top of page

‘The most important change in English central government in the period 1066 to 1216 was the development of the Exchequer.’ How far do you agree?

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2020

Topic

English Government and the Church 1066-1216

👑Complete Model Essay

‘The most important change in English central government in the period 1066 to 1216 was the development of the Exchequer.’ How far do you agree?

The most important change in English central government in the period 1066 to 1216 was the development of the Exchequer. How far do you agree?

The period 1066 to 1216 witnessed significant transformations in English central government, with the development of various institutions and practices that strengthened royal authority and contributed to the emergence of a more centralised state. While the Exchequer played a crucial role in this process, arguing that it was the single most important change is debatable. This essay will examine the development of the Exchequer and its contribution to royal authority, while also considering other crucial changes that may have been equally or even more important.

The Exchequer and its impact

The Exchequer, a system of royal finances, emerged as a clearly defined institution during the reign of Henry I (1100-1135). It served as a central point for receiving and disbursing royal revenues, with sheriffs, who were responsible for collecting taxes in their counties, required to render accounts at the Exchequer. This system brought sheriffs under royal control, enhancing the king's ability to directly manage financial affairs. The Exchequer's transparent methods, with accounts being audited and scrutinized, contributed to a perception of fairness and efficiency, further bolstering royal authority. This was especially important in a period where financial resources were crucial for maintaining royal power.

Furthermore, the Exchequer played a key role in expanding royal finances. By establishing a centralized system for managing revenues, kings could more effectively collect and utilize their resources, meeting the increasing costs of administration, warfare, and court maintenance. The Exchequer's financial efficiency contributed to the growing financial power of the monarchy, a crucial factor in consolidating its authority.

Challenging the centrality of the Exchequer

While the Exchequer's importance in strengthening royal authority is undeniable, it is important to consider other significant developments that may have been equally or even more influential. The development of the role of the chief justiciar, for instance, was crucial for the effective functioning of absentee kingship, a recurring theme in this period. The chief justiciar acted as the king's representative in his absence, overseeing legal matters, administering justice, and maintaining order. This office enabled the monarch to maintain control over the kingdom even when physically absent, a vital element in the successful transition from Norman rule to Angevin dominance.

Another significant development was the evolution of the Chancery, which served as the king's secretariat, responsible for drafting legal documents, royal decrees, and other official communication. While functioning from the very beginning of the period, the Chancery underwent significant development under the Angevins, particularly under Hubert Walter, who oversaw a dramatic increase in chancery documents. This development facilitated the efficient administration of justice and the dissemination of royal pronouncements, contributing to the centralization of power and the expansion of royal influence.

The broader context of centralization

It is important to recognize that the Exchequer, the chief justiciar, and the Chancery were not isolated developments. They were all part of a broader process of centralization and the development of a more bureaucratic government, which began with the Norman Conquest and continued throughout the period. The Normans imported their own ideas of feudal government, with its emphasis on centralized authority and the establishment of a hierarchical system of officials. This process was reinforced by the acquisition of continental possessions by English monarchs, which led to absentee kingship and necessitated the development of efficient mechanisms for administering the kingdom from afar.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the development of the Exchequer was a significant change in English central government from 1066 to 1216, it was not the single most important one. The rise of the chief justiciar, the evolution of the Chancery, and the broader process of centralization and bureaucratic development were all equally crucial in strengthening royal authority and shaping the contours of English government. The Exchequer, as part of this larger process, played a vital role in financial management, but it was not the sole driver of change during this transformative period.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

The most important change in English central government in the period 1066 to 1216 was the development of the Exchequer. How far do you agree?

This essay will explore the argument that the development of the Exchequer was the most important change in English central government between 1066 and 1216. It will consider the ways in which the Exchequer contributed to royal authority, financial stability, and administrative efficiency. However, it will also explore other significant developments, such as the role of the chief justiciar, the chancery, and the wider process of centralisation, to assess their relative importance.

Arguments in favour of the Exchequer:

1. Evidence of Existence and Early Development: The Exchequer is known to have been established in the reign of Henry I, demonstrating its early significance. This institution provided a centralised system for managing royal finances, replacing the less organised arrangements of the Anglo-Saxon period.

2. Control over Sheriffs: The Exchequer played a crucial role in bringing sheriffs under royal control. Sheriffs were required to submit regular accounts to the Exchequer, ensuring their financial activities were subject to scrutiny and accountability. This increased central control over local administration.

3. Transparency and Royal Authority: The Exchequer's transparent methods for handling accounts, with open audits and public records, enhanced royal authority. It demonstrated fairness and accountability, bolstering public trust in the monarchy.

4. Financial Management and Expansion: The Exchequer was a key component of the mechanism by which kings significantly increased their finances. This enabled them to meet the rising costs of administration and warfare, facilitating royal expansion and strengthening the central government.

Arguments against the Exchequer as the most important change:

1. The Chief Justiciar's Role: The development of the role of the chief justiciar was arguably even more important than the Exchequer. The justiciar served as the king's representative in his absence, effectively enabling absentee kingship. This was particularly significant during periods when kings were engaged in continental affairs.

2. The Chancery and Administrative Growth: While the Exchequer focused on finances, the chancery handled legal and administrative matters, evolving significantly under the Angevins. Under Hubert Walter, the chancery saw a marked increase in documentary output, demonstrating its crucial role in record-keeping and governance.

3. Norman Influence and Feudal Government: William I's Norman conquest brought with it significant changes to English central government, including the introduction of feudalism. This system helped to reinforce centralisation by creating a hierarchical system of landholding and obligations, directly impacting the king's authority and resources.

4. Continental Possessions and Absentee Kingship: The acquisition of continental possessions by English kings led to periods of absentee kingship, necessitating the development of institutions and practices to maintain governance during the king's absence. This was a major factor shaping central government and its administrative structures.

5. Centralisation and Bureaucratic Government: The most important change may have been the overall process of centralisation and the development of bureaucratic government. The Exchequer, the chancery, and the chief justiciar were all part of this wider trend, which fundamentally reshaped the English state.

Conclusion:

The development of the Exchequer was a significant change in English central government between 1066 and 1216. It played a crucial role in financial management, enhanced royal authority, and brought greater control over local officials. However, it was not the only important development. The rise of the chief justiciar, the growth of the chancery, and the broader process of centralisation all contributed to the evolution of a more powerful and efficient central government during this period. Ultimately, the relative importance of these changes is a matter of debate, and each had a profound impact on the shape of the English state.

Note:This essay plan provides a framework for your argument. You can further expand on each point by providing specific historical examples, evidence, and analysis. Remember to incorporate relevant scholarly perspectives and sources to support your claims.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Supporting the Hypothesis
Answers might argue that the Exchequer is known to have existed from the reign of Henry I.
Answers might argue that the Exchequer helped to bring sheriffs under royal control by having them regularly render account there.
Answers might argue that through its transparent methods accounts could be seen to be dealt with openly and fairly and so it enhanced royal authority.
Answers might argue that the Exchequer was a key part of the mechanism by which kings increased their finances, so enabling them to meet the financial demands caused by the growing costs of administration and warfare.

Challenging the Hypothesis
In challenging the hypothesis in the question it might be argued that the development of the role of chief justiciar was even more important as this enabled absentee kingship to function effectively.
Answers might argue that the main development was the chancery which functioned from the beginning of the period and underwent much development under the Angevins, when Hubert Walter oversaw a marked increase in chancery documents.
Answers might consider the importing of Norman ideas under William I, especially feudal government which helped to reinforce centralisation of the state.
Answers might consider the acquisition of continental possessions as these led to absentee kingship and the developments stemming from it.
Answers might argue that centralisation and the development of bureaucratic government was the most important change and that the development of the Exchequer and other major offices were just part of this.

bottom of page