‘Child evacuation was the most important civilian preparation for war made by the British government by September 1939.
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2022
Topic
European history in the interwar years, 1919–41
👑Complete Model Essay
‘Child evacuation was the most important civilian preparation for war made by the British government by September 1939.
Child Evacuation: The Most Important Civilian Preparation for War in Britain by September 1939?
The assertion that child evacuation was the most important civilian preparation for war made by the British government by September 1939 holds weight when considering its unprecedented nature and societal impact. However, evaluating its significance requires acknowledging other crucial preparations undertaken in anticipation of the looming conflict.
The Case for Child Evacuation
The specter of civilian bombing, particularly the harrowing reports emerging from the Spanish Civil War, cast a long shadow over British war planning. The government feared mass casualties, shattered morale, and crippling damage to infrastructure and war production. Evacuation, a novel concept compared to the First World War, aimed to mitigate these risks by relocating children from densely populated industrial cities to perceived safer rural areas, even overseas.
This undertaking's significance is amplified by its departure from previous practices and its profound social implications. It represented a direct intervention in family life, predicated on the belief that cities would face unprecedented disruption. This mass mobilization, requiring a coordinated national effort encompassing logistics, social control, and engineering, underscored the state's prioritization of war preparedness over traditional family structures. Child evacuation served as a stark reminder that modern warfare extended its reach far beyond the battlefields, impacting the entire population in a manner unparalleled even in the Great War.
Alternative Preparations and Their Significance
However, arguing that child evacuation was the most critical preparation necessitates considering other equally crucial measures. The British government, acutely aware of the impending war by the spring of 1939, drew upon the lessons learned from the First World War, leading to significant actions:
⭐Conscription, introduced in April 1939, signaled the state's recognition of the need for a large, readily available fighting force.
⭐National security measures, including the creation of the Ministry of Information for propaganda and censorship, aimed to control the flow of information and maintain public morale.
⭐Rationing plans, designed to ensure the equitable distribution of essential goods and resources, represented a significant intervention in daily life.
⭐Air raid precautions, such as blackouts and the distribution of gas masks, aimed to protect the population from anticipated air attacks.
These measures, particularly the overarching preparation for emergency powers, showcased the government's readiness to curtail individual liberties in the interest of national security, reflecting a significant expansion of state power. This raises the question of whether these overarching preparations, signifying a fundamental shift in the relationship between the state and its citizens, were ultimately more consequential than child evacuation, which, while impactful, was not universally enforced.
The Emotional and Social Impact of Evacuation
Counterbalancing this argument is the profound emotional and social impact of child evacuation. The sight of millions of children being separated from their families served as a stark visual reminder of the war's harsh realities. For many families, particularly in poorer urban areas, evacuation exposed the stark economic disparities and social divisions existing within British society. The experience of sending children away fostered a sense of shared sacrifice and national unity, further strengthening the argument for its significance.
Conclusion
While child evacuation undeniably represents a major civilian preparation for war, claiming it as the most important necessitates careful consideration. While its scale, emotional impact, and social implications are undeniable, it was one element within a broader program designed to prepare Britain for total war. Conscription, economic controls, and the expansion of state power represented equally, if not more, fundamental shifts in the relationship between the state and its citizens. Ultimately, arguing for the primacy of one preparation over another risks overlooking the complex interplay of factors that shaped Britain's home front during the Second World War.
**Sources:**
European history in the interwar years, 1919–41
**Note:*This essay does not contain any specific quotations requiring direct citations. However, it draws upon general historical knowledge and themes presented in the provided text.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the topic of child evacuation and the debate surrounding its importance as a civilian preparation for war. State your line of argument - whether you agree or disagree that it was the mostimportant preparation.
Argument in Favor: The Significance of Child Evacuation
This section will argue that child evacuation was the most important civilian preparation.
Unprecedented Scale and Impact
Discuss the sheer scale of the operation, involving millions of people and requiring extensive national effort.
Social and Psychological Impact
Analyze the profound impact of separating families and the psychological effects on both children and parents. Emphasize how this demonstrated the total nature of modern warfare.
Gap Between Urban and Rural
Explain how the evacuation highlighted the stark differences between urban poverty and rural life.
Counter-Argument: Other Vital Preparations
This section will present counter-arguments, acknowledging other crucial preparations.
Conscription and National Security
Discuss the importance of conscription in preparing the nation for war and the need for national security measures against espionage and sabotage.
Economic and Resource Control
Analyze the significance of rationing, economic controls, and the mobilization of resources for war production as fundamental preparations.
Expansion of State Power
Explain how the government's wartime powers, including control over resources and civilian life, were arguably more significant than a single policy like evacuation.
Evaluation and Conclusion
Weigh the arguments presented and offer a balanced evaluation of the importance of child evacuation in relation to other civilian preparations. Reiterate your stance on whether it was the mostimportant, providing nuanced justification.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Child evacuation was the most important civilian preparation for war made by the British government by September 1939. Evaluate this view.
Much may depend on how ‘important’ is defined. Reports of civilian bombing had alarmed British governments, especially those reported in the Spanish Civil War. It was feared that bombing would create literally millions of casualties, would destroy morale, would destroy the basic infrastructure of cities and disrupt vital war production. So quite a lot of planning went into meeting the problem. If families were concerned about their children, then this would have a major effect on both morale and production. No arrangements had been made during the First World War, but unprecedented plans for evacuation from vulnerable industrial city areas to rural areas, or even abroad, were made.
As this, unlike many of the preparations, was not based on a 1914–18 model, and involved direct intervention in family life, and assumed massive disruption to cities, then it could be seen as the most important preparation. This is because it involved large numbers of people, required an extensive national effort, a degree of social control, and engineering, to link town and country while also putting the needs of the state above normal family life. It was also the clearest indication that modern war involved the whole population in a way that even the Great War had not.
However, given that not all areas were involved and that it was not compulsory, it might be argued that measures which extended state control over the normal rights of the civilian population, were of greater or equal importance.
The war was clearly imminent from the Spring of 1939, and as British administrators and planners had the experience of the First World War to draw on. Therefore, conscription from April 1939, planning for national security measures, plans for rationing, and the provision of air raid precautions, such as blackouts, might be seen as equally or more important. There was the assumption that the state would need to wage total war, and command the resources it needed, at the expense of the normal rights of the citizens. The overarching preparation for emergency powers might be seen as more significant than the evacuation, which was a reflection of the increased role of the state.
However, the opposite case can be made. The emotional impact of child evacuation and the way that it brought home the tragic reality of modern war underlined the importance of child evacuation. As does how it involved rural areas in war, and how that brought home the gap between the poorer urban areas and many rural districts.