top of page

‘Imperial rivalry was the most important reason for the development of the British Empire in the period from 1857 to 1965.’ How far do you agree?

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2020

Topic

Britain

👑Complete Model Essay

‘Imperial rivalry was the most important reason for the development of the British Empire in the period from 1857 to 1965.’ How far do you agree?

Imperial Rivalry: A Driving Force in the British Empire (1857-1965)

The assertion that "imperial rivalry was the most important reason for the development of the British Empire in the period from 1857 to 1965" is a complex one. While imperial rivalry undoubtedly played a significant role in shaping British imperial expansion, arguing that it was the *mostimportant factor overlooks the intricate interplay of economic, strategic, and ideological motivations that fueled British imperialism. To fully understand the development of the British Empire, we must consider the various factors at play, acknowledging the prominence of imperial rivalry while recognizing its limitations.

The Role of Imperial Rivalry

Imperial rivalry, particularly in Africa during the mid-to-late 19th century, exerted a powerful influence on British imperial ambitions. The fear of French expansion, epitomized by the Fashoda Incident of 1898, spurred British efforts to secure control over key territories in Africa. The scramble for Africa, fueled by the desire to outmaneuver rival powers like France and Germany, led to the rapid expansion of the British Empire across the continent. The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885, designed to regulate European colonization, inadvertently intensified the competitive spirit, further pushing Britain to assert its dominance. The rise of Germany under Kaiser Wilhelm II, with its aggressive pursuit of colonies ("a place in the sun"), also contributed to the heightened sense of rivalry. In India, the fear of Russia's expansion in Central Asia and the perceived threat to British dominance pushed the British to reinforce their control over the subcontinent.

Furthermore, the pursuit of imperial prestige played a crucial role in shaping British policy. The Suez Canal, connecting Europe to Asia, was not only strategically important but also a symbol of British power and influence. Maintaining control of the Suez Canal, as evidenced by the British intervention in Egypt in 1882, served to bolster British prestige on the world stage and demonstrate their dominance in the region.

Beyond Rivalry: Economic and Strategic Factors

While imperial rivalry undeniably contributed to the development of the British Empire, other factors, particularly economic and strategic considerations, played equally significant roles. The vast raw materials available in Africa, such as rubber, gold, diamonds, and minerals, held immense economic value for the industrialising British economy. The acquisition of these resources strengthened British industry and fueled economic growth. The strategic importance of Africa, particularly the route to India, was also a key driver of British policy. Ensuring secure access to its valuable colonies in Asia through strategically located territories in Africa was vital to maintaining British power and influence. The acquisition of Egypt, with its strategic Suez Canal, further highlighted the importance of securing vital trade routes.

The impact of the First World War further demonstrates the intertwining of economic and strategic factors. The war provided an opportunity for the British to gain control of territories previously held by the defeated German Empire, primarily in Africa. These "mandates" granted by the League of Nations not only extended British control but also provided access to valuable raw materials and strengthened their strategic position.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while imperial rivalry played a significant role in the development of the British Empire in the period from 1857 to 1965, it was not the sole driving force. Economic factors, including the desire for raw materials and control of trade routes, along with strategic considerations, played equally important roles. The intricate interplay of these factors, fueled by the ambition of maximizing British power and influence on the global stage, ultimately shaped the vast expanse of the British Empire. The assertion that imperial rivalry was the *mostimportant reason for the British Empire's development is therefore overly simplistic.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Imperial Rivalry: A Catalyst for British Expansion, 1857-1965

This essay will explore the assertion that imperial rivalry was the most significant factor driving the development of the British Empire between 1857 and 1965. While acknowledging the considerable influence of economic and strategic imperatives, it argues that the threat posed by rival powers, particularly France and Germany, played a crucial role in shaping British imperial ambitions and actions during this period.

The Importance of Imperial Rivalry

The Scramble for Africa provides a compelling case study. The threat posed by France, particularly evident in the Fashoda Incident of 1898, spurred the British to aggressively expand their control over territories in Africa. The fear of a French-controlled corridor across the continent, potentially threatening British access to Egypt and the Suez Canal, fueled a fierce competition for territory. Similarly, the rise of Germany under Kaiser Wilhelm II and its pursuit of a "place in the sun" further intensified the rivalry. Germany's colonial ambitions in Africa, particularly in East Africa, forced Britain to react defensively, leading to further territorial acquisitions to secure its own interests.

Moreover, the pursuit of imperial dominance was intricately linked to the maintenance of Great Power status. Britain's global influence was largely built upon its vast colonial network. The loss of colonies to rival powers would have been a significant blow to its international standing. The rivalry with France and Germany, therefore, forced Britain to actively maintain its imperial standing through territorial expansion and strategic posturing.

The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 further highlights the impact of rivalry on British colonial policy. The conference, intended to regulate European colonization of Africa, ultimately accelerated the scramble for territory. Fearing the growing influence of other powers, Britain felt compelled to increase its acquisitions in Africa to maintain its dominance.

Prestige also played a significant role in fueling imperial rivalry. The acquisition and maintenance of colonies were seen as a measure of national pride and power. The competition with France over Egypt, particularly after the construction of the Suez Canal, exemplifies this dynamic. The Suez Canal, strategically vital for British access to India, became a symbol of British imperial power, and France's attempts to challenge British dominance in the region only strengthened Britain's resolve to maintain control.

Beyond Rivalry: Economic and Strategic Considerations

While imperial rivalry played a major role, it is important to acknowledge the existence of other factors. Economic motivations played a crucial role in shaping British colonial ambitions. The vast resources of Africa, including raw materials like rubber and diamonds, were highly desirable for British industries. These economic considerations spurred the acquisition of colonies, feeding the machinery of industrial capitalism.

Furthermore, strategic considerations were essential to British expansion. The acquisition of colonies in Africa was seen as vital for securing the route to India, a vital component of the British Empire. Egypt, with the Suez Canal, provided a crucial link in this chain, and its control remained a strategic priority for Britain throughout the period. The First World War further underscored the strategic importance of colonies. The acquisition of mandates after the war, which granted Britain control over former German colonies, served to further strengthen its global influence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while economic and strategic factors undeniably influenced British imperial expansion, the role of imperial rivalry cannot be understated. The threat posed by rival powers, particularly France and Germany, significantly shaped British imperial ambitions and actions. The scramble for territory in Africa, the pursuit of Great Power status, and the preservation of prestige all demonstrate the profound impact of rivalry on the development of the British Empire. However, it is essential to recognize the complex interplay between these factors and acknowledge that economic and strategic considerations were also crucial in shaping British imperial ambitions during this period.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Supporting the Hypothesis
It might be argued that imperial rivalry was particularly important in Africa in the mid and late nineteenth century. Answers might consider the following points:

⭐The threat of France, particularly the Fashoda incident, in the development of a formal British Empire.
⭐The rivalry with Germany under Kaiser Wilhelm II and Germany's quest for a "place in the sun."
⭐The impact of Empire on Great Power status.
⭐The influence of the Berlin Conference on British policy in Africa.
⭐The issue of prestige, evident throughout the period with India and the Suez Canal.


Challenging the Hypothesis
In challenging the hypothesis, answers might argue that economic factors were more important. Consider:

⭐The raw materials supplied by Africa.
⭐The strategic importance of land in Africa to protect the route to India.
⭐The significance of Egypt and the development of the Suez Canal.
⭐The impact of the First World War and the acquisition of mandates.

bottom of page