top of page

Assess the aims of Soviet Foreign Policy in the period 1924–41.

Level

A Level

Year Examined

2022

Topic

European history in the interwar years, 1919–41

👑Complete Model Essay

Assess the aims of Soviet Foreign Policy in the period 1924–41.

Soviet Foreign Policy (1924–1941)

The Soviet Union's foreign policy from 1924 to 1941 was characterized by a constant tension between ideological aspirations and pragmatic considerations. While the Bolsheviks, under Lenin and later Stalin, remained committed to the ultimate goal of global revolution and the demise of capitalism, the practicalities of governing a fledgling socialist state in a hostile world necessitated a more nuanced approach.

Socialism in One Country: Following the failures of communist uprisings in Europe after World War I, coupled with the USSR's own internal weakness and the need to build a socialist economy, Stalin's doctrine of "Socialism in One Country" took hold. This pragmatic approach prioritized the security and development of the Soviet Union itself. A key element of this was the need to avoid international isolation and secure its borders. This led to a willingness to engage with capitalist powers, exemplified by the Treaty of Rapallo with Germany in 1922, which normalized relations and provided economic benefits. Similarly, trade agreements, such as the Anglo-Soviet trade agreement of 1924, were pursued for their economic advantages, even with ideologically opposed nations like Great Britain. This pragmatic approach also extended to relations with Nationalist China, demonstrating that ideological compatibility was subordinate to strategic considerations.

The Rise of Fascism and Shifting Priorities: The emergence of fascist regimes in Italy and Germany during the 1930s presented a new threat to the Soviet Union, forcing a reevaluation of its foreign policy. The Comintern's promotion of "United Fronts" with left-wing parties against fascism, championed by Litvinov, yielded mixed results. While it had some success, such as the Popular Front government in France (1936), it also led to increased international suspicion of Soviet intentions. The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), where the USSR provided support to the Republicans, further fueled fears of Soviet-backed communist expansion, playing into the hands of fascist propaganda.

The Nazi-Soviet Pact and Realpolitik: With the failure to forge lasting alliances with the Western democracies and the growing threat from Nazi Germany, Stalin made a dramatic foreign policy shift. The Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939, a non-aggression pact with Hitler, stands as a stark example of realpolitik trumping ideology. This pact served several Soviet aims. Firstly, it provided a temporary respite from war with Germany, buying time for Soviet rearmament. Secondly, it allowed Stalin to regain territory lost after World War I, expanding Soviet borders westward into Poland and the Baltic states. This move aimed to create a buffer zone against potential German aggression. However, the pact also came at a heavy moral cost, signaling a willingness to abandon ideological allies, as evidenced by the handing over of German communists who had sought refuge in the USSR to the Nazi regime.

Conclusion
In conclusion, Soviet foreign policy between 1924 and 1941 was driven by a complex interplay of factors. While the ultimate goal of global revolution remained a distant aspiration, the immediate concerns of securing the Soviet state and promoting its interests took precedence. The shifts from pragmatic engagement with capitalist powers to attempts at building anti-fascist alliances and ultimately to the cynical realpolitik of the Nazi-Soviet Pact demonstrate the adaptability, and ruthlessness, of Soviet foreign policy in the face of a rapidly changing international environment. The Soviet Union under Stalin proved willing to compromise its ideological principles in the name of national security and self-preservation. The legacy of this period continues to shape our understanding of Soviet actions in the decades that followed.


Bibliography

Lynch, Robert. Stalin and Soviet Foreign Policy, 1928–1941. Indiana University Press, 2019.

Roberts, Geoffrey. The Soviet Union and the Origins of the Second World War. Routledge, 2018.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Outline: Assessing the Aims of Soviet Foreign Policy (1924-1941)

This essay will analyze the shifting aims of Soviet foreign policy during the period between 1924 and 1941, focusing on the tension between promoting world revolution and securing the Soviet Union’s practical needs.

I. The Emphasis on Security and Economic Development

This section will discuss the emergence of Stalin’s “socialism in one country” doctrine as a practical response to:


⭐The failures of revolutionary movements after World War I.
⭐The need to develop the USSR’s industrial base and proletariat.
⭐The necessity to secure the Soviet Union from invasion and intervention.


The essay will then examine how these aims were reflected in Soviet foreign policy through:


⭐Building relations with European powers through treaties like Rapallo and trade agreements with Britain.
⭐Establishing diplomatic relations with regimes hostile to Communism, like Nationalist China.
⭐Limited support for revolutionary groups abroad.


II. The Rise of Fascism and the Shifting Landscape

This section will analyze how the rise of right-wing dictatorships in Europe significantly altered the Soviet Union’s strategic context. The essay will explore:


⭐The dangers of isolation in the face of growing aggression.
⭐The limited success of the “Popular Front” policy, which attempted to unite with left-wing groups in Europe.
⭐The role of the Spanish Civil War in exacerbating tensions with the West and feeding into Fascist propaganda.
⭐The appointment of Molotov as Foreign Minister and the shift towards prioritizing security above all else.


III. The Nazi-Soviet Pact and the Pursuit of Security

This section will delve into the key turning point of the Nazi-Soviet Pact, examining:


⭐The primary goal of securing the Soviet Union from a rapidly rearming Germany.
⭐The failed attempts to improve relations with the Western democracies.
⭐The strategic benefits of the pact, including the overturning of the Versailles Treaty and the expansion of Soviet territory.
⭐The realization of the aim to regain lost territory and establish a buffer against invasion.


IV. The Contradictions and Limitations of Soviet Foreign Policy

This section will analyze the inherent contradictions within Soviet foreign policy, specifically:


⭐The limited success of the “Popular Front” strategy in establishing Soviet domination over leftist parties.
⭐The lingering ambition of promoting worldwide ideological change through covert activities.
⭐The rejection of this ideological aim in 1939 when exiled German communists were handed over to Hitler.
⭐The ultimate dominance of realpolitik over ideological considerations.


V. Conclusion: The Shifting Aims and Enduring Priorities

The essay will conclude by assessing whether Soviet foreign policy aims changed fundamentally over the period, or if security and the pursuit of national interests remained the overarching priorities. It will highlight the key tension between the promotion of world revolution and the practical needs of the Soviet state.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Assess the Aims of Soviet Foreign Policy in the Period 1924–41.

The tension in Soviet policy was between the promotion of world revolution and the undermining of capitalism and the practical needs of the USSR for security from invasion and outside intervention while creating a socialist economy and society. Stalin’s policy of socialism in one country was based on a realistic estimate of the state of the USSR’s military resources and the failures of revolutionary movements after the First World War, together with the need to create enough industry to develop the proletariat in whose name the Bolsheviks had taken power.

Thus, it was important to establish what links were possible with other European powers through arrangements like those established with Germany in the Treaty of Rapallo and with trade agreements such as made with Britain in 1924. Also, this meant establishing relations even with regimes hostile to Communism such as Nationalist China and not giving much support to destabilising revolutionary groups despite the ideological opposition. The rise of the right-wing dictators changed the situation and made isolation dangerous, but the promotion of united fronts with left-wing groups in Europe promoted by Litvinov was problematic in terms of results. Intervention in Spain caused unrest and fed into the Fascist propaganda machine of a Soviet threat. In France the Popular Front did not secure a very strong alliance in 1935, but this was enough to intensify isolation and Soviet foreign policy changed course with the appointment of Molotov.

The primary aim was to increase security against a rapidly rearming Germany with stated aims of colonizing Russian territory. Better relations with the democracies proved impossible so a volte face in terms of the Nazi-Soviet pact was made. This led to the fulfillment of an aim to overturn the isolation established by the cordon sanitaire of Versailles and to regain lost territory which would act as an effective defensive buffer in the form of Eastern Poland and the Baltic States. So, a clear aim was to regain the land and power lost as a result of the Treaty of Brest Litovsk and the hostility of the victors of World War I to the new Soviet state.

The aim of establishing Soviet domination of the leftist political parties through a Popular Front had not proved so successful. The aim of bringing about worldwide ideological change remained more a pious hope than a guide to actual policy, pursued by covert underground activities rather than a clear and open foreign policy and specifically rejected in 1939 when exiled German communists were handed over to Hitler and a pact linking the Communist state to its most bitter ideological foe for reasons of realpolitik was adopted. It could be argued that aims changed, or it could be argued that security against western attack after the trauma of allied intervention and the overturning of the Paris settlement remained constant.

bottom of page