairs during the New Deal era, also played a significant role in advocating for Native American rights and promoting policies that supported tribal self-governance and cultural preservation.

Other Organizations: Other organizations, such as the National Indian Youth Council (NIYC) and the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), also made important contributions to advancing Native American civil rights through lobbying, advocacy, and the mobilization of grassroots support.

Public Opinion: A growing awareness of the injustices faced by Native Americans, coupled with a changing public opinion, also played a role in advancing Native American rights. The media coverage of AIM’s actions and other events helped to raise public consciousness about the need for change and led to increased support for Native American civil rights.

Conclusion

The actions of the American Indian Movement (AIM) were undeniably pivotal in advancing the civil rights of Native Americans during the period from 1865 to 1992. Their militant tactics, activism, and legal challenges raised awareness, forced government action, and ultimately contributed to a shift in public opinion. However, it is important to acknowledge that other factors also played a significant role, including government initiatives, legal rulings, the work of other organizations, and a growing awareness of the need for change. While AIM’s actions were crucial, other actors and forces helped to create a more favorable landscape for Native American rights during this period. The fight for Native American rights remains an ongoing process and continues to be shaped by the legacy of AIM and other key factors that contributed to progress in this area.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Supporting the Hypothesis
It might be argued that the more militant approach of Red Power brought attention to the situation of Native Americans.
Answers might consider that AIM led to a reduction in the number of arrests and imprisonment of Native Americans.
Answers might consider that AIM did much to promote the culture of Native Americans.
Answers might consider the success of AIM in court cases to regain tribal lands.
Answers might consider the impact of the siege of Alcatraz.
Answers might consider the protests of the 1970s, Mount Rushmore, Wounded Knee and the Trail of Broken Treaties.

Challenging the Hypothesis
It might be argued that it was the government who did the most, particularly those of Nixon and Ford.
Answers might consider the impact of the New Deal.
Answers might consider the role of the Supreme Court, particularly in the 1970s and 1980s with cases such as Oneida, Fisher, Sioux, Seminole.
Answers might consider role of individuals, such as John Collier.
Answers might consider the importance of other organisations, such as the NIYC and National Congress of American Indians.
Answers might consider public opinion and a realisation that there was need for change.

bottom of page