top of page

To what extent was 1925 a turning point in international relations in the 1920s?

Level

AS LEVEL

Year Examined

2021

Topic

The League of Nations and international relations in the 1920s

👑Complete Model Essay

To what extent was 1925 a turning point in international relations in the 1920s?

To What Extent Was 1925 a Turning Point in International Relations in the 1920s?

The year 1925 witnessed the signing of the Locarno Pact, a landmark agreement that significantly shaped international relations throughout the 1920s. While some historians argue that it merely formalized existing arrangements, the Locarno Pact undeniably contributed to a period of relative stability and fostered a spirit of cooperation often referred to as the "Spirit of Locarno." This essay will examine the extent to which 1925 marked a turning point in international relations, considering both the positive impacts of the Locarno Pact and its limitations.

The Locarno Pact and Improved Franco-German Relations

The Locarno Pact, signed by Germany, France, Belgium, Great Britain, and Italy, was undoubtedly a significant achievement. By guaranteeing Germany's western borders with France and Belgium, it provided a sense of security and facilitated reconciliation between these former enemies. This was particularly crucial given the bitter legacy of World War I and the subsequent tensions over reparations and the occupation of the Ruhr. The pact's provisions, including the demilitarization of the Rhineland and the promise of allied troop withdrawal by 1930, further eased anxieties and paved the way for improved relations. The admission of Germany into the League of Nations in 1926, largely as a result of Locarno, further solidified this progress.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that the "Spirit of Locarno" was built on fragile foundations. The pact primarily focused on Germany's western borders, leaving its eastern frontiers with Poland and Czechoslovakia unaddressed. While agreements to negotiate border disputes were reached, these lacked the guarantees provided to France and Belgium, generating resentment and insecurity in Eastern Europe. The absence of concrete British commitments to defend Poland and Czechoslovakia further highlighted these limitations. This regional disparity in security arrangements would later contribute to instability and undermine collective security efforts.

Economic Factors and the Role of Stresemann

While the Locarno Pact played a role in fostering international cooperation, attributing the entirety of the "Spirit of Locarno" to this single agreement would be an oversimplification. The improved economic climate following the implementation of the Dawes Plan in 1924 played a crucial role in easing tensions. By restructuring German reparation payments and providing loans, the Dawes Plan facilitated economic recovery in Germany and stabilized the European economy as a whole. This newfound stability provided a more conducive environment for diplomatic solutions and fostered a sense of shared purpose among European nations.

Furthermore, the efforts of individuals like Gustav Stresemann, the German Foreign Minister, were instrumental in fostering reconciliation. Stresemann, committed to restoring Germany's position in Europe through peaceful means, actively pursued dialogue and compromise. His commitment to fulfilling the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, albeit selectively, and his active engagement in the League of Nations helped rebuild trust and project an image of a responsible and cooperative Germany on the world stage. Recognizing the importance of economic interdependence, Stresemann also played a key role in negotiating the Dawes Plan and promoting international trade.

Conclusion

In assessing the significance of 1925 in international relations, it is evident that while the Locarno Pact alone did not constitute a complete turning point, it did mark a significant step toward a more peaceful and cooperative international order. The agreement's success in normalizing relations between France and Germany, coupled with the positive economic climate fostered by the Dawes Plan and the efforts of individuals like Stresemann, created a tangible sense of optimism and ushered in a period of relative stability. However, the limitations of the Locarno Pact, particularly its failure to adequately address Eastern European security concerns, ultimately undermined its long-term effectiveness. The "Spirit of Locarno," while genuine, proved to be fragile and ultimately unable to withstand the challenges posed by the Great Depression and the rise of fascism in the 1930s.

Bibliography
Keylor, William R. <i>The Twentieth-Century World and Beyond: An International History Since 1900</i>. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Mazower, Mark. <i>Dark Continent: Europe's Twentieth Century</i>. Vintage Books, 2000.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
Briefly introduce the state of international relations in the aftermath of WWI. Mention the significance of 1925 and the Locarno Pact. State your argument about whether 1925 was a turning point or not.

Arguments for 1925 being a turning point
The Locarno Pact and its implications: Detail the provisions of the Pact and how it aimed to stabilize Western Europe. Discuss the symbolism of Germany's acceptance into the League of Nations and the "Spirit of Locarno."
Positive consequences: Explain the withdrawal of Allied troops from the Rhineland, the Franco-Polish and Franco-Czechoslovakian treaties, and the Kellogg-Briand Pact as signs of improving international relations.

Arguments against 1925 being a turning point
Limited scope and effectiveness: Highlight the Pact's failure to address Germany's eastern borders and the lack of concrete guarantees for Poland and Czechoslovakia. Emphasize the absence of British commitment to Eastern European security.
Alternative explanations for improvement: Argue that the economic recovery facilitated by the Dawes Plan and the diplomatic efforts of individuals like Gustav Stresemann played a more significant role in improving relations than the Locarno Pact itself.

Conclusion
Reiterate your stance on the extent to which 1925 was a turning point in international relations. Briefly acknowledge the limitations of both sides of the argument. Conclude by emphasizing the temporary nature of the "Spirit of Locarno" considering the eventual outbreak of WWII.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

To what extent was 1925 a turning point in international relations in the 1920s?

In 1925, the Locarno Pact was signed, so responses will need to consider whether this was a significant landmark in international relations or whether it, in fact, changed very little. It confirmed the western borders of Germany with France and Belgium. This was supported by other signatories GB and Italy. It stabilized relations between France and Germany. It was followed by French Treaties with Poland and Czechoslovakia and followed up by Kellogg-Briand Pact. It was agreed that allied troops should leave Rhineland in 1930, five years ahead of schedule. Germany was admitted to the League of Nations in 1926. The ‘Spirit of Locarno’ was created.

It did not actually change anything but simply formalized arrangements already made in the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles. It provided no real guarantees for Poland and Czechoslovakia, just an agreement to negotiate over border issues. Poland and Czechoslovakia received no guarantees from GB. Better relations were really a result of better economic circumstances following the Dawes Plan of 1924. The improvement of Franco-German relations owed more to the efforts of Gustav Stresemann.

Accept other valid responses.

bottom of page