‘British foreign policy during the period from 1689 to 1714 was largely unsuccessful.’ How far do you agree?
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2021
Topic
The making of Georgian Britain 1678-c.1760
👑Complete Model Essay
‘British foreign policy during the period from 1689 to 1714 was largely unsuccessful.’ How far do you agree?
British Foreign Policy, 1689-1714: Success or Failure?
The period from 1689 to 1714 witnessed a significant shift in British foreign policy, driven by the ascension of William and Mary after the Glorious Revolution and the subsequent wars with France. Evaluating the effectiveness of British foreign policy during this era is a complex task, requiring careful consideration of both successes and shortcomings. While arguments can be made for both sides, the evidence suggests that British foreign policy, though fraught with challenges, ultimately achieved significant successes, securing a favorable balance of power in Europe and laying the groundwork for future British expansion.
Arguments for Unsuccessful Foreign Policy
Several key events and outcomes can be cited to support the claim that British foreign policy during this period was largely unsuccessful. Critics point to the failure to completely eradicate the threat posed by France. Despite the Nine Years’ War (1688-1697), French power remained formidable, and the subsequent War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714) demonstrated that the threat from France had not been fully extinguished. The war also exposed internal divisions within Britain, with a significant minority opposing the war effort, leading to political instability and weakening the government's foreign policy objectives.
Further evidence of unsuccessful foreign policy can be seen in the military setbacks experienced by the British. The defeat at Landen in 1693, the series of defeats in Spain in 1706-1707, and the stalemated situation in the Netherlands are all indicative of the limitations of British military capabilities against the French. The French navy also posed a significant threat, capturing numerous British ships and hindering trade. Despite the celebrated victory at La Hogue in 1692, the failure to effectively attack the French fleet at anchor raises questions about the overall strategic competence of the British navy.
Arguments for Successful Foreign Policy
However, a more nuanced perspective reveals that British foreign policy during this period achieved significant successes, securing strategic advantages in Europe and laying the foundation for future imperial expansion. The Nine Years’ War, though costly, successfully staved off the French threat to European stability. The strategic brilliance of the Duke of Marlborough ensured a series of decisive victories on the European mainland, culminating in the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. These victories, coupled with the naval success achieved under Admiral Rooke, established Britain as a major European power.
Furthermore, British naval power expanded British influence to the Mediterranean, securing Gibraltar and Minorca in 1704 and 1708 respectively. These strategic acquisitions significantly enhanced British naval strength and provided essential bases for maritime operations. The security of the English Channel during the wars was maintained, allowing for uninterrupted trade and communication with Europe. This ensured a stable economic foundation for Britain and contributed to its rise in global power.
The Partition Treaties of 1698 and 1700, although unsuccessful in preventing the War of the Spanish Succession, demonstrated British diplomacy on the international stage. The success in attracting foreign alliances during the War of the Spanish Succession, including the Dutch Republic, Habsburg Austria, and Portugal, is a testament to the strength of British diplomacy. This coalition secured important strategic objectives, notably the protection of Holland's western frontier and the conquest of key Spanish territories in the early years of the war (1704-1706).
The Significance of the Treaty of Utrecht
The Peace of Utrecht in 1713 represents the culmination of British foreign policy during this period. This treaty achieved many of the strategic aims of the British government. The Old Pretender was expelled from France, thus securing the Hanoverian succession. Britain gained the asiento, securing lucrative trade privileges in Spanish America. The French were forced to abandon fortresses in Flanders, reducing their military threat to the Netherlands. These clauses cemented Britain's position as a major European power and provided the foundation for its future imperial expansion.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the effectiveness of British foreign policy from 1689 to 1714 is a matter of perspective. While the period witnessed setbacks and internal divisions, it also saw significant diplomatic successes and strategic gains. The Nine Years’ War and the War of the Spanish Succession ultimately contributed to the establishment of Britain as a leading European power. The victories achieved on the battlefield, the expansion of naval power, and the successful negotiation of the Treaty of Utrecht all demonstrate the strategic brilliance of British foreign policy. Despite the challenges, the period saw Britain emerge as a major player on the world stage, setting the stage for its future dominance in global affairs.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Brief overview of British foreign policy from 1689-1714: Driven by concerns over the expansionist ambitions of Louis XIV and securing commercial interests. Mention key events and figures like the Nine Years' War, War of the Spanish Succession, William III, Marlborough.
Thesis Statement: Present a nuanced argument. While British foreign policy faced significant challenges and setbacks, ultimately it achieved some notable successes, making a definitive judgment on its overall success complex.
Arguments for Unsuccessful Foreign Policy
Military and Naval Setbacks
Nine Years' War (1688-1697):
⭐French naval successes early in the war and disruption of trade.
⭐Landen (1693) defeat demonstrated the strength of French land forces.
⭐Stalemate in the Netherlands despite significant financial and military commitment.
War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714):
⭐Early setbacks in Spain (1706-1707).
⭐Inability to decisively defeat the French fleet despite victories like La Hogue (1692).
Domestic Divisions
Financial burden of wars led to political disputes and opposition to William III and later Queen Anne's policies.
Arguments for Successful Foreign Policy
Containing French Expansion
Nine Years' War: Prevented Louis XIV from achieving a decisive victory and forced him to accept the Treaty of Ryswick.
War of the Spanish Succession: Marlborough's victories (Blenheim, Ramillies, Oudenarde) significantly weakened French power.
Securing British Interests
Naval Power and Expansion: Capture of Gibraltar and Minorca strengthened British control of the Mediterranean and trade routes.
Treaty of Utrecht (1713):
⭐Recognition of the Hanoverian succession, preventing a French-backed Stuart restoration.
⭐Gains in North America (Nova Scotia, Newfoundland) and the Asiento (slave trade) contract, bolstering the British Empire and commercial interests.
Diplomacy and Alliances
Grand Alliances: William III and later Marlborough skillfully built coalitions to counter French power.
Partition Treaties (1698, 1700): Demonstrated British diplomatic efforts to manage European power dynamics, though ultimately unsuccessful in preventing war.
Conclusion
Restate a nuanced perspective: British foreign policy from 1689-1714 was a mixed bag. Acknowledging both the significant obstacles and setbacks alongside the hard-won successes.
Weigh the arguments: Consider the relative weight of the successes (containing France, territorial gains, commercial advantages) against the costs (financial strain, domestic divisions, military defeats).
Offer a final judgment: Avoid definitively stating whether the policy was "successful" or "unsuccessful" but rather lean towards a conclusion based on the evidence presented. Perhaps argue that ultimately, British foreign policy laid the groundwork for future successes and the growth of British power in the 18th century.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Was the War of the League of Augsburg a success for England?
Answers that it was largely unsuccessful might consider that the threat from France was not destroyed by the Nine Years’ War. They might also consider that foreign policy caused serious divisions at home. They might also consider the number of ships seized by the French. They might also consider the failure of British ships to attack the French fleet in port. They might also consider the defeat at Landen in 1693. They might also consider the defeats in Spain 1706-07. They might also consider the stalemate in the Netherlands.
Answers that it was not unsuccessful might consider that the Nine Years’ War staved off the French. They might also consider that Marlborough secured a number of victories on mainland Europe. They might also consider that naval success expanded British power in the Mediterranean with the capture of Gibraltar and Minorca. They might also consider that the Channel remained secure and that Britain could trade with Europe. They might also consider the success of the Battle of La Hogue in 1692. They might also consider the Partition Treaties of 1698 and 1700. They might also consider the success in attracting foreign support during the War of Spanish Succession. They might also consider the success in securing Holland’s western frontier. They might also consider the success in Spain 1704-06. They might also consider that the Peace of Utrecht did see Britain achieve many of its aims – the Old Pretender was expelled from France, the French recognised the Hanoverian succession, gained the asiento, empire expanded, France abandoned some fortresses in Flanders.