top of page

‘The Iran-Iraq War was the main reason for tension in the Gulf in 1990.’
How far do you agree with this statement?
Explain your answer.

Level

GCSE

Year Examined

2022

Topic

Conflict and tension in the Gulf and Afghanistan, 1990-2009

👑Complete Model Essay

‘The Iran-Iraq War was the main reason for tension in the Gulf in 1990.’
How far do you agree with this statement?
Explain your answer.

The Iran-Iraq War: Cause or Symptom of Gulf Tensions in 1990?

Introduction:
The Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) inflicted immense suffering and instability upon the Gulf region. However, attributing the tensions of 1990 solely to this conflict presents an incomplete picture. This essay argues that while the war undoubtedly exacerbated existing tensions, it was ultimately a symptom of deeper, pre-existing issues that had long plagued the region. Analysing historical context, ideological clashes, power dynamics, and external influences will demonstrate how the Iran-Iraq War itself stemmed from these underlying tensions rather than being their primary cause.

Body Paragraph 1: Historical Grievances and Regional Rivalries

Point: Tensions in the Gulf predate the war, rooted in historical grievances and power struggles that fueled mutual distrust and animosity.
Evidence:
- The Shatt al-Arab waterway, a crucial border between Iran and Iraq, remained a source of contention, with both claiming sovereignty and access rights.
- Centuries-old rivalry between Persia (Iran) and the Arab world, amplified by religious and cultural differences, created a foundation of suspicion.
- The legacy of British imperialism, including the arbitrary drawing of borders in the region, left a legacy of unresolved territorial disputes and political instability.

Body Paragraph 2: Ideological Clashes and the Rise of Revolutionary Iran

Point: The 1979 Iranian Revolution dramatically shifted the regional landscape, intensifying existing ideological clashes and exacerbating tensions.
Evidence:
- Ayatollah Khomeini's vision of revolutionary Shia Islam challenged the existing order in the Gulf, particularly alarming Sunni-majority Arab states.
- Saddam Hussein, fearing the spread of the revolution and seeking to capitalise on regional anxieties, framed the conflict with Iran as a defense of Arab and Sunni interests.
- This ideological struggle transformed the war into a proxy conflict, with various regional and international actors supporting either side, further entangling the Gulf in a web of competing interests.

Body Paragraph 3: Power Dynamics and the Struggle for Regional Hegemony

Point: The Iran-Iraq War became entangled with the ambitions of both nations to assert regional dominance, further fueling conflict and instability.
Evidence:
- Saddam Hussein harbored ambitions of establishing Iraq as the leading power in the Gulf, exploiting the perceived weakness of Iran in the wake of its revolution to launch his 1980 invasion.
- Iran, under Khomeini, sought to export its Islamic revolution and counter Western influence in the region, further raising alarm amongst its neighbours.
- Control over oil resources, crucial to both nations' economies and global energy markets, became a central point of contention and a driving force behind the conflict.

Body Paragraph 4: The Role of External Actors and Superpower Interests

Point: External powers, particularly the United States, played a significant role in shaping the dynamics of the Gulf, often exacerbating existing tensions for their own strategic interests.
Evidence:
- The US, wary of Iran's revolutionary government, provided substantial support to Iraq during the war, including intelligence sharing and military aid.
- The Iran-Contra affair, in which the US secretly sold arms to Iran despite an embargo, highlighted the complex and often contradictory nature of Western involvement in the region.
- The US's unwavering support for Israel, perceived as a threat by many Arab states, further inflamed regional tensions and fostered anti-Western sentiment, indirectly contributing to the escalation of the Iran-Iraq War.

Conclusion:

While the Iran-Iraq War undeniably amplified and inflamed tensions in the Gulf, attributing the events of 1990 solely to this conflict presents an overly simplistic narrative. The war itself emerged from a complex web of pre-existing issues: historical grievances, ideological clashes, power struggles, and manipulative external actors. By 1990, the Gulf region remained deeply scarred by the war's legacy, with heightened mistrust, militarisation, and unresolved disputes. The Iran-Iraq War, therefore, should be viewed as a devastating symptom of deeper-rooted problems, a tragic culmination of long-simmering tensions that continued to plague the Gulf region long after the fighting ceased.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

The Iran-Iraq War: Cause or Symptom of Gulf Tensions in 1990?

Introduction:
The Iran-Iraq War, a brutal and costly conflict lasting from 1980 to 1988, undoubtedly cast a long shadow over the Gulf region. This essay will argue that while the war significantly exacerbated tensions, it was ultimately a symptom of deeper, pre-existing issues that had plagued the region for decades. By examining the historical context, the role of religious and political ideologies, and the influence of external powers, this essay aims to demonstrate that the Iran-Iraq War was a manifestation of long-standing tensions rather than their primary cause.

Body Paragraph 1: Pre-Existing Tensions and Historical Grievances

Point: The roots of tension in the Gulf predate the Iran-Iraq War, stemming from historical grievances and power struggles.
Evidence:
- Longstanding territorial disputes, such as the Shatt al-Arab waterway.
- Historical rivalry between Persia (Iran) and Arab states.
- British imperial legacy and the creation of artificial borders.

Body Paragraph 2: Religious and Ideological Divide

Point: The war exacerbated the existing religious divide between the Sunni-majority Arab world and Shia-majority Iran, contributing to sectarian tensions.
Evidence:
- The 1979 Iranian Revolution and the rise of Ayatollah Khomeini's revolutionary Shia Islam.
- Saddam Hussein's exploitation of Sunni fears to rally support for the war.
- The conflict's transformation into a proxy war, with each side receiving support from different regional and international actors.

Body Paragraph 3: Power Dynamics and Regional Ambitions

Point: Both Iran and Iraq harbored regional ambitions that fueled the conflict and contributed to instability in the Gulf.
Evidence:
- Saddam Hussein's desire to establish Iraq as the dominant power in the Gulf.
- Iran's revolutionary government's aim to export its Islamic revolution.
- The war as a struggle for regional hegemony and control over oil resources.

Body Paragraph 4: External Influence and the Role of the West

Point: Western powers, particularly the United States, played a significant role in fueling tensions and exacerbating the conflict.
Evidence:
- US support for Iraq during the war, including providing intelligence and military aid.
- The Iran-Contra affair and the US's covert arms sales to Iran.
- The US's close relationship with Israel, which was perceived as a threat by many Arab states.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the Iran-Iraq War significantly heightened tensions in the Gulf, it was ultimately a symptom rather than the root cause. The conflict was fueled by a complex interplay of historical grievances, religious and ideological divisions, regional ambitions, and external interference. The war's legacy continued to cast a shadow over the region long after its conclusion, highlighting the deep-seated nature of the tensions that had plagued the Gulf for decades.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

The Iran-Iraq War: A Symptom of Deeper Tensions

The Iran-Iraq war was a symptom rather than the cause of tensions. The war reflected the religious split between hostile Sunni and Shia states; both sides were led by regimes which had ambitions for status and power given the Iranian Revolution and Saddam’s arrogant and aggressive personality. Further instability was caused by Western interests, and the demand for oil. US behaviour fuelled suspicion across the Arab world, supporting Saddam and Israel at the same time. The war reflected long term tensions which explain its length and bitterness.

bottom of page