‘The Zollverein’s role was economic not political.’ How far do you agree?
Level
AS Level
Year Examined
2023
Topic
The Russian Revolution, 1894–1922
👑Complete Model Essay
‘The Zollverein’s role was economic not political.’ How far do you agree?
The Zollverein’s role was economic not political.’ How far do you agree?
The Zollverein, a German customs union formed in 1834, played a significant role in the economic and political landscape of 19th-century Europe. While its primary objective was to foster economic growth and unity among German states, its impact extended beyond purely economic considerations. This essay will argue that although the Zollverein's origins and immediate aims were primarily economic, it inevitably acquired significant political dimensions that contributed to the growing movement for German unification under Prussian leadership.
Economic Arguments
There is no doubt that the Zollverein was, at its core, an economic project. In the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars, the German Confederation, consisting of 39 states, faced significant economic fragmentation. Each state operated its own customs regime, hindering trade and economic development. The Zollverein aimed to address this issue by creating a single market with no internal tariffs.
Prior to the Zollverein, several smaller customs unions had emerged, highlighting the need for greater economic integration. The Prussian Customs Union (PCU) in the north and the Bavarian and Württemberg and Middle German Commercial Union (MGCU) in the south demonstrated the potential benefits of such arrangements. The collapse of the MGCU in 1831 and the subsequent accession of Hesse-Cassel, Bavaria, and Württemberg to the PCU underscored the economic impracticality of maintaining numerous internal customs barriers. Hesse-Cassel's decision to join the PCU, for example, was largely driven by the fact that the cost of maintaining tariff borders consumed their entire tariff revenue (The Russian Revolution, 1894–1922). The expansion of the PCU into the Zollverein was a pragmatic response to the economic realities of the time.
The Zollverein's emphasis on free trade aligned with the prevailing economic thought of the era. By removing internal barriers and promoting the free flow of goods, it aimed to stimulate economic growth and prosperity for its member states. Furthermore, the Zollverein sought to standardize currencies and weights and measures, further streamlining trade and reducing transaction costs. These efforts demonstrate the fundamentally economic rationale behind its creation.
Political Implications
While the Zollverein's economic role is undeniable, it is crucial to acknowledge its political ramifications. The exclusion of Austria, a major power within the German Confederation, was a clear indication of the Zollverein’s political undertones. Austria, with its protectionist policies designed to safeguard its industries, viewed the Zollverein's free trade principles as a threat. Its absence from the customs union underscored the inherent tension between economic integration and political considerations.
Moreover, the Zollverein, with Prussia at its helm, served as a powerful vehicle for Prussian expansion and influence. By linking Prussia's eastern territories with its Rhineland possessions in the west, the Zollverein helped consolidate Prussian power. The inclusion of Hesse-Cassel was particularly significant in bridging this geographical gap, further strengthening Prussia's position within the German Confederation (History Essay). The admission of Hanover, Electoral Hesse, and other smaller states in 1851 further cemented Prussian dominance within the Zollverein.
The political motivations behind the Zollverein are evident in the words of the Prussian finance minister, who, in 1830, highlighted its potential to both enhance Prussian prosperity and isolate Austria, thereby weakening its grip on the German states. This statement reveals a clear political agenda intertwined with the Zollverein's economic goals.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the Zollverein was undeniably an economic endeavor at its inception, it rapidly evolved into a significant political force. Its success in fostering economic growth and unity among German states, coupled with its exclusion of Austria and the increasing influence it afforded Prussia, contributed to the growing momentum for German unification. The Zollverein's legacy lies in its dual role: as a catalyst for economic integration and as a steppingstone towards the creation of a unified German nation-state under Prussian leadership.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
This essay will assess the statement that "The Zollverein's role was economic not political," examining the extent to which the Zollverein was primarily driven by economic motives. It will explore both the arguments for and against this view, analyzing the economic and political factors that shaped its creation and development.
Arguments for the Economic Role
Economic Benefits and Free Trade
The Zollverein aimed to abolish internal tariffs and customs barriers, facilitating free trade and boosting economic growth. The abolishment of tariffs within the Zollverein and the introduction of uniform tariffs for goods from outside the Zollverein, created a larger market for goods. This increased trade and prosperity and was aligned with the growing popularity of free trade principles.
Previous Customs Unions
The Zollverein was a continuation of earlier customs unions like the Prussian Customs Union (PCU) and the Middle German Commercial Union (MGCU). These unions demonstrated the economic benefits of removing trade barriers, paving the way for the Zollverein. The financial burden of tariff administration and the desire for increased trade provided incentives for states to join previous customs unions, and ultimately the Zollverein.
Austria's Exclusion
Austria's refusal to join the Zollverein was largely driven by economic concerns. Austria had a strong domestic market and preferred to protect its industries through high import duties. Joining the Zollverein would have required Austria to reduce these tariffs, which went against its economic interests.
Arguments for the Political Role
Unifying Prussia
The Zollverein played a significant role in unifying Prussia's territories, connecting its eastern and western regions. The inclusion of Hesse-Cassel, Hanover, and other states bridged geographical gaps and strengthened Prussian influence.
Weakening Austria
Prussian leaders recognized that a free trade organization could not only boost Prussia's economy but also isolate Austria politically. By undermining Austria's regional influence, the Zollverein would strengthen Prussia’s position as a potential leader for a unified Germany.
Force for German Unity
From the 1840s, the Zollverein was increasingly seen as a symbol of German unity, with many states viewing Prussia as a natural leader. This political momentum contributed to the growth and influence of the Zollverein, further blurring the lines between economic and political aims.
Conclusion
The Zollverein's role was undoubtedly influenced by both economic and political considerations. While economic motivations like increased trade and prosperity were significant driving forces, the Zollverein also served as a tool for Prussia to solidify its power and influence within Germany. Ultimately, it was a complex project with intertwined economic and political objectives, making it difficult to definitively claim it was purely economic or political in nature.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
The Zollverein’s role was economic not political. How far do you agree?
Arguments to support this view may consider how, after 1815, the 39 states of the German Confederation managed their own economies. This created innumerable customs barriers and internal tariffs restricted trade. Therefore, to try and tackle these problems several customs unions had been formed. For example, in the north, the Prussian Customs Union (PCU), in the south the Bavarian and Württemberg and Middle German Commercial Union (MGCU). In 1831 the MGCU collapsed, and Hesse-Cassel joined the PCU, as did Bavaria and Württemberg in 1834. Hesse-Cassel was no doubt prompted by the fact that the cost of securing tariff borders and tariff administration had cost her 100% of her tariff income prior to 1830. Therefore, the enlarged PCU, the Zollverein, was a means to achieve increased trade and prosperity by abolishing customs duties.
The Zollverein followed on from these previous customs unions. It was, also, aligned with the increasingly popular idea of free trade – doing away with as many internal trade barriers as possible for goods to move more freely. The Zollverein began attempting to unify both the currencies and weights and measures used by its member states. Economic considerations influenced Austria to remain outside the Zollverein. She disagreed with free trade as within her Empire she had large markets for her home-produced goods. Austria wanted high import duties to protect her industries and markets from cheap imports. If she had joined the Zollverein, then these duties would have to be reduced to the same level as the other member states.
Responses challenging this view might discuss how the Zollverein was a means to help unite Prussia, in the east, with her distant Rhineland territories in the west. In this respect Hesse-Cassel membership was vital in helping to bridge the gap. In 1851 Hanover, Electoral Hesse and some lesser states joined the Zollverein, further rounding off this gap. It did have a clear political function. In 1830, before its creation, the Prussian finance minister had pointed out to his king that a free trade organization would not only bring prosperity to Prussia but isolate Austria, also. This isolation would lead to a weakening of Austria’s political influence over the other German states. Many argued that if the Zollverein, under Prussian leadership, brought economic advantages then it made sense to pursue a political union. From the 1840s the Zollverein was seen, increasingly, as a force for German unity and many northern German states saw Prussia as the natural leader of a united Germany.
Accept any other valid responses.