top of page

Developments in policing in the period 1750-1900 were effective.' How far do you agree with this statement?

Level

GCSE

Year Examined

2021

Topic

World History

👑Complete Model Essay

Developments in policing in the period 1750-1900 were effective.' How far do you agree with this statement?

Developments in Policing 1750-1900

Question: ‘Developments in policing in the period 1750-1900 were effective.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Introduction:

Prior to 1750, England lacked any formal, organized police force. Law enforcement relied on a patchwork system of parish constables, watchmen, and citizen involvement. This often proved ineffective in tackling crime, particularly in rapidly growing urban areas. This essay will argue that while developments in policing between 1750 and 1900 significantly improved the efficacy of law enforcement, arguing for absolute effectiveness would be misleading. This period saw the establishment of professional police forces and embraced technological advancements, yet persistent challenges such as corruption and limited resources continued to hamper their overall effectiveness.

Arguments FOR effectiveness:

Point 1: Introduction of professional police forces.

⭐The Metropolitan Police Act of 1829 marked a turning point. It led to the formation of the Metropolitan Police in London, a structured and organized force modeled on Sir Robert Peel's principles of preventative policing.
⭐This shift from informal systems to a dedicated force meant greater visibility, a more proactive approach to crime prevention, and the development of standardized procedures. While precise crime statistics from this era are debated, the perceived increase in public safety and the gradual decline in certain types of crime towards the latter half of the century suggest a positive impact of the new police forces.
⭐However, it's crucial to acknowledge the "teething problems" these early forces faced. Public suspicion of a centralized police force, internal issues of corruption, and limited resources meant effectiveness was not immediate or universal.


Point 2: Technological and organizational advancements.

⭐The adoption of the telegraph revolutionized communication within police forces, allowing for faster response times and better coordination between different units.
⭐Advancements in record-keeping, including the use of photography and fingerprinting towards the end of the century, greatly improved identification and investigation techniques.
⭐The formation of dedicated detective branches within police forces, such as the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in 1878, led to a more specialized and systematic approach to solving complex crimes. For instance, while ultimately unsuccessful in apprehending the perpetrator, the investigation into Jack the Ripper utilized new forensic techniques and highlighted the evolving capabilities of police forces.


Arguments AGAINST effectiveness (or limitations):

Point 3: Persistent challenges and limitations of policing in this era.

⭐Corruption within police forces remained a significant issue. Bribery, brutality, and connections with criminal gangs undermined public trust and hindered effective law enforcement. The case of Inspector Charles Cork in 1878, a high-ranking officer convicted of corruption, demonstrated that this problem extended to the highest levels of the force.
⭐ Rapid industrialization and urbanization created significant social problems that overwhelmed even the new police forces. Poverty, overcrowding, and a lack of social support systems contributed to crime rates that outpaced police resources in many urban centers.
⭐Limited resources and manpower continued to plague policing efforts. Even with the establishment of professional forces, keeping up with the demands of a rapidly changing society proved a constant challenge. This was particularly evident in poorer neighborhoods, which often remained underserved and vulnerable to crime.


Comparison Point:

Point 4: Examining policing before 1750.

⭐Before 1750, the reliance on informal systems like parish constables and the "hue and cry" placed the burden of law enforcement largely on citizens themselves.
⭐ This system was inadequate for dealing with serious or organized crime. The developments in the 1750-1900 period, despite their limitations, represent a significant step forward. The establishment of dedicated forces with at least some level of training and organization, coupled with the adoption of new technologies, provided a foundation for modern policing.


Conclusion:

To conclude, it is clear that the developments in policing between 1750 and 1900 were significant and did improve the effectiveness of law enforcement to a considerable extent. The shift from informal systems to professional forces, coupled with technological and organizational advancements, brought about a more structured, proactive, and better-equipped approach to tackling crime. However, it is crucial to recognize the persistent challenges that remained. Corruption, inadequate resources, and the overwhelming social problems of the era meant that effectiveness was not absolute. While these developments laid the groundwork for modern policing, the journey toward a truly effective and equitable system was still far from complete in 1900.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Essay Plan: Developments in Policing 1750-1900

Question: ‘Developments in policing in the period 1750-1900 were effective.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Introduction:

Briefly introduce the state of policing before 1750 (e.g., reliance on constables, watchmen, limited formal systems). State your overall stance on the question - do you agree or disagree that developments were effective? Briefly outline the main points your essay will cover.

Main Body:

Arguments FOR effectiveness:

Point 1: Introduction of professional police forces (e.g., Metropolitan Police Act 1829).

⭐Explain the significance of this change - shift from informal to organized, structured force.
⭐Use specific examples: Peel's principles, impact on crime rates (if data allows), changes in public perception of safety.
⭐Consider counterarguments: Were these early forces truly effective, or were there teething problems?


Point 2: Technological and organizational advancements.

⭐Developments: Communication (telegraph), record-keeping, detective branches.
⭐Explain how these improved effectiveness: Better communication, investigation, and crime solving.
⭐Examples: Specific cases where new technologies were crucial, e.g., Jack the Ripper investigation (even if not entirely successful).


Arguments AGAINST effectiveness (or limitations):

Point 3: Persistent challenges and limitations of policing in this era.

⭐ Corruption within police forces: Examples and impact on public trust.
⭐ Social issues: Poverty, urbanization - did they hinder policing efforts despite improvements?
⭐ Limited resources, manpower: Could even organized forces keep up with growing urban centers?


Comparison Point:

Point 4: Examining policing in a different time period (briefly).

⭐ Choose a period: EITHER before 1750 (e.g., medieval period) OR after 1900 (e.g., early 20th century).
⭐ Compare and contrast: How do the challenges and successes of policing in your chosen period compare to the 1750-1900 era?
⭐ This reinforces your argument by providing historical context.


Conclusion:

Summarize your main points. Reiterate your stance: To what extent DO you agree that developments were effective? Acknowledge that effectiveness was not absolute - there were both positive changes AND ongoing challenges.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Crime Rates in Pre-Industrial Britain (1500-1750)
Answers may be awarded some marks at Level 1 if they demonstrate any knowledge of crime rates in the period 1500-1750, economic problems or any other factor. It is possible to reach the highest marks either by agreeing or disagreeing or anywhere between, providing the response matches the level description. BUT, to achieve the two highest levels, answers must consider at least one period outside industrial Britain 1750-1900, even if the response goes on to argue that the most important changes took place between 1750-1900. Answers are most likely to show understanding of the second order concepts of change, continuity and significance but reward appropriate understanding of any other second order concept.

Arguments for Continuity in Law Enforcement
Grounds for agreeing include:

⭐There was still no police force so the major aspects of law enforcement fell to the citizens.
⭐These citizens were very important in the early modern period as they were often called on to help in other ways. For example, local people were usually relied upon to give evidence against the accused in witchcraft trials, and crimes would normally only be investigated once the victim or neighbours began the process themselves.
⭐Individual communities enforced the law across the country.
⭐The constable still raised the hue and cry.
⭐Law enforcement officers were often rich and they had to do the job unpaid and untrained for one or two years.
⭐There was still a range of different courts to deal with different types of crime. The assizes dealt with serious offences, known as ‘capital offences’, such as murder, manslaughter, witchcraft and rape. These crimes were considered to be very serious and therefore they were punished very harshly by death. JPs dealt with more petty crimes.

bottom of page