top of page

Which of the following was a greater threat to the Bolsheviks by 1921? (i) Resentment towards ‘war communism’ (ii) The Kronstadt Rising Explain your answer with reference to both (i) and (ii).

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2021

Topic

Russia 1894-1941

👑Complete Model Essay

Which of the following was a greater threat to the Bolsheviks by 1921? (i) Resentment towards ‘war communism’ (ii) The Kronstadt Rising Explain your answer with reference to both (i) and (ii).

Which was a greater threat to the Bolsheviks by 1921: War Communism or the Kronstadt Rising?

By 1921, the Bolshevik government faced a multitude of challenges, with discontent brewing both within the urban working class and the rural peasantry. This essay will argue that while the Kronstadt Rising (1921) posed a significant and immediate threat to the Bolsheviks, the greater danger stemmed from the widespread resentment towards War Communism. This resentment, fuelled by economic hardship and political repression, deeply eroded the Bolsheviks' support base and ultimately forced them to abandon their wartime economic policy.

The Threat of War Communism

War Communism, implemented in 1918, was a harsh economic policy designed to ensure the survival of the Bolsheviks during the Russian Civil War. It saw the nationalization of industry, forced requisition of grain from peasants, and the implementation of strict rationing in the cities. While effective in securing food supplies for the Red Army and urban workers, this brutal approach had a devastating impact on the population.

Firstly, War Communism led to widespread economic hardship, particularly in the cities. The strict rationing system meant that urban workers experienced severe food shortages, leading to malnutrition and starvation. This caused a sharp decline in Bolshevik support, as the very class that had initially embraced the revolution found themselves struggling to survive. The Bolsheviks lost their urban base, a major blow to their authority.

Secondly, the forced requisition of grain from peasants led to widespread famine in 1921. Peasants, who had already been alienated by the Bolsheviks' land reforms, were further enraged by the seizure of their crops. In response, they began to sabotage production, planting less grain to avoid further confiscations. This further exacerbated the food shortages, leading to the deaths of millions and increasing resentment towards the Bolsheviks.

Thirdly, the Bolshevik response to peasant rebellion was brutal and uncompromising. The Tambov Uprising (1920-1921), a peasant revolt against the forced requisitioning of grain, was only quelled after months of intense fighting and widespread atrocities. This further intensified peasant resentment and demonstrated the oppressive nature of the Bolshevik regime.

It is important to note that War Communism was initially justified as a necessary evil to ensure the survival of the Bolshevik government during a brutal civil war. However, the long-term consequences of this policy, including widespread poverty, famine, and resentment, ultimately proved to be a far greater threat to the Bolsheviks than the Kronstadt uprising.

The Kronstadt Rising

The Kronstadt Rising, a revolt by sailors and workers in March 1921, poses a significant threat to the Bolsheviks for a number of reasons. The rebels, who had previously been lauded as heroes of the Revolution, demanded freedom of speech, the right to form independent trade unions, and an end to food requisitioning. This demonstrated the deep disillusionment with Bolshevik rule amongst the workers and made clear that the upheaval was not limited to the peasants.

Firstly, the revolt originated in Kronstadt, a strategically vital location close to Petrograd, the Bolshevik capital. This made the uprising a serious threat, as it had the potential to disrupt the Bolshevik government's operations and inspire further revolts across the country.

Secondly, the timing of the uprising coincided with the Tenth Party Plenum, where the Bolsheviks were debating the future of War Communism. This embarrassing rebellion undermined their authority and exposed the internal divisions within the party.

However, the Kronstadt uprising was relatively small and poorly organized. Although significant, it was ultimately crushed by an overwhelming Red Army force, showcasing the Bolsheviks' military strength and capacity to suppress dissent.

Furthermore, the rebels' demands were ultimately rejected by Lenin, demonstrating that the Bolsheviks were still willing to use force to maintain their grip on power. This suggests that although the uprising was a serious threat, it did not pose a fundamental challenge to the Bolsheviks' authority.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Kronstadt Rising was a significant threat to the Bolsheviks, it was ultimately a short-lived and contained rebellion. The true danger stemmed from the widespread resentment towards War Communism. This resentment, fuelled by economic hardship, political repression, and the famine of 1921, undermined the Bolsheviks' authority and ultimately forced them to abandon their wartime economic policy in favor of the New Economic Policy (NEP). This shift, driven by the deep-seated anxieties arising from War Communism, ultimately ensured the survival of the Bolshevik regime.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
Thesis Statement: While resentment towards War Communism posed a significant challenge to the Bolsheviks by 1921, the Kronstadt Rising presented a more immediate and dangerous threat due to its symbolic significance, strategic timing, and challenge to the Bolsheviks' legitimacy.

Body Paragraph 1: Resentment towards War Communism
Topic Sentence: War Communism, while crucial for the Bolsheviks' survival during the Civil War, generated widespread resentment among various segments of society.

⭐Harsh discipline and long working hours alienated urban workers, eroding Bolshevik support in key areas.
⭐Forced grain requisitioning led to peasant uprisings (e.g., Tambov) and widespread famine, causing immense suffering and resentment.
⭐However, the Cheka and Red Army's use of terror helped contain much of the discontent, mitigating the immediate threat.


Body Paragraph 2: The Kronstadt Rising
Topic Sentence: The Kronstadt Rising, though ultimately crushed, posed a more acute threat due to its timing, participants, and challenge to Bolshevik legitimacy.

⭐The uprising involved sailors, once considered the "pride and joy of the Revolution," highlighting the erosion of support among core Bolshevik constituencies.
⭐Its proximity to Petrograd and occurrence during the Tenth Party Congress created a sense of vulnerability and embarrassment for the Bolsheviks.
⭐The sailors' demands, while primarily focused on improving living conditions, also called for political reforms, directly challenging Bolshevik authority.


Body Paragraph 3: Comparing the Threats
Topic Sentence: While both resentment towards War Communism and the Kronstadt Rising endangered the Bolsheviks, the latter represented a more immediate and existential crisis.

⭐Resentment towards War Communism was widespread but diffuse, whereas the Kronstadt Rising was a concentrated and organized challenge.
⭐The Kronstadt Rising forced the Bolsheviks to confront the possibility of losing support among their most dedicated followers, shaking their confidence and legitimacy.
⭐The uprising's timing, location, and symbolism amplified its impact, turning it into a pivotal moment that exposed the fragility of Bolshevik rule.


Conclusion
Restatement of Thesis: While resentment towards War Communism undoubtedly posed a challenge, the Kronstadt Rising constituted a greater threat to the Bolsheviks by 1921. Its timing, participants, and challenge to Bolshevik legitimacy shook the regime to its core, forcing them to confront the potential loss of their most dedicated supporters.
Final Thought: The Kronstadt Rising served as a stark warning to the Bolsheviks, highlighting the need to address popular discontent and adapt their policies to maintain control. This ultimately paved the way for the introduction of the New Economic Policy, marking a significant shift in Bolshevik strategy.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Dealing with Resentment towards War Communism
Answers might argue that the harsh discipline and long working hours introduced by War Communism saw Bolshevik support in the cities decline rapidly; a major threat since most Bolshevik popularity lay in urban areas. Answers might argue that peasants retaliating to the forced requisition of grain by not planting crops had led to widespread famine by 1921 that led to the deaths of millions and caused widespread resent towards the Bolsheviks. Answers might argue that the harsh Bolshevik response to peasant resistance during War Communism led to widespread rural unrest like the Tambov uprising which took months to suppress. Answers might refer to War Communism having been a necessary measure to ensure the survival of the Bolsheviks by maintaining grain supplies to the army and cities. Answers might consider that the widespread use of terror by the Cheka and Red Army was able to control much of the resentment to War Communism and so reduce its threat.

Dealing with the Kronstadt Rising
Answers might argue that coming as it did from demands issued by workers it was a threat to the Bolsheviks as it showed discontent from their natural supporters. Answers might argue that as the Kronstadt sailors had been previously labelled the ‘pride and joy of the Revolution’ it demonstrated how much support the Bolsheviks had lost by 1921. Answers might argue that the location and timing of the uprising – close to Petrograd and at the time of the Tenth plenum – was a threat as it embarrassed the Bolsheviks. Answers might refer to the relatively small nature of the uprising and the rejection of all its political demands demonstrates the limited nature of the threat. Answers might consider that the uprising was rapidly crushed by an overwhelming Red Army force, showing that the Bolsheviks were able to suppress the threat.

bottom of page