top of page

‘Dependence on oil was the main cause of the Gulf War of 1991.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2021

Topic

International history, 1945–92

👑Complete Model Essay

‘Dependence on oil was the main cause of the Gulf War of 1991.

Dependence on Oil: Evaluating its Role in the 1991 Gulf War

The assertion that dependence on oil was the main cause of the 1991 Gulf War holds some weight, but it represents a simplification of a complex geopolitical situation. While oil undoubtedly played a crucial role in shaping the motivations of both Saddam Hussein's Iraq and the US-led coalition, other factors such as Iraqi nationalism, regional power dynamics, and Saddam's miscalculations also contributed significantly to the conflict's outbreak.

Oil as a Motivating Factor

There is no doubt that oil was a central concern for all parties involved. Iraq, heavily indebted after the Iran-Iraq War, saw Kuwait's oil wealth as a potential solution to its economic woes. Saddam accused Kuwait of exceeding OPEC quotas, thereby driving down oil prices and hurting Iraq's revenue. He saw the occupation of Kuwait as a means to control a significant portion of the world's oil reserves, boosting Iraq's economy and enhancing its regional power.

For the United States and its allies, safeguarding the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf was paramount. The potential for Iraqi control over Kuwaiti and even Saudi Arabian oil fields posed a significant threat to global energy security. This economic concern, coupled with a desire to contain Iraqi aggression, fueled the international response to the invasion.

Beyond Oil: A Multifaceted Crisis

While oil undoubtedly played a major role, reducing the Gulf War solely to a conflict over oil ignores the historical and political complexities at play. Saddam's actions were also driven by a potent mix of Iraqi nationalism and personal ambition. His claim that Kuwait was historically part of Iraq, a consequence of British imperialism, resonated with Iraqi nationalist sentiment.

Furthermore, Saddam sought to establish himself as the leader of the Arab world. He miscalculated the international response to his invasion of Kuwait, believing that Arab nations would side with him and that the West would not intervene militarily. This misjudgment, combined with his brutal crackdown in Kuwait and the taking of foreign hostages, further galvanized international opposition.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while dependence on oil was a significant factor in the Gulf War, it was not the sole cause. Saddam's ambition to strengthen Iraq, redress perceived historical injustices, and secure regional dominance, alongside his miscalculation of global reaction, were equally crucial in driving the conflict. To view the war solely through the lens of oil is to overlook the complex interplay of historical grievances, nationalist sentiment, and personal ambition that ultimately led to war.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

​

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

​​

✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

​

✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

​​​

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Dependence on Oil as the Main Cause of the Gulf War

Introduction: Briefly introduce the Gulf War and the significance of oil as a potential cause. State your argument upfront regarding the extent to which oil dependence was the main cause.

Arguments for Oil as the Main Cause

Saddam's Economic Motivations:
Iraq's war debt to Kuwait and desire for debt relief.
Blaming Kuwait for oil overproduction and price drops.
Seeking control of Kuwaiti oil fields to boost Iraqi economy and military.

International Concerns over Oil Supply:
US and NATO fears about disruption to global oil markets.
Protection of Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil producer.
Operation Desert Shield as a direct response to potential oil threats.

Arguments Against Oil as the Sole Cause

Saddam's Political and Ideological Goals:
Historical claims over Kuwait as an integral part of Iraq.
Seeking regional dominance and challenging Western influence.
Desire to revise the regional order established after World War I.

Saddam's Miscalculations and International Pressure:
Underestimating international condemnation and sanctions.
Ineffective attempts to garner Arab support for the invasion.
Hostage-taking and human shields further isolating Iraq.

Conclusion

Summarize the multifaceted nature of the conflict: Oil played a significant role, especially for Iraq's motivations and international concerns. However, Saddam's personal ambitions, historical grievances, and miscalculations were also crucial factors. Therefore, oil dependence should be considered a major contributing factor, but not the sole cause of the Gulf War.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Dependence on oil was the main cause of the Gulf War of 1991. Evaluate this view.

Oil was an important factor for both sides. Saddam owed an enormous war debt to Kuwait following the Iran-Iraq War which Kuwait wanted repaid. Many Iraqis felt that Kuwait was ungrateful as Iraq had suffered to protect the Arab world and wanted Kuwait to dissolve the debt. Saddam also blamed Kuwait for overproduction of oil which led to a fall in prices. He asked all OPEC members to reduce oil production in order to increase the price of crude oil and give Iraq increased revenues.

However, Kuwait increased its quota by 50%. Occupying Kuwait would give him resources to rebuild his army and economy and increase his power. He also accused Kuwait of drilling into the Rumaila oil field territory over the border; this would mean that Kuwait was stealing Iraq’s oil. In early August 1990, he launched his invasion of Kuwait, took over the country and set fire to hundreds of Kuwaiti oil fields.

The UN Security Council passed Resolution 660, condemning the invasion and insisting on a withdrawal of Iraqi troops. The United States and other NATO members feared the potential threat it posed to Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil producer; they were concerned about maintaining the free flow of oil as it was necessary for their prosperity. They sent troops to Saudi Arabia to deter a possible attack and Egypt and several other Arab nations contributed forces to the coalition; this became known as Operation Desert Shield.

The United States demanded Iraq's full, unconditional withdrawal from Kuwait in return for peace, but Iraq insisted that there should be a simultaneous withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon and Israeli troops from the West Bank, Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, and southern Lebanon. On January 12, 1991, the United States Congress authorized the use of military force to drive Iraq out of Kuwait.

Saddam believed that Kuwait had no right to exist; he considered that historically Kuwait was an integral part of Iraq and it had only come into being because of British imperialism at the end of the nineteenth century. To occupy Kuwait would put right a historical wrong. He regarded Kuwait as the nineteenth province of Iraq. He also demanded that Kuwait’s border with Iraq be adjusted and Kuwait make a further large loan to Iraq.

He accused Kuwait of drilling below the border with Iraq in order to extract huge oil deposits which Iraq claimed as its own. In August 1990, Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait and overran the country in three days. Kuwait’s oil riches would augment Iraq’s power in the Middle East and help Saddam realize his ambition of becoming a regional leader.

Saddam’s misjudgment of the international situation encouraged him not to withdraw from Kuwait. The United Nations Security Council imposed complete trade sanctions on Iraq; Saddam did not expect them to be so successful. He wrongly believed that he could gain Arab support for his actions by agreeing to withdraw from Kuwait when the Israelis withdrew their forces from the West Bank and Gaza.

Saddam caused further outrage when he detained hundreds of foreigners as hostages and used some as human shields near military targets. Eisenhower had written back in 1957 that if a crisis in the Middle East threatened to cut off the western world from oil, the United States would use force. However, the United States had not intervened to save the Shah of Iran. He did not believe that the United States would act. He was driven out of Kuwait in February; a ceasefire was imposed in March.

bottom of page