‘Puritanism was a greater threat to Elizabeth than Catholicism.’ How far do you agree?
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2021
Topic
England 1547-1603: the Later Tudors
👑Complete Model Essay
‘Puritanism was a greater threat to Elizabeth than Catholicism.’ How far do you agree?
Puritanism was a greater threat to Elizabeth than Catholicism. How far do you agree?
Elizabeth I's reign was marked by the constant challenge of religious dissent, both from Catholics and Puritans. While both groups posed legitimate threats to her authority, the nature of these threats differed significantly. The question of whether Puritanism was a greater threat to Elizabeth than Catholicism is a complex one, requiring careful consideration of the specific challenges each group presented.
The Challenge of Catholicism
Catholicism, as the established religion of Europe, held a powerful position that threatened Elizabeth's claim to the throne. Her legitimacy was contested by Mary Queen of Scots, a Catholic claimant who was supported by Spain and represented a potential alternative monarch. The possibility of a Spanish invasion, as demonstrated by the attempted Armada in 1588, presented a serious military threat. Catholics were also involved in numerous plots against Elizabeth, most notably the Babington Plot which led to Mary's execution in 1587. The influx of Jesuit and seminary priests, trained to convert English people to Catholicism, further challenged Elizabeth's religious settlement and posed a threat to her authority.
However, Catholicism's threat was largely external. While there were Catholics within England, they were largely confined to the nobility and gentry, and their numbers were limited compared to those of Puritans. The Catholic threat was also largely contained by Elizabeth's effective security measures, including the creation of a powerful spy network and the execution of key conspirators. While Catholicism posed a serious threat, its impact on Elizabeth's rule was largely indirect and limited to specific events.
The Challenge of Puritanism
Puritanism, on the other hand, was a more pervasive and insidious threat. Puritans, although not a unified group, shared a desire for further religious reform and a rejection of the Elizabethan religious settlement. This challenge was both ideological and practical. In terms of numbers, Puritans were significantly more numerous than Catholics, with support stretching across various social classes, including the gentry, nobility, and even some priests. Furthermore, Puritan dissent was not simply confined to the realm of theological debate but actively challenged the legitimacy of Elizabeth's authority.
Puritans were vocal in their criticism of the Church of England, arguing for greater simplicity in worship and a more reformed theology. They questioned the authority of bishops and the role of the monarch in religious matters, directly challenging Elizabeth's position as Supreme Governor of the Church. This constant pressure led to some concessions from Elizabeth, such as the inclusion of some Puritan reforms in the Thirty-Nine Articles. However, Puritans continued to agitate for further change, threatening to undermine Elizabeth's religious settlement and erode her authority.
The popularity of prophesyings, gatherings where Puritans discussed and interpreted scripture, further challenged Elizabeth's control. These unregulated and often political events, held outside the official structure of the Church, spread Puritan ideas and undermined the legitimacy of Elizabeth's chosen religious path. The persistence of Puritan dissent throughout Elizabeth's reign posed a constant challenge to her authority and created a sense of uncertainty and unrest within the realm.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both Catholicism and Puritanism posed threats to Elizabeth's reign, but their nature differed significantly. While Catholicism was a dangerous external threat that manifested in specific events like the Armada and plots against Elizabeth, it was largely contained by her security measures and limited in its impact on the day-to-day governance of England. Puritanism, on the other hand, presented a more pervasive and enduring challenge, stemming from its larger numbers, its consistent criticism of the religious settlement, and its ability to mobilize support across various social classes. The constant pressure exerted by Puritans, both through their religious reforms and their political agitation, posed a greater threat to Elizabeth's authority and legitimacy over the long term.
Therefore, while it is difficult to definitively state that Puritanism was a greater threat than Catholicism, the evidence suggests that the pervasive nature of Puritan dissent and its ability to constantly challenge Elizabeth's religious settlement and authority makes it a stronger contender for being the more significant threat.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Puritanism was a greater threat to Elizabeth than Catholicism.’ How far do you agree?
Introduction
Briefly outline the religious situation in England at Elizabeth's accession. Mention the previous instability under Edward and Mary. State your line of argument. E.g., While both Puritanism and Catholicism presented challenges, [State which you deem was the bigger threat and why, briefly].
Body Paragraph 1: The Puritan Threat - Numbers, Ideology, and Challenges
Topic sentence: Begin by stating that Puritanism posed a significant threat due to its growing popularity and challenge to the Elizabethan Settlement.
Discuss the size and spread of Puritanism: More numerous than Catholics, even if some were moderate. Explain how their ideology clashed with Elizabeth's via the Royal Supremacy and her desire for a 'broad church.'
Provide examples of Puritan challenges: Mention the Vestments Controversy, demands for further reform in Parliament, and the publication of dissenting works.
Concessions and Support: Acknowledge that Elizabeth had to make some concessions, like the slightly modified Thirty-Nine Articles. Note Puritan influence among gentry and some clergy appointments.
Prophecyings: Explain how these gatherings were outside Elizabeth's control, undermined the established church, and fueled radical ideas.
Body Paragraph 2: The Catholic Threat - Foreign Support, Plots, and Rebellion
Topic Sentence: Transition by acknowledging that Catholicism, while less widespread, posed a serious threat due to its connection to foreign powers and plots against Elizabeth.
Foreign Support: Explain the Catholic reliance on Spain (mention Philip II's ambitions), culminating in the Armada. This threat was military and ideological (Catholicism as a rival European power).
Mary, Queen of Scots: Discuss her as a focal point for Catholic plots and rebellion. Explain the threat of an alternative monarch and the various conspiracies (e.g., the Ridolfi Plot) that aimed to put her on the throne.
Northern Rebellion: Describe this major uprising as an example of Catholic discontent. Highlight the involvement of nobles, but also its ultimate failure, showing limitations of Catholic support within England.
Priests and Recusancy: Mention the work of Jesuit and seminary priests, but also note the dangers they faced and the increasing number of Catholics willing to compromise with the Elizabethan regime.
Body Paragraph 3: Weighing the Threats - Elizabeth's Responses and Long-Term Impact
Topic Sentence: This paragraph should synthesize the arguments and move towards your final judgment. Consider beginning with, "While both religious groups presented challenges..."
Elizabeth's Actions: Compare how Elizabeth dealt with each threat. Was she more concerned with Puritan dissent or Catholic plots? Discuss laws, persecutions, and the use of propaganda.
Long-Term Impact: Which threat had a more lasting impact? Consider the growth of Puritanism and its role in future conflicts (e.g., the English Civil War). Did Elizabeth successfully neutralize the Catholic danger?
Nuance: It is valid to argue that both were significant, but perhaps in different ways (internal vs. external threat).
Conclusion
Reiterate your argument: Briefly restate which group you believe posed the larger threat and why, making sure it aligns with the evidence presented.
Offer a final thought: Perhaps consider the complexity of the situation or the long-term consequences of Elizabeth's choices.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Puritanism and Catholicism: Threats to Elizabeth I's Reign
Both Puritanism and Catholicism posed a threat to Elizabeth I's reign. On the one hand, Puritanism posed a greater threat in terms of numbers. There were more Puritans than Catholics, even if some were moderate. Puritans also challenged the religious settlement throughout Elizabeth's reign and this challenged the legitimacy of her rule. They were also able to force some concessions from Elizabeth on the Thirty-Nine Articles. Puritans also had some support from the gentry and nobility and some were appointed to be priests. Finally, the popularity of prophesyings, which were outside the control of Elizabeth, further undermined her authority and legitimacy.
On the other hand, Catholicism also posed a significant threat. Catholics received support from Spain, and this was evident in the attempted invasion of the Armada. England also faced the threat of an alternative Catholic monarch, Mary Queen of Scots, until 1587. The number of Catholic plots centered around Mary Queen of Scots also contributed to the threat posed by Catholicism. Finally, the rising of the Northern Earls was a major threat to Elizabeth's reign. The Jesuit and seminary priests also represented a significant threat to Elizabeth's reign.