How far do you agree with this statement: ‘Between 790 and 1750 war had little effect on the lives of ordinary people in Britain.’
Level
GCSE
Year Examined
2021
Topic
British History
👑Complete Model Essay
How far do you agree with this statement: ‘Between 790 and 1750 war had little effect on the lives of ordinary people in Britain.’
Introduction
The statement that war had little effect on the lives of ordinary people in Britain between 790 and 1750 is debatable. While some periods may support this view, significant conflicts undeniably reshaped the social, economic, and political landscape for the everyday citizen. Examining specific conflicts and their consequences will reveal a more nuanced understanding of war's impact on ordinary lives.
Paragraph 1: The Norman Conquest (1066) - A Defining Moment
The Norman Conquest of 1066 stands as a stark example of war’s profound and lasting impact on ordinary lives. William the Conqueror's victory ushered in a new social order, displacing the Anglo-Saxon elite and installing a Norman aristocracy.
⭐Evidence: The Domesday Book, compiled on William's orders, meticulously documents the transfer of land ownership and the imposition of the feudal system. This system, with its inherent inequalities, fundamentally altered the relationship between lord and peasant.
⭐Analysis: Beyond land ownership, the Norman Conquest brought cultural and linguistic shifts. The imposition of Norman French as the language of the court and administration impacted everyday communication and governance. This period exemplifies how a single conflict can have far-reaching consequences on the lives of ordinary people, shaping their social structures, economic realities, and even their language.
Paragraph 2: Medieval Warfare - Burdens and Disruptions
Warfare during the medieval period, particularly under monarchs like Edward I, continued to directly impact ordinary citizens. Edward I's campaigns in Wales and Scotland, while driven by ambition, relied heavily on the contributions of his subjects.
⭐Evidence: The feudal system obligated lords to provide the king with military service, which in turn, placed a burden on their tenants. Villages were compelled to provide men for the king's armies, often leaving farms and workshops short-handed.
⭐Analysis: The financial costs of war also trickled down. To fund his campaigns, Edward I levied taxes, impacting the livelihoods of peasants and merchants alike. Furthermore, the loss of men to war, whether through death, injury, or capture, had a tangible impact on communities, affecting family structures, agricultural productivity, and the transmission of skills and trades.
Paragraph 3: Periods of Relative Peace - A More Nuanced Picture
It is crucial to acknowledge that the impact of war on ordinary people was not uniformly severe throughout the period. There were times when conflicts had a less direct effect on everyday life, particularly during reigns focused on naval power or foreign alliances.
⭐Evidence: The reign of Elizabeth I provides a notable example. While England was engaged in conflicts with Spain, Elizabeth's emphasis on naval warfare and her support for Spain's enemies on the continent (like the Dutch) somewhat shielded the English population from the immediate effects of war on their own soil.
⭐Analysis: While naval warfare still involved the recruitment of sailors and impacted coastal communities, the absence of large-scale land battles on English soil meant that the daily lives of most remained relatively undisturbed compared to earlier periods marked by constant internal strife or invasions.
Paragraph 4: The English Civil War (1642-1651) - Bringing War Home
The English Civil War (1642-1651) marks a turning point, shattering any notion that war was a distant event for ordinary people. This conflict, fought entirely on English soil, brought the realities of war to the doorsteps of both rural and urban communities.
⭐Evidence: The Civil War resulted in widespread destruction of property and farmland, disrupting agricultural production and trade. Both Parliamentarians and Royalists levied taxes and forcibly conscripted soldiers, directly impacting the lives and livelihoods of people from all walks of life.
⭐Analysis: The Civil War demonstrated the devastating economic and social consequences of internal conflict. The movement of armies, the sieges of towns, and the breakdown of law and order led to displacement, famine, and disease, affecting all levels of society. This period underscores how internal conflicts, even more so than foreign wars, can deeply impact the lives of ordinary people.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the impact of war on ordinary lives in Britain between 790 and 1750 fluctuated, to claim it was minimal is a mischaracterization. The evidence points to a complex relationship between conflict and daily life.
From the societal upheaval of the Norman Conquest, the burdens of medieval levies, to the devastating realities of the English Civil War, war, in various forms, touched the lives of ordinary people. While periods of relative peace and the focus on naval power at times mitigated the impact, the historical record demonstrates that war was not a distant event but a force that shaped the social, economic, and political landscape for everyday citizens in profound ways.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
State your stance on the question - I disagree with the statement that war had little effect on the lives of ordinary people in Britain between 790 and 1750. While some periods saw less direct impact, major conflicts significantly altered the social, economic, and cultural landscape for everyday citizens.
Paragraph 1: The Norman Conquest (1066) and its Aftermath
Argument: The Norman Conquest had a profound and lasting impact on the lives of ordinary people.
⭐Evidence: William the Conqueror's victory led to the displacement of the English aristocracy and the establishment of a new Norman elite. This resulted in a new social hierarchy and the imposition of the feudal system.
⭐Analysis: The Domesday Book provides evidence of the increased burden on peasants, with a rise in the number of serfs. The forced adoption of Norman French also impacted daily life and communication.
Paragraph 2: Medieval Warfare and its Impact
Argument: Wars during the medieval period, particularly under Edward I, had a direct and significant impact on ordinary people.
⭐Evidence: Edward I's campaigns in Wales and Scotland required a large feudal levy, forcing villages to provide men and resources.
⭐Analysis: The loss of young men to war had a ripple effect on villages, impacting agriculture, skilled labor, and family structures. The financial burdens of war also trickled down to commoners.
Paragraph 3: Counterexamples - Periods of Limited Impact
Counter-Argument: Acknowledge periods where warfare had less direct impact on ordinary people.
⭐Evidence: Elizabeth I's reign saw conflicts with Spain, but her focus on naval warfare and support for enemies of Spain (like the Dutch) lessened the impact on the English population.
⭐Analysis: While naval warfare still involved sailors, the lack of large-scale land battles on English soil meant less disruption to everyday life compared to earlier periods.
Paragraph 4: The English Civil War (1642-1651) - A Turning Point
Argument: The English Civil War represents a significant turning point where the impact of war on ordinary people dramatically increased.
⭐Evidence: The Civil War was fought on English soil, leading to widespread destruction, displacement, and economic hardship. Both sides levied taxes and conscripted soldiers, directly impacting communities.
⭐Analysis: The Civil War's impact transcended social class, affecting both rural and urban populations. It highlighted the potential for internal conflicts to have devastating consequences for ordinary people.
Conclusion
Restate your stance: While certain periods saw less direct impact from warfare, the overall evidence suggests that war significantly affected the lives of ordinary people in Britain between 790 and 1750.
Summarize your main points: From the social and economic upheaval of the Norman Conquest to the burdens of medieval levies and the devastating impact of the English Civil War, conflict touched the lives of everyday people in various ways.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
I Disagree
I disagree with this statement considerably. I believe that war did have a considerable effect on the lives of ordinary people.
The Norman Conquest
An example of this would be the Norman conquest. The success of William in taking control of England in 1066 changed the lives of people in England. The English aristocracy and church was removed by William and replaced with a feudal system and Norman-style church that was far-removed from that of the Anglo-Saxons. The Domesday Book gives us clear evidence of the impact on the lives of people. The number of serfs in England rose, which is evidence of a greater control over the lives of peasants in England. Englishmen had to learn Norman French if they were to communicate effectively with their new lords.
Later Medieval Period
Later on in the medieval period, there was also a significant impact on the lives of ordinary people. For example, during the reign of Edward I, he took 20,000 troops to war against Wales and Scotland. This army was partly made up of the feudal levy, in which villages had to provide men and arms for the king. The impact on ordinary people was massive, as many villages would lose young men to war, which had an effect on village life, with labourers and skilled workers being killed.
Elizabethan Era
However, some aspects of war did not have a significant impact on the lives of ordinary people and, therefore, supports the statement. For example, during the reign of Elizabeth I, although there were wars, primarily with Spain, they had less impact on ordinary people. This was because she tried to avoid direct conflict and was happier to help the enemies of her enemies. By supporting the Netherlands against Spain by sending money and equipment, she was reducing the impact of war on ordinary people. Also, there was an increase in naval warfare during this period, most notably against the Spanish Armada. Although this still involved large numbers of sailors, there was no landbased war, so the effect on ordinary people was reduced.
Conclusion
In conclusion, although there are some aspects of warfare between 790 and 1750 that had little impact on the lives of ordinary people, I am more inclined to disagree with the statement. War, particularly when it involved huge armies, as in during the conquest of Wales and Scotland, or during the Civil Wars of the 1640s, had a huge impact on the lives of ordinary people either through bearing the financial cost of the war through increased tax, or from having to serve as a soldier and risk death or injury as a result.